Experimental tests of self-selection and screening in insurance decisions

被引:16
|
作者
Shapira, Z
Venezia, I
机构
[1] NYU, Stern Sch Business, New York, NY 10012 USA
[2] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Sch Business, Jerusalem, Israel
来源
GENEVA PAPERS ON RISK AND INSURANCE THEORY | 1999年 / 24卷 / 02期
关键词
self-election; screening; information asymmetry; insurance markets;
D O I
10.1023/A:1008737526974
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
A major characteristic of insurance markets is information asymmetry that may lead to phenomena such as adverse selection and moral hazard. Another aspect of markets with asymmetric information is self-selection, which refers to the pattern of choices that individuals with different personal characteristics make when facing a menu of contracts or options. To combat problems of asymmetric information, insurance firms can use screening. That is, they can offer the clients a menu of choices and infer their characteristics from their choices. This article reports the results of several studies that examined the degree to which people behave according to the notions of self-selection and screening. Subjects played the role of either insurance buyers or sellers. The results of these studies provide partial support for the hypothesis that subjects use self-selection and screening in insurance markets Our study also points at the importance of learning in experimental studies In one-stage experiments where subjects did not get feedback, screening was not detected. When multistage experiments were conducted; and the subjects learned from experience and were also taught the relevant theories, their decisions were more aligned with screening.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 158
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Self-Selection of Accessibility Options
    Santhanam, Nithin
    Trewin, Shari
    Swart, Cal
    Santhanam, P.
    ASSETS 11: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL ACM SIGACCESS CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS AND ACCESSIBILITY, 2011, : 277 - 278
  • [42] On Negligence Rules and Self-Selection
    Miceli, Thomas J.
    REVIEW OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2006, 2 (03) : 349 - 361
  • [43] DIETARY SELF-SELECTION BY ANIMALS
    OVERMANN, SR
    PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1976, 83 (02) : 218 - 235
  • [44] SELF-SELECTION AND THE EFFICIENCY OF TOURNAMENTS
    Eriksson, Tor
    Teyssier, Sabrina
    Villeval, Marie-Claire
    ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2009, 47 (03) : 530 - 548
  • [45] Self-selection consistent functions
    Barberà, S
    Beviá, C
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2002, 105 (02) : 263 - 277
  • [46] Schooling, self-selection, and obesity
    Nayga, RM
    CONSUMER INTERESTS ANNUAL CONFERENCE, VOL. 46, 2000, : 13 - 16
  • [47] UNION ENDOGENEITY AND SELF-SELECTION
    ROBINSON, C
    JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 1989, 7 (01) : 106 - 112
  • [48] SELF-SELECTION OF PHENYLALANINE IN THE RAT
    YAMAMOTO, Y
    MAKITA, K
    MURAMATSU, K
    JOURNAL OF NUTRITIONAL SCIENCE AND VITAMINOLOGY, 1984, 30 (03) : 273 - 283
  • [49] Smoking, self-selection and absenteeism
    Leigh, JP
    QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 1995, 35 (04): : 365 - 386
  • [50] Residential self-selection in the built environment-travel behavior connection: Whose self-selection?
    Guan, Xiaodong
    Wang, Donggen
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 67 : 16 - 32