Digital Twins and Cyber-Physical Systems toward Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0: Correlation and Comparison

被引:541
|
作者
Tao, Fei [1 ]
Qi, Qinglin [1 ]
Wang, Lihui [2 ]
Nee, A. Y. C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Automat Sci & Elect Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Prod Engn, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Mech Engn, Singapore 117575, Singapore
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cyber-physical systems (CPS); Digital twin (DT); Smart manufacturing; Correlation and comparison; FUTURE; SERVICE; DESIGN; CPS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eng.2019.01.014
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
State-of-the-art technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), cloud computing (CC), big data analytics (BDA), and artificial intelligence (AI) have greatly stimulated the development of smart manufacturing. An important prerequisite for smart manufacturing is cyber-physical integration, which is increasingly being embraced by manufacturers. As the preferred means of such integration, cyber-physical systems (CPS) and digital twins (DTs) have gained extensive attention from researchers and practitioners in industry. With feedback loops in which physical processes affect cyber parts and vice versa, CPS and DTs can endow manufacturing systems with greater efficiency, resilience, and intelligence. CPS and DTs share the same essential concepts of an intensive cyber-physical connection, real-time interaction, organization integration, and in-depth collaboration. However, CPS and DTs are not identical from many perspectives, including their origin, development, engineering practices, cyber-physical mapping, and core elements. In order to highlight the differences and correlation between them, this paper reviews and analyzes CPS and DTs from multiple perspectives. (C) 2019 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier LTD on behalf of Chinese Academy of Engineering and Higher Education Press Limited Company.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 661
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Smart Manufacturing Systems based on Cyber-physical Manufacturing Services (CPMS)
    Lu, Yan
    Ju, Feng
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2017, 50 (01): : 15883 - 15889
  • [42] Cyber-Physical Systems and Digital Twins in the Industrial Internet of Things
    Koulamas, Christos
    Kalogeras, Athanasios
    [J]. COMPUTER, 2018, 51 (11) : 95 - 98
  • [43] Development of Digital Twins to Support the Functioning of Cyber-physical Systems
    Pankratova, Nataliya
    Golinko, Igor
    [J]. COMPUTER SCIENCE JOURNAL OF MOLDOVA, 2023, 31 (03) : 299 - 320
  • [44] Enhancing Cyber Situational Awareness for Cyber-Physical Systems through Digital Twins
    Eckhart, Matthias
    Ekelhart, Andreas
    Weippl, Edgar
    [J]. 2019 24TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES AND FACTORY AUTOMATION (ETFA), 2019, : 1222 - 1225
  • [45] Cyber Physical Systems for Industry 4.0: Towards Real Time Virtual Reality in Smart Manufacturing
    Frontoni, Emanuele
    Loncarski, Jelena
    Pierdicca, Roberto
    Bernardini, Michele
    Sasso, Michele
    [J]. AUGMENTED REALITY, VIRTUAL REALITY, AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS, AVR 2018, PT II, 2018, 10851 : 422 - 434
  • [46] Intelligent Link between Lean Manufacturing and the Cyber-Physical Industry 4.0 System
    Ionel, R. Danut-Sorin
    Lamanna, Giuseppe
    Opran, Constantin Gheorghe
    [J]. MACROMOLECULAR SYMPOSIA, 2022, 404 (01)
  • [47] Industry 4.0 as a Cyber-Physical System study
    Mosterman, Pieter J.
    Zander, Justyna
    [J]. SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS MODELING, 2016, 15 (01): : 17 - 29
  • [48] Industry 4.0 as a Cyber-Physical System study
    Pieter J. Mosterman
    Justyna Zander
    [J]. Software & Systems Modeling, 2016, 15 : 17 - 29
  • [49] Cyber-Physical Manufacturing Systems
    Tilbury, Dawn M.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF CONTROL, ROBOTICS, AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, VOL 2, 2019, 2 : 427 - 443
  • [50] Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing
    Monostori, L.
    Kadar, B.
    Bauernhansl, T.
    Kondoh, S.
    Kumara, S.
    Reinhart, G.
    Sauer, O.
    Schuh, G.
    Sihn, W.
    Ueda, K.
    [J]. CIRP ANNALS-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 65 (02) : 621 - 641