Propensity score-matched analysis comparing dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus external beam radiation therapy plus high-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer

被引:5
|
作者
Tamihardja, Joerg [1 ]
Lawrenz, Ingulf [1 ]
Lutyj, Paul [1 ]
Weick, Stefan [1 ]
Guckenberger, Matthias [2 ]
Polat, Buelent [1 ]
Flentje, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Radiat Oncol, Josef Schneider Str 11, D-97080 Wurzburg, Germany
[2] Univ Zurich, Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Radiat Oncol, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Long-term outcome; Dose escalation; High-dose-rate brachytherapy boost; Propensity score matching; Toxicity; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; TRIAL; BOOST; FRACTIONATION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s00066-022-01953-y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and EBRT + high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost are guideline-recommended treatment options for localized prostate cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare long-term outcome and toxicity of dose-escalated EBRT versus EBRT + HDR-BT boost. Methods From 2002 to 2019, 744 consecutive patients received either EBRT or EBRT + HDR-BT boost, of whom 516 patients were propensity score matched. Median follow-up was 95.3 months. Cone beam CT image-guided EBRT consisted of 33 fractions of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost up to 76.23 Gy (D-Mean). Combined treatment was delivered as 46 Gy (D-Mean) EBRT, followed by two fractions HDR-BT boost with 9 Gy (D-90%). Propensity score matching was applied before analysis of the primary endpoint, estimated 10-year biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS), and the secondary endpoints metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS). Prognostic parameters were analyzed by Cox proportional hazard modelling. Genitourinary (GU)/gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity evaluation used the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (v5.0). Results The estimated 10-year bRFS was 82.0% vs. 76.4% (p = 0.075) for EBRT alone versus combined treatment, respectively. The estimated 10-year MFS was 82.9% vs. 87.0% (p = 0.195) and the 10-year OS was 65.7% vs. 68.9% (p = 0.303), respectively. Cumulative 5-year late GU >= grade 2 toxicities were seen in 23.6% vs. 19.2% (p = 0.086) and 5-year late GI >= grade 2 toxicities in 11.1% vs. 5.0% of the patients (p = 0.002); cumulative 5-year late grade 3 GU toxicity occurred in 4.2% vs. 3.6% (p = 0.401) and GI toxicity in 1.0% vs. 0.3% (p = 0.249), respectively. Conclusion Both treatment groups showed excellent long-term outcomes with low rates of severe toxicity.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 743
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparing the Effectiveness of Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy, High Dose Rate Brachytherapy and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Low/Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
    Lanni, T. B.
    Ghilezan, M. I.
    Gustafson, G. S.
    Marvin, K. S.
    Ye, H.
    Vicini, F. A.
    Martinez, A. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S397 - S397
  • [32] SINGLE FRACTION HIGH DOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY AND HYPOFRACTIONATED EXTERNAL BEAM RADIATION THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER
    Cury, F.
    Souhami, L.
    Aprikian, A.
    Horacio, P.
    Shenouda, G.
    Faria, S.
    David, M.
    Kassouf, W.
    Duclos, M.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 92 : S11 - S11
  • [33] Image-guided dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: treating to doses beyond 78 Gy
    Eade, Thomas N.
    Guo, Linxin
    Forde, Elizabeth
    Vaux, Ken
    Vass, Justin
    Hunt, Peter
    Kneebone, Andrew
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 (11) : 1655 - 1660
  • [34] Radiobiological evaluation of simultaneously dose-escalated versus non-escalated intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients with upper thoracic esophageal cancer
    Huang, Bao-Tian
    Wu, Li-Li
    Guo, Long-Jia
    Xu, Liang-Yu
    Huang, Rui-Hong
    Lin, Pei-Xian
    Chen, Jian-Zhou
    Li, De-Rui
    Chen, Chuang-Zhen
    [J]. ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2017, 10 : 2209 - 2217
  • [35] Efficacy and toxicity of image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy combined with dose-escalated brachytherapy for stage IIB cervical cancer
    Wang, Weiping
    Meng, Qingyu
    Hou, Xiaorong
    Lian, Xin
    Yan, Junfang
    Sun, Shuai
    Liu, Zhikai
    Miao, Zheng
    Wang, Dunhuang
    Liu, Xiaoliang
    Hu, Ke
    Zhang, Fuquan
    [J]. ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (61) : 102965 - 102973
  • [36] Radiation Dose Escalation for Localized Prostate Cancer Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Versus Permanent Transperineal Brachytherapy
    Wong, William W.
    Vora, Sujay A.
    Schild, Steven E.
    Ezzell, Gary A.
    Andrews, Paul E.
    Ferrigni, Robert G.
    Swanson, Scott K.
    [J]. CANCER, 2009, 115 (23) : 5596 - 5606
  • [37] The Current Role of Androgen Deprivation in Patients Undergoing Dose-Escalated External Beam Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
    Smith, Michael J.
    Akhtar, Naveed H.
    Tagawa, Scott T.
    [J]. PROSTATE CANCER, 2012, 2012
  • [38] Does intensity-modulated radiation therapy by helical tomotherapy for prostate cancer increase the subsequent risk of bladder cancer? A propensity score-matched analysis
    Tsukuda, Fumio
    Tanaka, Yasunari
    Narita, Shuichiro
    Shimizu, Toshihiro
    Nakasuka, Shu
    Hagiwara, Kiichi
    Sakamoto, Noboru
    Toshihiro, Kawano
    Horiguchi, Yutaka
    Koga, Shoji
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 31 (04) : 379 - 385
  • [39] A dosimetric analysis of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) as an alternative to adjuvant high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in early endometrial cancer patients
    Aydogan, Bulent
    Mundt, Arno J.
    Smith, Brett D.
    Mell, Loren K.
    Wang, Steve
    Sutton, Harold
    Roeske, John C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 65 (01): : 266 - 273
  • [40] Hypofractionated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Long-term Outcomes and a Comparison to Standard Dose-Escalated RT
    Weller, M. A.
    Kupelian, P. A.
    Reddy, C. A.
    Kotecha, R.
    Ciezki, J. P.
    Klein, E. A.
    Stephans, K. L.
    Tendulkar, R. D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : S152 - S153