The EORTC CAT Core-The computer adaptive version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire

被引:61
|
作者
Petersen, Morten Aa [1 ]
Aaronson, Neil K. [2 ]
Arraras, Juan, I [3 ]
Chie, Wei-Chu [4 ]
Conroy, Thierry [5 ]
Costantini, Anna [6 ]
Dirven, Linda [7 ,8 ]
Fayers, Peter [9 ]
Gamper, Eva-Maria [10 ]
Giesinger, Johannes M. [10 ]
Habets, Esther J. J. [7 ]
Hammerlid, Eva [11 ]
Helbostad, Jorunn [12 ]
Hjermstad, Marianne J. [13 ,14 ]
Holzner, Bernhard [10 ]
Johnson, Colin [15 ]
Kemmler, Georg [10 ]
King, Madeleine T. [16 ,17 ]
Kaasa, Stein [18 ,19 ]
Loge, Jon H. [20 ]
Reijneveld, Jaap C. [21 ,22 ]
Singer, Susanne [23 ]
Taphoorn, Martin J. B. [7 ,8 ]
Thamsborg, Lise H. [1 ]
Tomaszewski, Krzysztof A. [24 ]
Velikova, Galina [25 ]
Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M. [26 ]
Young, Teresa [27 ]
Groenvold, Mogens [1 ,28 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Hosp, Dept Palliat Med, Res Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Netherlands Canc Inst, Div Psychosocial Res & Epidemiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Hosp Navarre, Med Oncol Dept, Pamplona, Spain
[4] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Inst Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Dept Publ Hlth, Taipei, Taiwan
[5] Inst Cancerol Lorraine, Med Oncol Dept, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
[6] Psychol Sapienza Univ, St Andrea Hosp, Fac Med, Psychoncol Unit, Rome, Italy
[7] Haaglanden Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, POB 432, NL-2501 CK The Hague, Netherlands
[8] Leiden Univ, Dept Neurol, Med Ctr, POB 9600, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[9] Univ Aberdeen, Div Appl Hlth Sci, Aberdeen, Scotland
[10] Innsbruck Med Univ, Dept Psychiat Psychotherapy & Psychosomat Med, Innsbruck, Austria
[11] Gothenburg Univ, Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Gothenburg, Sweden
[12] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, St Olav Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosci, Trondheim, Norway
[13] Univ Oslo, European Palliat Care Res Ctr PRC, Dept Oncol, Oslo Univ Hosp, Oslo, Norway
[14] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[15] Univ Southampton, Fac Med, Surg Unit, Southampton, Hants, England
[16] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[17] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[18] Univ Oslo, Oslo Univ Hosp, Oslo, Norway
[19] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, European Palliat Care Res Ctr PRC, Oslo, Norway
[20] Univ Hosp Trondheim, Palliat Med Unit, Trondheim, Norway
[21] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Brain Tumor Ctr Amsterdam, Dept Neurol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[22] Acad Med Ctr, Brain Tumor Ctr Amsterdam, Dept Neurol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[23] Univ Med Ctr, Inst Med Biostat, Div Epidemiol & Hlth Serv Res, Epidemiol & Informat, Mainz, Germany
[24] Ignatianum Acad, Fac Educ, Dept Gerontol Geriatr & Social Work, Hlth Outcomes Res Unit, Krakow, Poland
[25] Univ Leeds, Fac Med & Hlth, Leeds Inst Canc & Pathol, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[26] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[27] East & North Hertfordshire NHS Trust Incorporatin, Mt Vernon Canc Ctr, Northwood, Middx, England
[28] Univ Copenhagen, Inst Publ Hlth, Copenhagen, Denmark
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
Computerized adaptive test; EORTC QLQ-C30; Health related quality of life; Item response theory; Item development; Item banking; Patient-reported outcome; ITEM BANK; TESTING CAT; PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION; CLINICAL-TRIALS; FATIGUE; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2018.04.016
