A comparison of ecotoxicological tests

被引:13
|
作者
Botsford, JL [1 ]
机构
[1] New Mexico State Univ, Dept Biol, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA
来源
ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS | 2002年 / 30卷 / 05期
关键词
bacterial indicator; ecotoxicity testing; indicator organism; Sinorhizobium meliloti;
D O I
10.1177/026119290203000507
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
A simple, inexpensive and rapid method of determining toxicity by using a bacterium as the indicator organism was developed and compared with 23 other tests. The average correlation coefficient when comparing these 23 tests with the present test was 0.800, ranging from 0.580 to 0.950. Eleven of the tests were compared in detail by using 35 of the chemicals on the Multicentre Evaluation of In Vitro Cytotoxicity list of test chemicals. Comparing results from the present test with test results for these 35 chemicals with Microtox(TM), Biotox(TM), Daphnia magna, rat hepatocytes and ascites tumour cell resulted in correlation coefficients ranging from 0.871 to 0.933. Comparisons of the test data with rodent LD50 values, human lethal dose estimates from autopsies and human lethal doses obtained from the literature provided correlation coefficients ranging from 0.580 to 0.770, indicating that the test compares less favourably with these methods. This test provides data comparable to data from other ecotoxicological tests.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 550
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Is pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) a good plant species for ecotoxicological tests?
    Silva Q.M.
    Andrade-Vieria L.F.
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (29) : 41953 - 41963
  • [32] Assessing the safety of Pseudomonas putida introduction in the environment: An overview of ecotoxicological tests
    de Castro, Vera Lucia S. S.
    Jonsson, Claudio Martin
    Silva, Celia Maria M.
    Nunes Maia, Aline de Holanda
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 56 (03) : 300 - 305
  • [33] Comparison of different biological methods for the assessment of ecotoxicological risks
    Fenske, Christiane
    Daeschlein, Georg
    Guenther, Burkhart
    Knauer, Angelika
    Rudolph, Peter
    Schwahn, Christian
    Adrian, Vera
    von Woedtke, Thomas
    Rossberg, Harald
    Juelich, Wolf-Dieter
    Kramer, Axel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYGIENE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2006, 209 (03) : 275 - 284
  • [34] ECOTOXICOLOGICAL EFFECTS ASSESSMENT - A COMPARISON OF SEVERAL EXTRAPOLATION PROCEDURES
    OKKERMAN, PC
    VANDERPLASSCHE, EJ
    SLOOFF, W
    VANLEEUWEN, CJ
    CANTON, JH
    ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 1991, 21 (02) : 182 - 193
  • [35] Ecotoxicological assessment of chemotherapeutic agents using toxicity tests with embryos of Mellita quinquiesperforata
    Mello, Luiza Costa
    da Fonseca, Taina Garcia
    de Souza, Abessa Denis Moledode
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2020, 159
  • [36] Evaluation of bioremediation process efficiency: Contribution of analytical, microbiological, molecular and ecotoxicological tests
    Ducrocq, V
    Hallier-Soulier, S
    Pandard, P
    Thybaud, E
    Truffaut, N
    CONTAMINATED SOIL '98, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1998, : 959 - 960
  • [37] Methodological optimization for ecotoxicological community tests with Enchytraeids—extraction procedures and sampling effort
    Douglas Alexandre
    Luís Carlos Iuñes de Oliveira Filho
    Pâmela Niederauer Pompeo
    Cintia Carla Niva
    José Paulo Sousa
    Osmar Klauberg-Filho
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2025, 32 (13) : 8307 - 8317
  • [38] Suitability of Daphnia similis as an alternative organism in ecotoxicological tests: implications for metal toxicity
    Suzelei Rodgher
    Evaldo Luiz Gaeta Espíndola
    Ana Teresa Lombardi
    Ecotoxicology, 2010, 19 : 1027 - 1033
  • [39] Assessment of the effects of Cr, Cu, Ni and Pb soil contamination by ecotoxicological tests
    Maisto, Giulia
    Manzo, Sonia
    De Nicola, Flavia
    Carotenuto, Rita
    Rocco, Annamaria
    Alfani, Anna
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2011, 13 (11): : 3049 - 3056
  • [40] Web portal for management of bioindication methods and ecotoxicological tests in ecological risk assessment
    R. Smid
    M. Kubasek
    D. Klimes
    L. Dusek
    J. Jarkovsky
    B. Marsalek
    K. Hilscherova
    L. Blaha
    P. Cupr
    I. Holoubek
    Ecotoxicology, 2006, 15 : 623 - 627