Economic evaluation of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab in the first-line treatment of advanced melanoma in Japan

被引:11
|
作者
Paly, Victoria Federico [1 ]
Hikichi, Yusuke [2 ]
Baker, Timothy [1 ]
Itakura, Eijun [2 ]
Chandran, Nisha [3 ]
Harrison, James [2 ]
机构
[1] ICON Plc, Global HTA Hlth Econ Reimbursement & Outcomes, New York, NY USA
[2] Bristol Myers Squibb KK, Tokyo, Japan
[3] ICON Plc, Global HTA Hlth Econ Reimbursement & Outcomes, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
关键词
Melanoma; immuno-oncology; cost-effectiveness; Japan; nivolumab; ipilimumab; PD-1; PHASE-II; SURVIVAL; TRIALS; EFFICACY; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1080/13696998.2020.1830781
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Aims The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab (nivo + ipi) compared to current therapeutic alternatives in first-line treatment of patients with advanced melanoma from the Japanese national healthcare payer perspective using 48-month survival data from the CheckMate 067 Phase III trial. Materials and methods A three-state partitioned survival model was developed from projections of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) to estimate accrued quality-adjusted survival and costs over a 30-year time horizon. The analysis included nivo + ipi, nivolumab, and ipilimumab monotherapies (the three treatments included in CheckMate 067). Drug acquisition, administration, disease management, subsequent therapy, and adverse event (AE) costs were obtained via published sources and expert input (solicited via Delphi panel). AE frequencies were collected from the Checkmate 067 trial. Utility weights were estimated from the Checkmate 067 trial, based on Japanese tariffs. Results were presented as incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs, cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY)). Results Nivo + ipi had the greatest estimated survival among the three competing treatments, followed by nivolumab monotherapy accruing the second greatest survival. The incremental cost-effectiveness of nivo + ipi was yen 778,000 per QALY vs. nivolumab and yen 1,584,000 per QALY vs. ipilimumab. The results indicate that nivo + ipi is cost-effective in Japan when compared to a threshold of yen 7,500,000 per QALY. This finding was found to be generally robust to sensitivity and scenario analyses. Limitations Limitations include uncertainty in long-term survival extrapolations and lack of Japan-specific clinical data. Conclusions This analysis indicates that adding ipilimumab to nivolumab therapy represents a cost-effective new treatment option for patients with unresectable malignant melanoma in Japan.
引用
收藏
页码:1542 / 1552
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy for the first-line treatment NSCLC: evidence to date
    Remon, Jordi
    Esteller, Laura
    Taus, Alvaro
    [J]. CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2019, 11 : 4893 - 4904
  • [32] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF NIVOLUMAB plus IPILIMUMAB IN FIRST-LINE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED OR METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA IN THE NETHERLANDS
    Klijn, S.
    Van de Wetering, G.
    Malcolm, B.
    Dale, P.
    Pompen, M.
    Stevanovic, J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S46 - S46
  • [33] Nivolumab and ipilimumab therapy for advanced melanoma
    Burki, Talha Khan
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (08): : E298 - E298
  • [34] Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma
    Wolchok, Jedd D.
    Kluger, Harriet
    Callahan, Margaret K.
    Postow, Michael A.
    Rizvi, Naiyer A.
    Lesokhin, Alexander M.
    Segal, Neil H.
    Ariyan, Charlotte E.
    Gordon, Ruth-Ann
    Reed, Kathleen
    Burke, Matthew M.
    Caldwell, Anne
    Kronenberg, Stephanie A.
    Agunwamba, Blessing U.
    Zhang, Xiaoling
    Lowy, Israel
    Inzunza, Hector David
    Feely, William
    Horak, Christine E.
    Hong, Quan
    Korman, Alan J.
    Wigginton, Jon M.
    Gupta, Ashok
    Sznol, Mario
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 369 (02): : 122 - 133
  • [35] Ipilimumab plus nivolumab for advanced melanoma
    Hassel, Jessica C.
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (11): : 1471 - 1472
  • [36] Five-Year Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma
    Larkin, J.
    Chiarion-Sileni, V.
    Gonzalez, R.
    Grob, J-J
    Rutkowski, P.
    Lao, C. D.
    Cowey, C. L.
    Schadendorf, D.
    Wagstaff, J.
    Dummer, R.
    Ferrucci, P. F.
    Smylie, M.
    Hogg, D.
    Hill, A.
    Marquez-Rodas, I.
    Haanen, J.
    Guidoboni, M.
    Maio, M.
    Schoffski, P.
    Carlino, M. S.
    Lebbe, C.
    McArthur, G.
    Ascierto, P. A.
    Daniels, G. A.
    Long, G. V.
    Bastholt, L.
    Rizzo, J. I.
    Balogh, A.
    Moshyk, A.
    Hodi, F. S.
    Wolchok, J. D.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 381 (16): : 1535 - 1546
  • [37] Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab Is an Effective Treatment for Melanoma Brain Metastases
    Traylor, Jeffrey I.
    Kuo, John S.
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 84 (03) : E134 - E135
  • [38] Cabozantinib and nivolumab as first-line treatment in advanced renal cell carcinoma
    Vitale, Maria Giuseppa
    Nasso, Cecilia
    Oltrecolli, Marco
    Baldessari, Cinzia
    Fanelli, Martina
    Dominici, Massimo
    Sabbatini, Roberto
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2021, 21 (11) : 1183 - 1192
  • [39] Nivolumab versus ipilimumab in the treatment of advanced melanoma: a critical appraisal
    Wan, M. T.
    Ming, M. E.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2018, 179 (02) : 296 - 300
  • [40] Bempegaldesleukin Plus Nivolumab in First-Line Metastatic Melanoma
    Diab, Adi
    Tykodi, Scott S.
    Daniels, Gregory A.
    Maio, Michele
    Curti, Brendan D.
    Lewis, Karl D.
    Jang, Sekwon
    Kalinka, Ewa
    Puzanov, Igor
    Spira, Alexander, I
    Cho, Daniel C.
    Guan, Shanhong
    Puente, Erika
    Tuan Nguyen
    Hoch, Ute
    Currie, Sue L.
    Lin, Wei
    Tagliaferri, Mary A.
    Zalevsky, Jonathan
    Sznol, Mario
    Hurwitz, Michael E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (26) : 2914 - +