Economic evaluation of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab in the first-line treatment of advanced melanoma in Japan

被引:11
|
作者
Paly, Victoria Federico [1 ]
Hikichi, Yusuke [2 ]
Baker, Timothy [1 ]
Itakura, Eijun [2 ]
Chandran, Nisha [3 ]
Harrison, James [2 ]
机构
[1] ICON Plc, Global HTA Hlth Econ Reimbursement & Outcomes, New York, NY USA
[2] Bristol Myers Squibb KK, Tokyo, Japan
[3] ICON Plc, Global HTA Hlth Econ Reimbursement & Outcomes, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
关键词
Melanoma; immuno-oncology; cost-effectiveness; Japan; nivolumab; ipilimumab; PD-1; PHASE-II; SURVIVAL; TRIALS; EFFICACY; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1080/13696998.2020.1830781
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Aims The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab (nivo + ipi) compared to current therapeutic alternatives in first-line treatment of patients with advanced melanoma from the Japanese national healthcare payer perspective using 48-month survival data from the CheckMate 067 Phase III trial. Materials and methods A three-state partitioned survival model was developed from projections of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) to estimate accrued quality-adjusted survival and costs over a 30-year time horizon. The analysis included nivo + ipi, nivolumab, and ipilimumab monotherapies (the three treatments included in CheckMate 067). Drug acquisition, administration, disease management, subsequent therapy, and adverse event (AE) costs were obtained via published sources and expert input (solicited via Delphi panel). AE frequencies were collected from the Checkmate 067 trial. Utility weights were estimated from the Checkmate 067 trial, based on Japanese tariffs. Results were presented as incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs, cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY)). Results Nivo + ipi had the greatest estimated survival among the three competing treatments, followed by nivolumab monotherapy accruing the second greatest survival. The incremental cost-effectiveness of nivo + ipi was yen 778,000 per QALY vs. nivolumab and yen 1,584,000 per QALY vs. ipilimumab. The results indicate that nivo + ipi is cost-effective in Japan when compared to a threshold of yen 7,500,000 per QALY. This finding was found to be generally robust to sensitivity and scenario analyses. Limitations Limitations include uncertainty in long-term survival extrapolations and lack of Japan-specific clinical data. Conclusions This analysis indicates that adding ipilimumab to nivolumab therapy represents a cost-effective new treatment option for patients with unresectable malignant melanoma in Japan.
引用
收藏
页码:1542 / 1552
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combination as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced Melanoma in Canada
    Peter L. Quon
    Ying Xiao
    Sonja Sorensen
    Amir Abbas Tahami Monfared
    [J]. PharmacoEconomics - Open, 2019, 3 : 321 - 331
  • [2] Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combination as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced Melanoma in Canada
    Quon, Peter L.
    Xiao, Ying
    Sorensen, Sonja
    Monfared, Amir Abbas Tahami
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS-OPEN, 2019, 3 (03) : 321 - 331
  • [3] ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF NIVOLUMAB (NIVO) PLUS IPILIMUMAB (IPI) COMBINATION AS FIRST-LINE TREATMENT FOR PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED MELANOMA IN CANADA
    Quon, P.
    Xiao, Y.
    Sorensen, S.
    Schultz, M.
    Monfared, Tahami A. A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (09) : A441 - A442
  • [4] Ipilimumab, nivolumab and tocilizumab as first-line therapy for advanced melanoma.
    Mehmi, Inderjit
    Hamid, Omid
    Hodi, F. Stephen
    Vassalo, Melinda
    Malatyali, Saundra
    Krishnarajapet, Swathi
    O'Donnell, Nan
    Castrence, Angeli
    Lim, Eunice
    Gormley, Jill
    Weber, Jeffrey S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)
  • [5] Combined ipilimumab and nivolumab first-line and after BRAF-targeted therapy in advanced melanoma
    Mason, Robert
    Dearden, Helen C.
    Nguyen, Bella
    Soon, Jennifer A.
    Smith, Jessica Louise
    Randhawa, Manreet
    Mant, Andrew
    Warburton, Lydai
    Lo, Serigne
    Meniawy, Tarek
    Guminski, Alexander
    Parente, Phillip
    Ali, Sayed
    Haydon, Andrew
    Long, Georgina V.
    Carlino, Matteo S.
    Millward, Michael
    Atkinson, Victoria G.
    Menzies, Alexander M.
    [J]. PIGMENT CELL & MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2020, 33 (02) : 358 - 365
  • [6] Economic evaluation of ipilimumab in first line treatment of advanced melanoma in Italy
    De Francesco, Maria
    Lamotte, Mark
    Ascierto, Paolo Antonio
    Di Rienzo, Paolo
    Asukai, Yumi
    [J]. GLOBAL & REGIONAL HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2016, 3 (02) : 67 - 79
  • [7] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF NIVOLUMAB IN COMBINATION WITH IPILIMUMAB IN FIRST-LINE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED MELANOMA IN SWEDEN
    Baker, T. M.
    Paly, V. F.
    Thybo, S.
    Hultberg, M.
    Minacori, R.
    Kotapati, S.
    Sabater, J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A730 - A731
  • [8] Combined ipilimumab and nivolumab first-line and after BRAF-directed targeted therapies in advanced melanoma patients
    Dearden, H. C.
    Mason, R.
    Nguyen, B.
    Soon, J. A.
    Smith, J. L.
    Randhawa, M.
    Mant, A.
    Warburton, L.
    Lo, S.
    Meniawy, T.
    Guminski, A.
    Parente, P.
    Ali, S.
    Haydon, A.
    Long, G. V.
    Carlino, M. S.
    Millward, M.
    Atkinson, V. G.
    Menzies, A. M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 : 448 - 448
  • [9] Ipilimumab Combined with Nivolumab: A Standard of Care for the Treatment of Advanced Melanoma?
    Carlino, Matteo S.
    Long, Georgina V.
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 22 (16) : 3992 - 3998
  • [10] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF NIVOLUMAB plus IPILIMUMAB IN FIRST -LINE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED MELANOMA
    Baker, T. M.
    Paly, V. F.
    Sabater, J.
    Okoro, T.
    Kotapati, S.
    Briggs, A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A730 - A730