Pallidal deep-brain stimulation in primary generalized or segmental dystonia

被引:691
|
作者
Kupsch, Andreas
Benecke, Reiner
Mueller, Joerg
Trottenberg, Thomas
Schneider, Gerd-Helge
Poewe, Werner
Eisner, Wilhelm
Wolters, Alexander
Mueller, Jan-Uwe
Deuschl, Guenther
Pinsker, Marcus O.
Skogseid, Inger Marie
Roeste, Geir Ketil
Vollmer-Haase, Juliane
Brentrup, Angela
Krause, Martin
Tronnier, Volker
Schnitzler, Alfons
Voges, Juergen
Nikkhah, Guido
Vesper, Jan
Naumann, Markus
Volkmann, Jens
机构
[1] Univ Kiel, Dept Neurol, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
[2] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Rostock, Rostock, Germany
[4] Ernst Moritz Arndt Univ Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
[5] Univ Munster, D-4400 Munster, Germany
[6] Heidelberg Univ, Heidelberg, Germany
[7] Univ Dusseldorf, D-4000 Dusseldorf, Germany
[8] Univ Cologne, Cologne, Germany
[9] Univ Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
[10] Univ Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany
[11] Med Univ Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[12] Univ Oslo, Oslo, Norway
来源
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE | 2006年 / 355卷 / 19期
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa063618
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Neurostimulation of the internal globus pallidus has been shown to be effective in reducing symptoms of primary dystonia. We compared this surgical treatment with sham stimulation in a randomized, controlled clinical trial. METHODS: Forty patients with primary segmental or generalized dystonia received an implanted device for deep-brain stimulation and were randomly assigned to receive either neurostimulation or sham stimulation for 3 months. The primary end point was the change from baseline to 3 months in the severity of symptoms, according to the movement subscore on the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (range, 0 to 120, with higher scores indicating greater impairment). Two investigators who were unaware of treatment status assessed the severity of dystonia by reviewing videotaped sessions. Subsequently, all patients received open-label neurostimulation; blinded assessment was repeated after 6 months of active treatment. RESULTS: Three months after randomization, the change from baseline in the mean (+/-SD) movement score was significantly greater in the neurostimulation group (-15.8+/-14.1 points) than in the sham-stimulation group (-1.4+/-3.8 points, P<0.001). During the open-label extension period, this improvement was sustained among patients originally assigned to the neurostimulation group, and patients in the sham-stimulation group had a similar benefit when they switched to active treatment. The combined analysis of the entire cohort after 6 months of neurostimulation revealed substantial improvement in all movement symptoms (except speech and swallowing), the level of disability, and quality of life, as compared with baseline scores. A total of 22 adverse events occurred in 19 patients, including 4 infections at the stimulator site and 1 lead dislodgment. The most frequent adverse event was dysarthria. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral pallidal neurostimulation for 3 months was more effective than sham stimulation in patients with primary generalized or segmental dystonia.
引用
收藏
页码:1978 / 1990
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pallidal deep brain stimulation for primary segmental dystonia
    Biguzzi, S.
    Sensi, M.
    Cavallo, M. A.
    Lettieri, C.
    Quatrale, R.
    Sette, E.
    Tugnoli, V.
    Fainardi, E.
    Tola, M. R.
    Granieri, E.
    Eleopra, R.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2007, 22 : S48 - S48
  • [2] Deep-brain stimulation for generalized dystonia
    Greene, P
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (05): : 498 - 500
  • [3] Pallidal deep brain stimulation is effective, and improves quality of life in primary segmental and generalized dystonia
    Skogseid, I. M.
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2008, 117 : 51 - 55
  • [4] Pallidal chronic deep brain stimulation for primary generalized and segmental dystonia with different age of onset
    Tomskiy, A.
    Gamaleya, A.
    Orlova, O.
    Timerbaeva, S.
    Isagulyan, E.
    Dekopov, A.
    Salova, E.
    Fedorova, N.
    Shabalov, V.
    JOURNAL OF NEURAL TRANSMISSION, 2010, 117 (10) : 1245 - 1245
  • [5] Pallidal Versus Subthalamic Deep-Brain Stimulation for Generalized Isolated Dystonia: A Retrospective Study
    Wu, Jingchao
    Zhu, Guanyu
    Gan, Yifei
    Meng, Fangang
    Yang, Anchao
    Zhang, Jianguo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (16)
  • [6] Pallidal deep brain stimulation improves segmental dystonia
    Wohrle, Johannes
    Blahak, Christian
    Kekelia, Keti
    Capelle, H. -Holger
    Baezner, Hansjorg
    Grips, Eva
    Weigel, Ralf
    Krauss, Joachim K.
    NEUROLOGY, 2007, 68 (12) : A333 - A334
  • [7] Effect of pallidal deep-brain stimulation on articulation rate in dystonia
    Rusz, Jan
    Fecikova, Anna
    Tykalova, Tereza
    Jech, Robert
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 40 (04) : 869 - 873
  • [8] Effect of pallidal deep-brain stimulation on articulation rate in dystonia
    Jan Rusz
    Anna Fečíková
    Tereza Tykalová
    Robert Jech
    Neurological Sciences, 2019, 40 : 869 - 873
  • [9] Low frequency pallidal deep brain stimulation for primary generalized dystonia
    Alterman, R. L.
    Miravite, J.
    Shils, J. L.
    Weisz, D.
    Tagliati, M.
    STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 2007, 85 (01) : 20 - 20
  • [10] Bilateral deep-brain stimulation of the globus pallidus in primary generalized dystonia
    Vidailhet, M
    Vercueil, L
    Houeto, JL
    Krystkowiak, P
    Benabid, AL
    Cornu, P
    Lagrange, C
    du Montcel, ST
    Dormont, D
    Grand, S
    Blond, S
    Detante, O
    Pillon, B
    Ardouin, C
    Agid, Y
    Destée, A
    Pollak, P
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (05): : 459 - 467