共 50 条
Pallidal deep-brain stimulation in primary generalized or segmental dystonia
被引:691
|作者:
Kupsch, Andreas
Benecke, Reiner
Mueller, Joerg
Trottenberg, Thomas
Schneider, Gerd-Helge
Poewe, Werner
Eisner, Wilhelm
Wolters, Alexander
Mueller, Jan-Uwe
Deuschl, Guenther
Pinsker, Marcus O.
Skogseid, Inger Marie
Roeste, Geir Ketil
Vollmer-Haase, Juliane
Brentrup, Angela
Krause, Martin
Tronnier, Volker
Schnitzler, Alfons
Voges, Juergen
Nikkhah, Guido
Vesper, Jan
Naumann, Markus
Volkmann, Jens
机构:
[1] Univ Kiel, Dept Neurol, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
[2] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Rostock, Rostock, Germany
[4] Ernst Moritz Arndt Univ Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
[5] Univ Munster, D-4400 Munster, Germany
[6] Heidelberg Univ, Heidelberg, Germany
[7] Univ Dusseldorf, D-4000 Dusseldorf, Germany
[8] Univ Cologne, Cologne, Germany
[9] Univ Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
[10] Univ Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany
[11] Med Univ Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[12] Univ Oslo, Oslo, Norway
来源:
关键词:
D O I:
10.1056/NEJMoa063618
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
BACKGROUND: Neurostimulation of the internal globus pallidus has been shown to be effective in reducing symptoms of primary dystonia. We compared this surgical treatment with sham stimulation in a randomized, controlled clinical trial. METHODS: Forty patients with primary segmental or generalized dystonia received an implanted device for deep-brain stimulation and were randomly assigned to receive either neurostimulation or sham stimulation for 3 months. The primary end point was the change from baseline to 3 months in the severity of symptoms, according to the movement subscore on the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (range, 0 to 120, with higher scores indicating greater impairment). Two investigators who were unaware of treatment status assessed the severity of dystonia by reviewing videotaped sessions. Subsequently, all patients received open-label neurostimulation; blinded assessment was repeated after 6 months of active treatment. RESULTS: Three months after randomization, the change from baseline in the mean (+/-SD) movement score was significantly greater in the neurostimulation group (-15.8+/-14.1 points) than in the sham-stimulation group (-1.4+/-3.8 points, P<0.001). During the open-label extension period, this improvement was sustained among patients originally assigned to the neurostimulation group, and patients in the sham-stimulation group had a similar benefit when they switched to active treatment. The combined analysis of the entire cohort after 6 months of neurostimulation revealed substantial improvement in all movement symptoms (except speech and swallowing), the level of disability, and quality of life, as compared with baseline scores. A total of 22 adverse events occurred in 19 patients, including 4 infections at the stimulator site and 1 lead dislodgment. The most frequent adverse event was dysarthria. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral pallidal neurostimulation for 3 months was more effective than sham stimulation in patients with primary generalized or segmental dystonia.
引用
收藏
页码:1978 / 1990
页数:13
相关论文