Development of a consensus approach for botanical safety evaluation - A roundtable report

被引:9
|
作者
Galli, Corrado L. [1 ]
Walker, Nigel J. [2 ]
Oberlies, Nicholas H. [3 ]
Roe, Amy L. [4 ]
Edwards, James [5 ]
Fitzpatrick, Suzanne [6 ]
Griffiths, James C. [7 ]
Hayes, A. Wallace [8 ]
Mahony, Catherine [9 ]
Marsman, Daniel S. [4 ]
O'Keeffe, Lara [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Milan, Italy
[2] NTP NIEHS, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[3] Univ North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC USA
[4] Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH USA
[5] DSM Nutr Prod, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland
[6] FDA CFSAN, College Pk, MD USA
[7] Council Responsible Nutr Int, Washington, DC USA
[8] Michigan State Univ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[9] Procter & Gamble, Egham, Surrey, England
关键词
Consensus; Botanical; Food/dietary supplement; Decision tree; Threshold of toxicological concern; In silico; Botanical-drug interactions; ADME natural products; Complex mixtures; Constituent characterization; INGREDIENTS; MUSHROOMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.toxlet.2019.05.008
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
Botanical safety science continues to evolve as new tools for risk assessment become available alongside continual desire by consumers for "natural" botanical ingredients in consumer products. Focusing on botanical food/dietary supplements a recent international roundtable meeting brought together scientists to discuss the needs, available tools, and ongoing data gaps in the botanical safety risk assessment process. Participants discussed the key elements of botanical safety evaluations. They provided perspective on the use of a decision tree methodology to conduct a robust risk assessment and concluded with alignment on a series of consensus statements. This discussion highlighted the strengths and vulnerabilities in common assumptions, and the participants shared additional perspective to ensure that this end-to-end safety approach is sufficient, actionable and timely. Critical areas and data gaps were identified as opportunities for future focus. These include, better context on history of use, systematic assessment of weight of evidence, use of in silico approaches, inclusion of threshold of toxicological concern considerations, individual substances/matrix interactions of plant constituents, assessing botanical-drug interactions and adaptations needed to apply to in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic modelling of botanical constituents.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 17
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of a systematic approach in variant management for safety-critical systems development
    Kaessmeyer, Michael
    Moncada, David Santiago Velasco
    Schurius, Markus
    PROCEEDINGS IEEE/IFIP 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMBEDDED AND UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING 2015, 2015, : 35 - 43
  • [22] Updated approach for the management of osteoporosis in Turkey: a consensus report
    Yeşim Kirazlı
    Funda Atamaz Çalış
    Özlem El
    Yeşim Gökçe Kutsal
    Özlen Peker
    Dilsad Sindel
    Şansın Tuzun
    Dilek Gogas Yavuz
    Berrin Durmaz
    Ülkü Akarirmak
    Hatice Bodur
    Vedat Hamuryudan
    Umit Inceboz
    Sema Öncel
    Archives of Osteoporosis, 2020, 15
  • [23] Updated approach for the management of osteoporosis in Turkey: a consensus report
    Kirazli, Yesim
    Calis, Funda Atamaz
    El, Ozlem
    Kutsal, Yesim Gokce
    Peker, Ozlen
    Sindel, Dilsad
    Tuzun, Sansin
    Yavuz, Dilek Gogas
    Durmaz, Berrin
    Akarirmak, Ulku
    Bodur, Hatice
    Hamuryudan, Vedat
    Inceboz, Umit
    Oncel, Sema
    ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [24] Scientific and Regulatory Approach to Botanical Drug Development: A US FDA Perspective
    Wu, Charles
    Lee, Su-Lin
    Taylor, Cassandra
    Li, Jing
    Chan, Yen-Ming
    Agarwal, Rajiv
    Temple, Robert
    Throckmorton, Douglas
    Tyner, Katherine
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL PRODUCTS, 2020, 83 (02): : 552 - 562
  • [25] DO CONSENSUS CONFERENCES WORK - A PROCESS EVALUATION OF THE NIH CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
    WORTMAN, PM
    SECHREST, L
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW, 1988, 13 (03) : 469 - 498
  • [26] Fire safety evaluation approach and software of petrochemical enterprises I. Fire safety evaluation approach
    Zhao, MX
    Wu, LZ
    Shang, KD
    Liu, YX
    Li, YD
    PROGRESS IN SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL III, PTS A AND B, 2002, 3 : 1004 - 1007
  • [27] Therapeutic Development Paths for Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease: Report of a Regulatory Roundtable
    Eberling, Jamie
    Vincent, Lona
    Goldman, Jennifer G.
    Weintraub, Daniel
    Kulisevsky, Jaime
    Marras, Connie
    Stebbins, Glenn
    Kieburtz, Karl
    JOURNAL OF PARKINSONS DISEASE, 2014, 4 (04) : 585 - 589
  • [28] Safety of Cranberry: Evaluation of Evidence of Kidney Stone Formation and Botanical Drug-Interactions #
    Madden, Emily
    McLachlan, Caleb
    Oketch-Rabah, Hellen
    Calderon, Angela I.
    PLANTA MEDICA, 2021, 87 (10/11) : 803 - 817
  • [29] Consumer and farmer safety evaluation of application of botanical pesticides in black pepper crop protection
    Hernandez-Moreno, David
    Soffers, Ans E. M. F.
    Wiratno
    Falke, Hein E.
    Rietjens, Ivonne M. C. M.
    Murk, Albertinka J.
    FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2013, 56 : 483 - 490
  • [30] Recommendations for safety planning, data collection, evaluation and reporting during drug, biologic and vaccine development: a report of the safety planning, evaluation, and reporting team
    Crowe, Brenda J.
    Xia, H. Amy
    Berlin, Jesse A.
    Watson, Douglas J.
    Shi, Hongliang
    Lin, Stephen L.
    Kuebler, Juergen
    Schriver, Robert C.
    Santanello, Nancy C.
    Rochester, George
    Porter, Jane B.
    Oster, Manfred
    Mehrotra, Devan V.
    Li, Zhengqing
    King, Eileen C.
    Harpur, Ernest S.
    Hall, David B.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2009, 6 (05) : 430 - 440