Insurance status predicts survival for trauma patients undergoing urgent intervention

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between insurance status and outcomes for trauma patients presenting without vital signs undergoing urgent intervention. Materials and methods: The National Trauma Data Bank was queried for patients presenting with a systolic blood pressure equal to zero and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of three ("clinically dead"), who underwent urgent thoracotomy and-or laparotomy (UTL). Insured patients were compared with uninsured (INS [-]) patients. Results: There were 18,171 patients presenting clinically dead having a payment source documented. INS (-) patients were more likely to undergo UTL (5.4% [416-7704] versus 2.7% [285-10,467], 1.481 [1.390-1.577], < 0.001). Out of 689 patients who underwent UTL and meeting inclusion criteria, 416 (60.4%) were INS (-). Patients with insurance demonstrated a significantly greater survival (9.9% [27-273] versus 1.7% [7-416], 5.878 [2.596-13.307] P < 0.001). Adjusting for mechanism, race, age, injury severity, and comorbidities, insured status was independently associated with survival. Conclusions: The presence of health insurance is independently associated with survival in trauma patients presenting with cardiovascular collapse who undergo urgent surgical intervention. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.