Mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus versus tacrolimus alone for the treatment of idiopathic membranous glomerulonephritis: a randomised controlled trial

被引:18
|
作者
Nikolopoulou, Aikaterini [1 ]
Condon, Marie [2 ]
Turner-Stokes, Tabitha [1 ]
Cook, H. Terence [1 ]
Duncan, Neill [2 ]
Galliford, Jack W. [2 ]
Levy, Jeremy B. [2 ]
Lightstone, Liz [1 ]
Pusey, Charles D. [1 ]
Roufosse, Candice [1 ]
Cairns, Thomas D. [2 ]
Griffith, Megan E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Ctr Inflammatory Dis, Div Immunol & Inflammat, Dept Med, Du Cane Rd, London W12 0NN, England
[2] Hammersmith Hosp, Imperial Coll Healthcare NHS Trust, Imperial Coll Renal & Transplant Ctr, London W12 0NN, England
关键词
Membranous nephropathy; Nephrotic syndrome; Relapse; Mycophenolate mofetil; Tacrolimus; Randomised controlled trial; LONG-TERM; NEPHROPATHY; CYCLOSPORINE; RITUXIMAB; IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; COMBINATION; MONOTHERAPY; THERAPY; TARGET;
D O I
10.1186/s12882-019-1539-z
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Tacrolimus (TAC) is effective in treating membranous nephropathy (MN); however relapses are frequent after treatment cessation. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to examine whether the addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to TAC would reduce relapse rate. Methods Forty patients with biopsy proven idiopathic MN and nephrotic syndrome were randomly assigned to receive either TAC monotherapy (n = 20) or TAC combined with MMF (n = 20) for 12 months. When patients had been in remission for 1 year on treatment the MMF was stopped and the TAC gradually withdrawn in both groups over 6 months. Patients also received supportive treatment with angiotensin blockade, statins, diuretics and anticoagulation as needed. Primary endpoint was relapse rate following treatment withdrawal. Secondary outcomes were remission rate, time to remission and change in renal function. Results 16/20 (80%) of patients in the TAC group achieved remission compared to 19/20 (95%) in the TAC/MMF group (p = 0.34). The median time to remission in the TAC group was 54 weeks compared to 40 weeks in the TAC/MMF group (p = 0.46). There was no difference in the relapse rate between the groups: 8/16 (50%) patients in the TAC group relapsed compared to 8/19 (42%) in the TAC/MMF group (p = 0.7). The addition of MMF to TAC did not adversely affect the safety of the treatment. Conclusions Addition of MMF to TAC does not alter the relapse rate of nephrotic syndrome in patients with MN.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine with mycophenolate mofetil in cadaveric renal transplant recipients with delayed graft function
    Liu, B
    Lin, ZB
    Ming, CS
    Zhang, WJ
    Chen, ZS
    Sha, B
    Zeng, FJ
    Chen, S
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 35 (01) : 87 - 88
  • [22] Cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease
    Loftus, CG
    Egan, LJ
    Sandborn, WJ
    GASTROENTEROLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2004, 33 (02) : 141 - +
  • [23] Long-term outcome of a randomised controlled trial comparing tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil as induction therapy for active lupus nephritis
    Mok, Chi Chiu
    Ho, Ling Yin
    Ying, Shirley King Yee
    Leung, Man Chi
    To, Chi Hung
    Ng, Woon Leung
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2020, 79 (08) : 1070 - 1076
  • [24] Tacrolimus (FK506) and mycophenolate mofetil combination therapy versus tacrolimus in adult liver transplantation
    Eckhoff, DE
    McGuire, BM
    Frenette, LR
    Contreras, JL
    Hudson, SL
    Bynon, JS
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 65 (02) : 180 - 187
  • [25] Treatment of idiopathic membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids
    Jones, G
    Juszczak, M
    Kingdon, E
    Harber, M
    Sweny, P
    Burns, A
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 19 (12) : 3160 - 3164
  • [26] Comparison of disease activity between tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in lupus nephritis: a randomized controlled trial
    Kamanamool, N.
    Ingsathit, A.
    Rattanasiri, S.
    Ngamjanyaporn, P.
    Kasitanont, N.
    Chawanasuntorapoj, R.
    Pichaiwong, W.
    Anutrakulchai, S.
    Sangthawan, P.
    Ophascharoensuk, V.
    Avihingsanon, Y.
    Sumethkul, V.
    LUPUS, 2018, 27 (04) : 647 - 656
  • [27] A prospective randomized trial of tacrolimus and prednisone versus tacrolimus, prednisone, and mycophenolate mofetil in primary adult liver transplant recipients - An interim report
    Jain, AB
    Hamad, I
    Rakela, J
    Dodson, F
    Kramer, D
    Demetris, J
    McMichael, J
    Starzl, TE
    Fung, JJ
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 66 (10) : 1395 - 1398
  • [28] Prospective randomized trial of tacrolimus and prednisone versus tacrolimus, prednisone, and mycophenolate mofetil: Complete report on 350 primary adult liver transplantations
    Jain, A
    Kashyap, R
    Kramer, D
    Dodson, F
    Hamad, I
    Starzl, TE
    Fung, JJ
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (1-2) : 1342 - 1344
  • [29] A prospective randomized trial of tacrolimus and prednisone versus tacrolimus, prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil in primary adult liver transplantation: A single center report
    Jain, A
    Kashyap, R
    Dodson, F
    Kramer, D
    Hamad, I
    Khan, A
    Eghestad, B
    Starzl, TE
    Fung, JJ
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 72 (06) : 1091 - 1097
  • [30] A Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil to Tacrolimus and Methotrexate for Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis
    Perkins, Janelle
    Field, Teresa
    Kim, Jongphil
    Kharfan-Dabaja, Mohamed A.
    Fernandez, Hugo
    Ayala, Ernesto
    Perez, Lia
    Xu, Mian
    Alsina, Melissa
    Ochoa, Leonel
    Sullivan, Daniel
    Janssen, William
    Anasetti, Claudio
    BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 16 (07) : 937 - 947