Propensity score-matched analysis comparing dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus external beam radiation therapy plus high-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer

被引:5
|
作者
Tamihardja, Joerg [1 ]
Lawrenz, Ingulf [1 ]
Lutyj, Paul [1 ]
Weick, Stefan [1 ]
Guckenberger, Matthias [2 ]
Polat, Buelent [1 ]
Flentje, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Radiat Oncol, Josef Schneider Str 11, D-97080 Wurzburg, Germany
[2] Univ Zurich, Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Radiat Oncol, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Long-term outcome; Dose escalation; High-dose-rate brachytherapy boost; Propensity score matching; Toxicity; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; TRIAL; BOOST; FRACTIONATION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s00066-022-01953-y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and EBRT + high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost are guideline-recommended treatment options for localized prostate cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare long-term outcome and toxicity of dose-escalated EBRT versus EBRT + HDR-BT boost. Methods From 2002 to 2019, 744 consecutive patients received either EBRT or EBRT + HDR-BT boost, of whom 516 patients were propensity score matched. Median follow-up was 95.3 months. Cone beam CT image-guided EBRT consisted of 33 fractions of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost up to 76.23 Gy (D-Mean). Combined treatment was delivered as 46 Gy (D-Mean) EBRT, followed by two fractions HDR-BT boost with 9 Gy (D-90%). Propensity score matching was applied before analysis of the primary endpoint, estimated 10-year biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS), and the secondary endpoints metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS). Prognostic parameters were analyzed by Cox proportional hazard modelling. Genitourinary (GU)/gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity evaluation used the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (v5.0). Results The estimated 10-year bRFS was 82.0% vs. 76.4% (p = 0.075) for EBRT alone versus combined treatment, respectively. The estimated 10-year MFS was 82.9% vs. 87.0% (p = 0.195) and the 10-year OS was 65.7% vs. 68.9% (p = 0.303), respectively. Cumulative 5-year late GU >= grade 2 toxicities were seen in 23.6% vs. 19.2% (p = 0.086) and 5-year late GI >= grade 2 toxicities in 11.1% vs. 5.0% of the patients (p = 0.002); cumulative 5-year late grade 3 GU toxicity occurred in 4.2% vs. 3.6% (p = 0.401) and GI toxicity in 1.0% vs. 0.3% (p = 0.249), respectively. Conclusion Both treatment groups showed excellent long-term outcomes with low rates of severe toxicity.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 743
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Propensity score-matched analysis comparing dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus external beam radiation therapy plus high-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer
    Jörg Tamihardja
    Ingulf Lawrenz
    Paul Lutyj
    Stefan Weick
    Matthias Guckenberger
    Bülent Polat
    Michael Flentje
    [J]. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2022, 198 : 735 - 743
  • [2] Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost in Combination With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Single-Institution Propensity Score Matched Analysis
    Chen, William C.
    Li, Yun
    Lazar, Ann
    Altun, Aysu
    Descovich, Martina
    Nano, Tomi
    Ziemer, Benjamin
    Sudhyadhom, Atchar
    Cunha, Adam
    Thomas, Horatio
    Gottschalk, Alexander
    Hsu, I-Chow
    Roach III, Mack
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 110 (02): : 429 - 437
  • [3] Randomized Trial of Hypofractionated Dose-Escalated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Conventionally Fractionated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Hoffman, K. E.
    Voong, K. R.
    Levy, L. B.
    Pugh, T. J.
    Choi, S.
    Du, W.
    Frank, S. J.
    Johnson, J. L.
    Kudchadker, R.
    Nguyen, Q. N.
    Lee, A.
    Mahmood, U.
    McGuire, S. E.
    Kuban, D. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : S32 - S32
  • [4] DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON OF HIGH-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY AND INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY AS A BOOST TO THE PROSTATE
    Hermesse, Johanne
    Biver, Sylvie
    Jansen, Nicolas
    Lenaerts, Eric
    Nickers, Philippi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (01): : 269 - 276
  • [5] Stereotactic Radiation Therapy Versus External Beam plus High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost in the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer: A Quality of Life Analysis
    Helou, J.
    Morton, G.
    Zhang, L.
    Deabreu, A.
    D'Alimonte, L.
    Alexandre, M.
    Ravi, A.
    Chung, H.
    Cheung, P.
    Loblaw, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S415 - S416
  • [6] Rates of rectal toxicity in patients treated with high dose rate brachytherapy as monotherapy compared to dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer
    Parzen, Jacob S.
    Ye, Hong
    Gustafson, Gary
    Yan, Di
    Martinez, Alvaro
    Chen, Peter Y.
    Ghilezan, Michel
    Sebastian, Evelyn
    Limbacher, Amy
    Krauss, Daniel J.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 147 : 123 - 129
  • [7] A Matched Comparison of High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Dose-Escalated, Image Guided Adaptive External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) Versus Pelvic EBRT Plus High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost
    Blas, K. G.
    Brown, M. E.
    Wallace, M.
    Tonlaar, N. Y.
    Stone, B. M.
    Chen, P. Y.
    Gustafson, G. S.
    Brabbins, D. S.
    Yan, D.
    Ye, H.
    Krauss, D. J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : S121 - S122
  • [8] Randomized Trial of Hypofractionated, Dose-Escalated, Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Versus Conventionally Fractionated IMRT for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Hoffman, Karen E.
    Voong, K. Ranh
    Levy, Lawrence B.
    Allen, Pamela K.
    Choi, Seungtaek
    Schlembach, Pamela J.
    Lee, Andrew K.
    McGuire, Sean E.
    Quynh Nguyen
    Pugh, Thomas J.
    Frank, Steven J.
    Kudchadker, Rajat J.
    Du, Weiliang
    Kuban, Deborah A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (29) : 2943 - +
  • [9] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer: does ADT still have an impact in the dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy era?
    Soyano, Takashi
    Kozuka, Takuyo
    Kashihara, Kenichi
    Murakami, Yu
    Yonese, Junji
    Sasamura, Kazuma
    Shimoyachi, Nana
    Kashihara, Tairo
    Yoshioka, Yasuo
    Oguchi, Masahiko
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 53 (06) : 514 - 521
  • [10] Propensity score matched comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer.
    Oliai, Caspian
    Bernetich, Matthew
    Brady, Luther W.
    Yang, Jun
    Arrigo, Steven
    Lamond, John
    Good, Michael
    Mooreville, Michael
    Garber, Bruce
    Lanciano, Rachelle Marie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)