Role of DNA damage response pathways in preventing carcinogenesis caused by intrinsic replication stress

被引:16
|
作者
Wallace, M. D. [1 ,2 ]
Southard, T. L. [1 ,3 ]
Schimenti, K. J. [1 ]
Schimenti, J. C. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Coll Vet Med, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Dept Mol Biol & Genet, Ithaca, NY USA
[3] Sect Anat Pathol, Ithaca, NY USA
[4] Cornell Univ, Ctr Vertebrate Genom, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
DNA replication; DNA damage checkpoints; minichromosome maintenance proteins; 9-1-1; MCM2-7; helicase; replication stress; ATAXIA-TELANGIECTASIA; BREAST-CANCER; TUMOR SUSCEPTIBILITY; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; IONIZING-RADIATION; MOUSE MODEL; ATM; MICE; CHK2; PHOSPHORYLATION;
D O I
10.1038/onc.2013.339
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Defective DNA replication can result in genomic instability, cancer and developmental defects. To understand the roles of DNA damage response (DDR) genes on carcinogenesis in mutants defective for core DNA replication components, we utilized the Mcm4Chaos3/Chaos3 ('Chaos3') mouse model that, by virtue of an amino-acid alteration in MCM4 that destabilizes the MCM2-7 DNA replicative helicase, has fewer dormant replication origins and an increased number of stalled replication forks. This leads to genomic instability and cancer in most Chaos3 mice. We found that animals doubly mutant for Chaos3 and components of the ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) double-strand break response pathway (Atm, p21/Cdkn1a and Chk2/Chek2) had decreased tumor latency and/or increased tumor susceptibility. Tumor latency and susceptibility differed between genetic backgrounds and genders, with females demonstrating an overall greater cancer susceptibility to Atm and p21 deficiency than males. Atm deficiency was semilethal in the Chaos3 background and impaired embryonic fibroblast proliferation, suggesting that ATM drug inhibitors might be useful against tumors with DNA replication defects. Hypomorphism for the 9-1-1 component Hus1 did not affect tumor latency or susceptibility in Chaos3 animals, and tumors in these mice did not exhibit impaired ATR pathway signaling. These and other data indicate that under conditions of systemic replication stress, the ATM pathway is particularly important both for cancer suppression and viability during development.
引用
收藏
页码:3688 / 3695
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Roles of SPOP in DNA Damage Response and DNA Replication
    Maekawa, Masashi
    Higashiyama, Shigeki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2020, 21 (19) : 1 - 13
  • [32] Interplay between DNA replication and the DNA damage response
    Petermann, Eva
    Jones, Rebecca M.
    Orta, Manuel L.
    Issaeva, Natalia
    Schultz, Niklas
    Afzal, Islam
    Helleday, Thomas
    MUTAGENESIS, 2012, 27 (01) : 108 - 109
  • [33] A role of the mitotic spindle checkpoint in the cellular response to DNA replication stress
    Duensing, Anette
    Teng, Xiaoyi
    Liu, Ying
    Tseng, Michelle
    Spardy, Nicole
    Duensing, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY, 2006, 99 (03) : 759 - 769
  • [34] Role of c-Abl in the DNA damage stress response
    Shaul, Y
    Ben-Yehoyada, M
    CELL RESEARCH, 2005, 15 (01) : 33 - 35
  • [35] Comprehensive analysis of the DNA damage repair and maintenance pathways that regulate TNBC sensitivity to replication stress
    Redwood, Abena B.
    Seth, Sahil
    Cai, Shirong
    Piwnica-Worms, Helen
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 78 (04)
  • [36] Comprehensive analysis of the DNA damage repair and maintenance pathways that regulate TNBC sensitivity to replication stress
    Redwood, A. B.
    Cai, S.
    Jeter-Jones, S.
    Tu, Y.
    Piwnica-Worms, H.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77
  • [37] DNA Damage Response Pathways in Dinoflagellates
    Li, Chongping
    Wong, Joseph Tin Yum
    MICROORGANISMS, 2019, 7 (07)
  • [38] Role of c-Abl in the DNA damage stress response
    Yosef SHAUL
    Merav BEN-YEHOYADA
    CellResearch, 2005, (01) : 33 - 35
  • [39] Role of c-Abl in the DNA damage stress response
    Yosef SHAUL
    Merav BEN-YEHOYADA
    Cell Research, 2005, 15 : 33 - 35
  • [40] Dissecting the DNA replication stress response
    Brown, Grant
    YEAST, 2015, 32 : S31 - S31