Assessing the roles of wolves and dogs in livestock predation with suggestions for mitigating human-wildlife conflict and conservation of wolves

被引:14
|
作者
Plumer, Liivi [1 ]
Talvi, Tonu [2 ]
Mannil, Peep [3 ]
Saarma, Urmas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tartu, Inst Ecol & Earth Sci, Dept Zool, Vanemuise 46, EE-51014 Tartu, Estonia
[2] Estonian Environm Board, Narva Mnt 7a, EE-15172 Tallinn, Estonia
[3] Estonian Environm Agcy, Mustamae Tee 33, EE-10616 Tallinn, Estonia
关键词
Canis familiaris; Canis lupus; European Union policy; Livestock predation; MtDNA; Saliva samples; IDENTIFICATION; CARNIVORE; LANDSCAPES; ATTITUDES; RECOVERY; CROATIA; COYOTE; SHEEP; RISK; SEX;
D O I
10.1007/s10592-017-1045-4
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Predation on livestock is a cause of serious and long-lasting conflict between farmers and wildlife, promoting negative public attitudes and endangering conservation of large carnivores. However, while large carnivores, especially the grey wolf (Canis lupus), are often blamed for killing sheep and other farm animals, free-ranging dogs may also act as predators. To develop appropriate measures for livestock protection, reliable methods for identifying predator species are critical. Identification of predators from visual examination of livestock wounds can be ambiguous and genetic analysis is strongly preferable for accurate species determination. To estimate the proportion of wolves and dogs implicated in sheep predation, we developed a sensitive genetic assay to distinguish between wolves and domestic dogs. A total of 183 predator saliva samples collected from killed sheep in Estonia were analysed. The assay identified the predator species in 143 cases (78%). Sheep were most often killed by wolves (81%); however, predation by dogs was substantial (15%). We compared the molecular results with field observations conducted by local environmental officials and recorded some disagreement, with the latter underestimating the role of dogs. As predator saliva samples collected from prey are often of poor quality, we suggest using mitochondrial DNA as a primary tool to maximise the number of successfully analysed samples. We also suggest adopting forensic DNA analysis more widely in livestock predation assessments as a legislative measure since misidentification that is biased against wolves can be counterproductive for conservation by enhancing conflict with society and leading to increased culling and poaching.
引用
收藏
页码:665 / 672
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing the roles of wolves and dogs in livestock predation with suggestions for mitigating human–wildlife conflict and conservation of wolves
    Liivi Plumer
    Tõnu Talvi
    Peep Männil
    Urmas Saarma
    [J]. Conservation Genetics, 2018, 19 : 665 - 672
  • [2] Wolves of the Sea: Managing human-wildlife conflict in an increasingly tense ocean
    Guerra, Ana Sofia
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2019, 99 : 369 - 373
  • [3] Patterns of Livestock Predation by Carnivores: Human-Wildlife Conflict in Northwest Yunnan, China
    Li, Xueyou
    Buzzard, Paul
    Chen, Yongchun
    Jiang, Xuelong
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 52 (06) : 1334 - 1340
  • [4] Human-wildlife conflict in the Kingdom of Bhutan: Patterns of livestock predation by large mammalian carnivores
    Sangay, Tiger
    Vernes, Karl
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2008, 141 (05) : 1272 - 1282
  • [5] Beyond Tolerance: Mitigating Human-Wildlife Conflict with Hospitality
    Serenari, Christopher
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2024, 14 (08):
  • [6] Understanding human-wildlife conflict in Nepal and its mitigating measures
    Gaire, Asmita
    Acharya, Krishna Prasad
    [J]. ISRAEL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2024, 70 (1-2) : 69 - 74
  • [7] Bayesian Networks for Understanding Human-Wildlife Conflict in Conservation
    Davis, Jac
    Good, Kyle
    Hunter, Vanessa
    Johnson, Sandra
    Mengersen, Kerrie L.
    [J]. CASE STUDIES IN APPLIED BAYESIAN DATA SCIENCE: CIRM JEAN-MORLET CHAIR, FALL 2018, 2020, 2259 : 347 - 370
  • [8] Livestock guardian dogs establish a landscape of fear for wild predators: Implications for the role of guardian dogs in reducing human-wildlife conflict and supporting biodiversity conservation
    van Bommel, Linda
    Magrath, Michael
    Coulson, Graeme
    Johnson, Chris N.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS AND EVIDENCE, 2024, 5 (01):
  • [9] Bad Wolves? Political Ecology of Responsibility and More-Than-Human Perspectives in Human-Wildlife Interactions
    Komi, Sanna
    Nygren, Anja
    [J]. SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2023, 36 (10) : 1238 - 1256
  • [10] No single solution: application of behavioural principles in mitigating human-wildlife conflict
    Blackwell, Bradley F.
    DeVault, Travis L.
    Fernandez-Juricic, Esteban
    Gese, Eric M.
    Gilbert-Norton, Lynne
    Breck, Stewart W.
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2016, 120 : 245 - 254