Clinical trial participants' experiences of completing questionnaires: a qualitative study

被引:7
|
作者
Holmberg, Christine [1 ,2 ]
Karner, Julia J. [1 ]
Rappenecker, Julia [1 ]
Witt, Claudia M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Inst Social Med Epidemiol & Hlth Econ, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[2] Charite, Berlin Sch Publ Hlth, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Zurich Hosp, Inst Complementary & Integrat Med, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2014年 / 4卷 / 03期
关键词
PAIN MANAGEMENT; GERIATRIC MEDICINE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; NECK DISABILITY INDEX; PAIN INTENSITY; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; RATING-SCALES; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; YOUNGER; VERSION; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004363
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To improve clinical study developments for elderly populations, we aim to understand how they transfer their experiences into validated, standardised self-completed study measurement instruments. We analysed how women (mean 78 +/- 8 years of age) participating in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) cognised study instruments used to evaluate outcomes of the intervention. Setting The interview study was nested in an RCT on chronic neck pain using common measurement instruments situated in an elderly community in Berlin, Germany, which comprised of units for independent and assisted-living options. Participants The sample (n=20 women) was selected from the RCT sample (n=117, 95% women, mean age 76 (SD +/- 8) years). Interview participants were selected using a purposive sampling list based on the RCT outcomes. Outcomes We asked participants about their experiences completing the RCT questionnaires. Interviews were analysed thematically, then compared with the questionnaires. Results Interviewees had difficulties in translating complex experiences into a single value on a scale and understanding the relationship of the questionnaires to study aims. Interviewees considered important for the trial that their actual experiences were understood by trial organisers. This information was not transferrable by means of the questionnaires. To rectify these difficulties, interviewees used strategies such as adding notes, adding response categories or skipping an item. Conclusions Elderly interview participants understood the importance of completing questionnaires for trial success. This led to strategies of completing the questionnaires that resulted in 'missing' or ambiguous data. To improve data collection in elderly populations, educational materials addressing the differential logics should be developed and tested. Pilot testing validated instruments using cognitive interviews may be particularly important in such populations. Finally, when the target of an intervention is a subjective experience, it seems important to create a method by which participants can convey their personal experiences. These could be nested qualitative studies. Trial registration number ISRCTN77108101807.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Experiences of Older Adults with Frailty Not Completing an Advance Directive: A Qualitative Study of ACP Conversations
    Wan, Zoe
    Chan, Helen Y. L.
    Chiu, Patrick K. C.
    Lo, Raymond S. K.
    Cheng, Hui-Lin
    Leung, Doris Y. P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (09)
  • [32] Participants’ expectations and experiences with periodic health examinations in Austria - a qualitative study
    Isolde Sommer
    Viktoria Titscher
    Gerald Gartlehner
    BMC Health Services Research, 18
  • [33] Expectations and experiences of participants in ongoing adoption reunion relationships: A qualitative study
    Affleck, MK
    Steed, LG
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPSYCHIATRY, 2001, 71 (01) : 38 - 48
  • [34] Participants' expectations and experiences with periodic health examinations in Austria - a qualitative study
    Sommer, Isolde
    Titscher, Viktoria
    Gartlehner, Gerald
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
  • [35] Unblinding following trial participation: Qualitative study of participants' perspectives
    Armstrong, Natalie
    Jackson, Clare J.
    McNicol, Sarah
    Dixon-Woods, Mary
    Kenyon, Sara
    Tarrant, Carolyn
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2013, 10 (01) : 97 - 103
  • [36] Receiving a summary of the results of a trial: qualitative study of participants' views
    Dixon-Woods, M
    Jackson, C
    Windridge, KC
    Kenyon, S
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7535): : 206 - 209
  • [37] CLINICAL TRIAL SITE ATTITUDES AND EXPERIENCES IN MANAGING BYOD EPRO: RESULTS OF A QUALITATIVE STUDY
    Garner, K.
    Byrom, B.
    Sutherland, R.
    Symonds, N.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (01) : S277 - S277
  • [38] Staff experiences of closing out a clinical trial involving withdrawal of treatment: qualitative study
    White, David
    Lawton, Julia
    Rankin, David
    Elliott, Jackie
    Taylor, Carolin
    Cooper, Cindy
    Heller, Simon
    Hallowell, Nina
    TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [39] Staff experiences of closing out a clinical trial involving withdrawal of treatment: qualitative study
    Lawton, Julia
    White, David
    Rankin, David
    Elliott, Jackie
    Taylor, Carolin
    Cooper, Cindy
    Heller, Simon
    Hallowell, Nina
    TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [40] Staff experiences of closing out a clinical trial involving withdrawal of treatment: qualitative study
    Julia Lawton
    David White
    David Rankin
    Jackie Elliott
    Carolin Taylor
    Cindy Cooper
    Simon Heller
    Nina Hallowell
    Trials, 18