Hydrogen production by steam reforming of acetic acid and bio-oil using Ni/γ-Al2O3 catalysts

被引:3
|
作者
Li Yanmei [1 ,2 ]
Fu Peng [1 ,2 ]
Yi Weiming [1 ,2 ]
Bai Xueyuan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ Technol, Sch Agr & Food Engn, Zibo 255049, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Res Ctr Engn & Technol Clean Energy, Zibo 255049, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
hydrogen; bio-oil; Ni/gamma-Al2O3; catalyst; steam reforming; acetic acid; MODEL-COMPOUND; FUEL-CELLS; ETHANOL; BIOMASS; NICKEL;
D O I
10.3965/j.ijabe.20150806.1277
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Hydrogen production from steam reforming of bio-oil and acetic acid using Ni/gamma-Al2O3 catalyst was studied in a laboratory-scale fixed bed reactor. This study selected different Ni loadings (16.8% and 30.5%) in Ni/gamma-Al2O3 catalysts and reaction temperatures (500 degrees C, 600 degrees C and 700 degrees C) as variables to optimize the hydrogen yield and selectivity of gases formed. Experiments were carried out in an isothermal manner. The catalysts were prepared on wet impregnation of a gamma-Al2O3 which supported with two different Ni loadings. The principal gases generated were H-2, CO, CO2 and CH4. The results from steam reforming of acetic acid showed that the yield and selectivity of hydrogen using the catalyst with 30.5% Ni were significantly higher than that with 16.8% Ni. The results showed that the most favorable temperature for hydrogen production was 600 degrees C, and the steam reforming of bio-oil using Ni/gamma-Al2O3 catalyst with 30.5% Ni showed that the yields and selectivity of H-2 and CO2 increased with the temperature increasing while CH4 and CO selectivity decreased. These results showed that the most favorable temperature for hydrogen production from bio-oil using 30.5% Ni/gamma-Al2O3 was 600 degrees C, at which hydrogen yield was at its maximum of 65%.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 76
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hydrogen production from bio-oil model compounds dry (CO2) reforming over Ni/Al2O3 catalyst
    Fu, Ming
    Qi, Wei
    Xu, Qingli
    Zhang, Suping
    Yan, Yongjie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2016, 41 (03) : 1494 - 1501
  • [32] Production of hydrogen via steam reforming of bio-oil over Ni-based catalysts: Effect of support
    Azad, Fakhry Seyedeyn
    Abedi, Jalal
    Salehi, Ebrahim
    Harding, Thomas
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2012, 180 : 145 - 150
  • [33] Renewable hydrogen production via steam reforming of simulated bio-oil over Ni-based catalysts
    Italiano, C.
    Bizkarra, K.
    Barrio, V. L.
    Cambra, J. F.
    Pino, L.
    Vita, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (29) : 14671 - 14682
  • [34] Steam reforming of simulated bio-oil on K-Ni-Cu-Mg-Ce-O/Al2O3: The effect of K
    Yu, Ning
    Rahman, Muhammad Mahfuzur
    Chen, Jixiang
    Sun, Junming
    Engelhard, Mark
    Hernandez, Xavier Isidro Pereira
    Wang, Yong
    CATALYSIS TODAY, 2019, 323 : 183 - 190
  • [35] Catalytic steam reforming of acetic acid as a model compound of bio-oil
    Nogueira, Francisco Guilherme E.
    Assaf, Paulo G. M.
    Carvalho, Hudson W. P.
    Assaf, Elisabete M.
    APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL, 2014, 160 : 188 - 199
  • [36] Effect of calcination temperature of Ni/γ-Al2O3 catalyst on the steam reforming of acetic acid
    An, Lu
    Dong, Changqing
    Zhang, Junjiao
    Yang, Yongping
    2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE POWER GENERATION AND SUPPLY, VOLS 1-4, 2009, : 1885 - 1891
  • [37] Kinetic model considering catalyst deactivation for the steam reforming of bio-oil over Ni/La2O3-αAl2O3
    Gayubo, Ana G.
    Valle, Beatriz
    Aramburu, Borja
    Montero, Carolina
    Bilbao, Javier
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2018, 332 : 192 - 204
  • [39] Hydrogen Production by Steam Reforming of Ethanol Over Mesoporous Ni–Al2O3–ZrO2 Catalysts
    Ji Hwan Song
    Seung Ju Han
    In Kyu Song
    Catalysis Surveys from Asia, 2017, 21 : 114 - 129
  • [40] Progress in hydrogen production by steam catalytic reforming of bio-oil
    Wang Z.
    Sun L.
    Chen L.
    Yang S.
    Xie X.
    Zhao B.
    Si H.
    Hua D.
    Huagong Jinzhan/Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40 (01): : 151 - 163