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: To optimise measurement precision, relevance to patients and flexibility, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) should ideally be adapted to the individual patient/study while retaining direct comparability of scores across patients/studies. This is achievable using item banks and computerised adaptive tests (CATs). The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) is one of the most widely used PROMs in cancer research and clinical practice. Here we provide an overview of the research program to develop CAT versions of the QLQ-C30's 14 functional and symptom domains. Methods: The EORTC Quality of Life Group's strategy for developing CAT item banks consists of: literature search to identify potential candidate items; formulation of new items compatible with the QLQ-C30 item style; expert evaluations and patient interviews; field-testing and psychometric analyses, including factor analysis, item response theory calibration and simulation of measurement properties. In addition, software for setting up, running and scoring CAT has been developed. Results: Across eight rounds of data collections, 9782 patients were recruited from 12 countries for the field-testing. The four phases of development resulted in a total of 260 unique items across the 14 domains. Each item bank consists of 7-34 items. Psychometric evaluations indicated higher measurement precision and increased statistical power of the CAT measures compared to the QLQ-C30 scales. Using CAT, sample size requirements may be reduced by approximately 20-35% on average without loss of power. Conclusions: The EORTC CAT Core represents a more precise, powerful and flexible measurement system than the QLQ-C30. It is currently being validated in a large independent, international sample of cancer patients. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 16
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-c30 version 3.0 Turkish) in cancer patients under palliative radiotherapy
    Hicsonmez, A.
    Kose, K.
    Andrieu, M. Nalca
    Guney, Y.
    Kurtman, C.
    [J]. EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2005, 3 (02): : 383 - 383
  • [22] Psychometric properties of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Uganda
    Naamala, Allen
    Eriksson, Lars E.
    Orem, Jackson
    Nalwadda, Gorrette K.
    Kabir, Zarina Nahar
    Wettergren, Lena
    [J]. HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [23] The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30
    King, MT
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1996, 5 (06) : 555 - 567
  • [24] Assessing measurement invariance in the EORTC QLQ-C30
    Janneke van Roij
    Jacobien M. Kieffer
    Lonneke van de Poll-Franse
    Olga Husson
    Natasja J. H. Raijmakers
    John Gelissen
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2022, 31 : 889 - 901
  • [25] Assessing measurement invariance in the EORTC QLQ-C30
    van Roij, Janneke
    Kieffer, Jacobien M.
    van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke
    Husson, Olga
    Raijmakers, Natasja J. H.
    Gelissen, John
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (03) : 889 - 901
  • [26] Psychometric properties of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Uganda
    Allen Naamala
    Lars E. Eriksson
    Jackson Orem
    Gorrette K. Nalwadda
    Zarina Nahar Kabir
    Lena Wettergren
    [J]. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 19
  • [27] The European organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life core questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Validation of English version in Singapore
    Xie, F
    Luo, N
    Li, SC
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2004, 7 (03) : 252 - 252
  • [28] Reliability and Validity of the Arabic Version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 Questionnaires
    Jassim, Ghufran
    AlAnsari, Ahmed
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2020, 16 : 3045 - 3052
  • [29] DEVELOPMENT OF A HEAD AND NECK CANCER-SPECIFIC MODULE FOR USE WITH THE EORTC CORE QUALITY-OF-LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE (EORTC QLQ-C30)
    BJORDAL, K
    KAASA, S
    AHLNERELMQVIST, M
    TOLLESSON, E
    BONDE, A
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1993, 2 (01) : 72 - 72
  • [30] Translation and Validation of EORTC QLQ-C30 into Indonesian Version for Cancer Patients in Indonesia
    Perwitasari, Dyah Aryani
    Atthobari, Jarir
    Dwiprahasto, Iwan
    Hakimi, Mohammad
    Gelderblom, Hans
    Putter, Hein
    Nortier, Johan W. R.
    Guchelaar, Henk-Jan
    Kaptein, Ad A.
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 41 (04) : 519 - 529