The Predictive Performance and Stability of Six Species Distribution Models

被引:158
|
作者
Duan, Ren-Yan [1 ]
Kong, Xiao-Quan [1 ]
Huang, Min-Yi [1 ]
Fan, Wei-Yi [2 ]
Wang, Zhi-Gao [1 ]
机构
[1] Anqing Normal Coll, Sch Life Sci, Anqing, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Shaanxi Normal Univ, Coll Life Sci, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 11期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; UNCERTAINTY; NICHE; CLASSIFICATION; FORESTS; OAK; CONSERVATION; DISTURBANCE; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0112764
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Predicting species' potential geographical range by species distribution models (SDMs) is central to understand their ecological requirements. However, the effects of using different modeling techniques need further investigation. In order to improve the prediction effect, we need to assess the predictive performance and stability of different SDMs. Methodology: We collected the distribution data of five common tree species (Pinus massoniana, Betula platyphylla, Quercus wutaishanica, Quercus mongolica and Quercus variabilis) and simulated their potential distribution area using 13 environmental variables and six widely used SDMs: BIOCLIM, DOMAIN, MAHAL, RF, MAXENT, and SVM. Each model run was repeated 100 times (trials). We compared the predictive performance by testing the consistency between observations and simulated distributions and assessed the stability by the standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and the 99% confidence interval of Kappa and AUC values. Results: The mean values of AUC and Kappa from MAHAL, RF, MAXENT, and SVM trials were similar and significantly higher than those from BIOCLIM and DOMAIN trials (p<0.05), while the associated standard deviations and coefficients of variation were larger for BIOCLIM and DOMAIN trials (p<0.05), and the 99% confidence intervals for AUC and Kappa values were narrower for MAHAL, RF, MAXENT, and SVM. Compared to BIOCLIM and DOMAIN, other SDMs (MAHAL, RF, MAXENT, and SVM) had higher prediction accuracy, smaller confidence intervals, and were more stable and less affected by the random variable (randomly selected pseudo-absence points). Conclusions: According to the prediction performance and stability of SDMs, we can divide these six SDMs into two categories: a high performance and stability group including MAHAL, RF, MAXENT, and SVM, and a low performance and stability group consisting of BIOCLIM, and DOMAIN. We highlight that choosing appropriate SDMs to address a specific problem is an important part of the modeling process.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Integrating uncertain prior knowledge regarding ecological preferences into multi-species distribution models: Effects of model complexity on predictive performance
    Vermeiren, Peter
    Reichert, Peter
    Schuwirth, Nele
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2020, 420
  • [42] Growth models for six Eucalyptus species in Angola
    Delgado-Matas, Cristobal
    Pukkala, Timo
    SOUTHERN FORESTS-A JOURNAL OF FOREST SCIENCE, 2015, 77 (02) : 141 - 152
  • [43] Distribution of leaf orientations in six conifer species
    Barclay, HJ
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE, 2001, 79 (04): : 389 - 397
  • [44] Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology
    Guisan, A
    Zimmermann, NE
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2000, 135 (2-3) : 147 - 186
  • [45] Performance of alternative methods for generating species distribution models for invasive species in the Laurentian Great Lakes
    Prescott, Victoria A.
    Marte, Jack
    Keller, Reuben P.
    FISHERIES, 2025,
  • [46] A simple post-hoc method to add spatial context to predictive species distribution models
    Ashcroft, Michael B.
    French, Kristine O.
    Chisholm, Laurie A.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2012, 228 : 17 - 26
  • [47] Sampling bias in geographic and environmental space and its effect on the predictive power of species distribution models
    Bystriakova, Nadia
    Peregrym, Mykyta
    Erkens, Roy H. J.
    Bezsmertna, Olesya
    Schneider, Harald
    SYSTEMATICS AND BIODIVERSITY, 2012, 10 (03) : 305 - 315
  • [48] Extended Predictive Control: Stability and Performance
    Viudez-Moreiras, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2015, 137 (11):
  • [49] Bounding species distribution models
    Stohlgren, Thomas J.
    Jarnevich, Catherine S.
    Esaias, Wayne E.
    Morisette, Jeffrey T.
    CURRENT ZOOLOGY, 2011, 57 (05) : 642 - 647
  • [50] Hierarchical Species Distribution Models
    Trevor J. Hefley
    Mevin B. Hooten
    Current Landscape Ecology Reports, 2016, 1 (2) : 87 - 97