Risk-controlled economic performance of compressed air energy storage and wind generation in day-ahead, intraday and balancing markets

被引:10
|
作者
Sriyakul, Thanaporn [1 ]
Jermsittiparsert, Kittisak [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Mahanakorn Univ Technol, Fac Business Adm, Bangkok 10530, Thailand
[2] Duy Tan Univ, Inst Res & Dev, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
[3] Duy Tan Univ, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
[4] Henan Univ Econ & Law, MBA Sch, Zhengzhou 450046, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
Commercial compressed air energy storage (CCAES); Wind generation; Power aggregator (PA); Downside risk constraints approach (DRCA); Day-ahead (DA) and intraday (IN) and balancing (BL) markets; DEMAND RESPONSE; BIDDING STRATEGY; POWER; OPTIMIZATION; OPERATION; CAES;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2020.11.025
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this paper, the wind power aggregator is cooperating with a commercial compressed air energy storage (CCAES) to participate in three markets, including day-ahead (DA), intraday (IN), and balancing (BL) markets. A three-stage stochastic programming problem is formulated to model the optimal operation of the proposed system. In the proposed model, the uncertainties of wind power, as well as DA, IN, and BL markets price is modeled by the implementation of scenario generation and reduction methods. Financial risks imposed from the uncertain parameters are investigated in the proposed stochastic optimization framework. For this purpose, the downside risk constraints approach (DRCA) is modeled in the stochastic formulation to manage the financial risks. In the proposed DRCA, a risk-based strategy can be proposed for the aggregation of CCAES and wind as a power aggregator (PA) that has a controlled risk in the risk-averse strategy. According to obtained results, the expected profit of PA without DRCA is (sic) 4176.3, while the proposed strategy by the DRCA leads to a (sic) 4094.0 profit. Therefore the proposed strategy by DRCA has a lower profit (1.97%) while leads to a guaranteed risk-controlled strategy for PA with the reduced risk by 100%. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 193
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Virtual Energy Storage Stacking in Day-Ahead and mFRR markets - A Spanish Case Study
    Paredes, Angel
    Aguado, Jose A.
    Rodriguez, Pedro
    IEEE 15TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON POWER ELECTRONICS FOR DISTRIBUTED GENERATION SYSTEMS, PEDG 2024, 2024,
  • [32] Evaluation of the uncertainty in the scheduling of a wind and storage power plant participating in day-ahead and reserve markets
    Crespo-Vazquez, Jose L.
    Carrillo, C.
    Diaz-Dorado, E.
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, ICEER 2017, 2017, 136 : 73 - 78
  • [33] Maximizing the Revenue of Energy Storage Participants in Day-Ahead and Real-Time Markets
    Vejdan, Sadegh
    Grijalva, Santiago
    2018 CLEMSON UNIVERSITY POWER SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (PSC), 2018,
  • [34] Dynamic Energy Balancing Cost Model for Day Ahead Markets With Uncertain Wind Energy and Generation Contingency Under Demand Response
    Konda, Srikanth Reddy
    Mukkapati, Balaji
    Panwar, Lokesh Kumar
    Panigrahi, Bijaya Ketan
    Kumar, Rajesh
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 2018, 54 (05) : 4908 - 4916
  • [35] Risk-constrained day-ahead scheduling for gravity energy storage system and wind turbine based on IGDT
    Wu, Xiong
    Li, Nailiang
    He, Mingkang
    Wang, Xiuli
    Ma, Song
    Cao, Jingjing
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 185 : 904 - 915
  • [36] Stochastic coordination of joint wind and photovoltaic systems with energy storage in day-ahead market
    Gomes, I. L. R.
    Pousinho, H. M. I.
    Melicio, R.
    Mendes, V. M. F.
    ENERGY, 2017, 124 : 310 - 320
  • [37] Energy storage sizing for wind power: impact of the autocorrelation of day-ahead forecast errors
    Haessig, Pierre
    Multon, Bernard
    Ben Ahmed, Hamid
    Lascaud, Stephane
    Bondon, Pascal
    WIND ENERGY, 2015, 18 (01) : 43 - 57
  • [38] Wind power with energy storage arbitrage in day-ahead market by a stochastic MILP approach
    Gomes I.L.R.
    Melicio R.
    Mendes V.M.F.
    Pousinho H.M.I.
    Logic Journal of the IGPL, 2021, 28 (04) : 570 - 582
  • [39] Wind Power with Energy Storage Arbitrage in Day-ahead Market by a Stochastic MILP Approach
    Gomes, I. L. R.
    Melicio, R.
    Mendes, V. M. F.
    Pousinho, H. M., I
    LOGIC JOURNAL OF THE IGPL, 2020, 28 (04) : 570 - 582
  • [40] Reserve Model of Energy Storage in Day-Ahead Joint Energy and Reserve Markets: A Stochastic UC Solution
    Tang, Zao
    Liu, Yikui
    Wu, Lei
    Liu, Junyong
    Gao, Hongjun
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2021, 12 (01) : 372 - 382