Attention effects on the processing of task-relevant and task-irrelevant speech sounds and letters

被引:8
|
作者
Mittag, Maria [1 ]
Inauri, Karina [2 ]
Huovilainen, Tatu [2 ]
Leminen, Miika [1 ,3 ]
Salo, Emma [2 ]
Rinne, Teemu [2 ]
Kujala, Teija [1 ,4 ]
Alho, Kimmo [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Inst Behav Sci, Cognit Brain Res Unit, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Inst Behav Sci, Div Cognit Psychol & Neuropsychol, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Jyvaskyla, Finnish Ctr Excellence Interdisciplinary Mus Re, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Cicero Learning Network, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[5] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki Collegium Adv Studies, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
来源
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
attention; suppression; event-related potential; EEG; audition; speech; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; BILATERAL STIMULUS ARRAYS; INDEX FOCUSED ATTENTION; HUMAN AUDITORY-CORTEX; SELECTIVE-ATTENTION; BRAIN POTENTIALS; WORKING-MEMORY; VISUAL-STIMULI; MODULATION; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.3389/fnins.2013.00231
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
We used event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to study effects of selective attention on the processing of attended and unattended spoken syllables and letters. Participants were presented with syllables randomly occurring in the left or right ear and spoken by different voices and with a concurrent foveal stream of consonant letters written in darker or lighter fonts. During auditory phonological (A(P)) and non-phonological tasks, they responded to syllables in a designated ear starting with a vowel and spoken by female voices, respectively. These syllables occurred infrequently among standard syllables starting with a consonant and spoken by male voices. During visual phonological and non-phonological tasks, they responded to consonant letters with names starting with a vowel and to letters written in dark fonts, respectively. These letters occurred infrequently among standard letters with names starting with a consonant and written in light fonts. To examine genuine effects of attention and task on ERPs not overlapped by ERPs associated with target processing or deviance detection, these effects were studied only in ERPs to auditory and visual standards. During selective listening to syllables in a designated ear, ERPs to the attended syllables were negatively displaced during both phonological and non-phonological auditory tasks. Selective attention to letters elicited an early negative displacement and a subsequent positive displacement (Pd) of ERPs to attended letters being larger during the visual phonological than non-phonological task suggesting a higher demand for attention during the visual phonological task. Active suppression of unattended speech during the A(P) and non-phonological tasks and during the visual phonological tasks was suggested by a rejection positivity (RP) to unattended syllables. We also found evidence for suppression of the processing of task-irrelevant visual stimuli in visual ERPs during auditory tasks involving left-ear syllables.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Not all choices are created equal: The differential impact of task-relevant and task-irrelevant choices on motor learning
    Carter, Michael J.
    Elnakouri, Abdo
    Yantha, Zachary
    Ste-Marie, Diane M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 38 : S51 - S51
  • [32] Reduced automatic approach tendencies towards task-relevant and task-irrelevant food pictures in Anorexia Nervosa
    Neimeijer, Renate A. M.
    Roefs, Anne
    Glashouwer, Klaske A.
    Jonker, Nienke C.
    de Jong, Peter J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 65
  • [33] Is Task-Irrelevant Learning Really Task-Irrelevant?
    Seitz, Aaron R.
    Watanabe, Takeo
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2008, 3 (11):
  • [34] Task Attention Facilitates Learning of Task-Irrelevant Stimuli
    Huang, Tsung-Ren
    Watanabe, Takeo
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (04):
  • [35] Phonological Task Enhances the Frequency-Following Response to Deviant Task-Irrelevant Speech Sounds
    Alho, Kimmo
    Zarnowiec, Katarzyna
    Gorina-Careta, Natalia
    Escera, Cartes
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 13
  • [36] Processing of task-irrelevant sounds during typical everyday activities in children
    Debnath, Ranjan
    Wetzel, Nicole
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOBIOLOGY, 2022, 64 (07)
  • [37] Sex difference in the processing of task-relevant and task-irrelevant social information: An event-related potential study of familiar face recognition
    Wang, Jinzhao
    Kitayama, Shinobu
    Han, Shihui
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 2011, 1408 : 41 - 51
  • [38] Not all choices are created equal: Task-relevant choices enhance motor learning compared to task-irrelevant choices
    Michael J. Carter
    Diane M. Ste-Marie
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2017, 24 : 1879 - 1888
  • [39] The effect of task-irrelevant sounds on cognitive performance
    Jones, DM
    Banbury, SP
    Tremblay, S
    Macken, WJ
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS SOCIETY 43RD ANNUAL MEETING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1999, : 261 - 265
  • [40] A data-driven approach to decompose motion data into task-relevant and task-irrelevant components in categorical outcome
    Furuki, Daisuke
    Takiyama, Ken
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)