An embedded randomised controlled trial of a Teaser Campaign to optimise recruitment in primary care

被引:3
|
作者
Lee, Hopin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Huebscher, Markus [1 ,2 ]
Moseley, G. Lorimer [1 ,4 ]
Kamper, Steven J. [5 ]
Traeger, Adrian C. [1 ,2 ]
Skinner, Ian W. [1 ,2 ]
Williams, Christopher M. [3 ]
McAuley, James H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Neurosci Res Australia NeuRA, Barker St, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Prince Wales Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Newcastle & Hunter New England Local Hlth Di, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Hunter Med Res Inst, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ South Australia, Sansom Inst Hlth Res, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Primary health care; recruitment; randomised controlled trial; research methods; back pain; IMPROVING RECRUITMENT; CLINICAL-TRIAL; BRAND IDENTITY; DIFFICULTIES; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1177/1740774516683921
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Marketing communication and brand identity is a fundamental principle of advertising and end-user engagement. Health researchers have begun to apply this principle to trial recruitment in primary care. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a Teaser Campaign using a series of postcards in advance of a conventional mail-out increases the number of primary care clinics that engage with a clinical trial. Methods: Embedded randomised recruitment trial across primary care clinics (general practitioners and physiotherapists) in the Sydney metropolitan area. Clinics in the Teaser Campaign group received a series of branded promotional postcards in advance of a standard letter inviting them to participate in a clinical trial. Clinics in the Standard Mail group did not receive the postcards. Results: From a total of 744 clinics that were sent an invitation letter, 46 clinics in the Teaser Campaign group and 40 clinics in the Standard Mail group responded (11.6% total response rate). There was no between-group difference in the odds of responding to the invitation letter (odds ratio = 1.18, 95% confidence interval = 0.75-1.85, p = 0.49). For physiotherapy clinics and general practice clinics, the odds ratios were 1.43 (confidence interval = 0.82-2.48, p = 0.21) and 0.77 (confidence interval = 0.34-1.75, p = 0.54), respectively. Conclusion: A Teaser Campaign using a series of branded promotional postcards did not improve clinic engagement for a randomised controlled trial in primary care.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 169
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The impact of advertising patient and public involvement on trial recruitment: embedded cluster randomised recruitment trial
    Hughes-Morley, Adwoa
    Hann, Mark
    Fraser, Claire
    Meade, Oonagh
    Lovell, Karina
    Young, Bridget
    Roberts, Chris
    Cree, Lindsey
    More, Donna
    O'Leary, Neil
    Callaghan, Patrick
    Waheed, Waquas
    Bower, Peter
    TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [22] OPTIMISE: a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomised trial of an intervention to improve primary care for refugees in Australia
    Russell, Grant M.
    Long, Katrina
    Lewis, Virginia
    Enticott, Joanne C.
    Gunatillaka, Nilakshi
    Cheng, I--Hao
    Marsh, Geraldine
    Vasi, Shiva
    Advocat, Jenny
    Saito, Shoko
    Song, Hyun
    Casey, Sue
    Smith, Mitchell
    Harris, Mark F.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2021, 215 (09) : 420 - 426
  • [23] The effect of personalised versus non-personalised study invitations on recruitment within the ENGAGE feasibility trial: an embedded randomised controlled recruitment trial
    Thiblin, Ella
    Woodford, Joanne
    Ohman, Mattias
    von Essen, Louise
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [24] The effect of personalised versus non-personalised study invitations on recruitment within the ENGAGE feasibility trial: an embedded randomised controlled recruitment trial
    Ella Thiblin
    Joanne Woodford
    Mattias Öhman
    Louise von Essen
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 22
  • [25] Preventing injuries in children: cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care
    Kendrick, D
    Marsh, P
    Fielding, K
    Miller, P
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 318 (7189): : 980 - 983
  • [26] Interdisciplinary COPD intervention in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial
    Liang, Jenifer
    Abramson, Michael J.
    Russell, Grant
    Holland, Anne E.
    Zwar, Nicholas A.
    Bonevski, Billie
    Mahal, Ajay
    Eustace, Paula
    Paul, Eldho
    Phillips, Kirsten
    Cox, Narelle S.
    Wilson, Sally
    George, Johnson
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2019, 53 (04)
  • [27] Oral ondansetron for paediatric gastroenteritis in primary care: a randomised controlled trial
    Bonvanie, Irma J.
    Weghorst, Anouk Ah
    Holtman, Gea A.
    Russchen, Heleen A.
    Fickweiler, Freek
    Verkade, Henkjan J.
    Kollen, Boudewijn J.
    Berger, Marjolein Y.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2021, 71 (711): : E728 - E735
  • [28] Treatment of anxiety disorders in primary care practice: a randomised controlled trial
    van Boeijen, CA
    van Oppen, P
    van Balkom, AJLM
    Visser, S
    Kempe, PT
    Blankenstein, N
    van Dyck, R
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2005, 55 (519): : 763 - 769
  • [29] Weight loss maintenance in primary health care: a randomised controlled trial
    de Freitas, Patricia Pinheiro
    Lopes, Mariana Souza
    Lopes, Aline Critine Souza
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2024, 132 (09) : 1255 - 1266
  • [30] (PAMS Award) - Randomised controlled trial of hip protectors in primary care
    Birks, Y
    Porthouse, J
    Addie, C
    Loughney, K
    Saxon, L
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 14 : S14 - S14