Primary Care Providers' Perceptions About Participating in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Treatment Decisions

被引:2
|
作者
Radhakrishnan, Archana [1 ]
Wallner, Lauren P. [1 ,2 ]
Skolarus, Ted A. [3 ,4 ]
Abrahamse, Paul H. [1 ]
Kollipara, Adam S. [1 ]
Katz, Steven J. [1 ,5 ]
Hawley, Sarah T. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Epidemiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Ann Arbor VA Ctr Clin Management Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Hlth Management & Policy, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; decision-making; primary care; watchful waiting; SURVIVORSHIP CARE; MEDICAL ONCOLOGISTS; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; PHYSICIANS; ATTITUDES; BREAST; INVOLVEMENT; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-020-06318-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Primary care provider's (PCP) role in cancer care is expanding and may include supporting patients in their treatment decisions. However, the degree to which PCPs engage in this role for low-risk prostate cancer is unknown. Objective Characterize PCP perceptions regarding their role in low-risk prostate cancer treatment decision-making. Design Cross-sectional, national survey. Main Measures For men with low-risk prostate cancer, PCP reports of (1) confidence in treatment decision-making (high vs. low); (2) intended participation in key aspects of active surveillance treatment decision-making (more vs. less). Key Results A total of 347 from 741 eligible PCPs responded (adjusted response rate 56%). Half of respondent PCPs (50.3%) reported high confidence about engaging in low-risk prostate cancer treatment decision-making. The odds of PCPs reporting high confidence were greater among those in solo practice (vs working with > 1 PCP) (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.14-4.17) and with higher volume of prostate cancer patients (> 15 vs. 6-10 in past year) (OR 2.16; 95% CI 1.02-4.61). PCP report of their intended participation in key aspects of active surveillance treatment decision-making varied: discussing worry (62.4%), reviewing benefits (48.5%) and risks (41.8%), and reviewing all treatment options (34.2%). PCPs who reported high confidence had increased odds of more participation in all aspects of active surveillance decision-making: reviewing all treatment options (OR 3.11; 95% CI 1.82-5.32), discussing worry (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.28-3.51), and reviewing benefits (OR 3.13; 95% CI 1.89-5.16) and risks (OR 3.20; 95% CI 1.91-5.36). Conclusions The majority of PCPs were confident about engaging with patients in low-risk prostate cancer treatment decision-making, though their intended participation varied widely across four key aspects of active surveillance care. With active surveillance being considered for other low-risk cancers (such as breast and thyroid), understanding factors influencing PCP involvement will be instrumental to supporting team-based cancer care.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 454
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Laurence Klotz
    [J]. Current Urology Reports, 2015, 16
  • [42] Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Klotz, Laurence
    [J]. CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 16 (04) : 1 - 10
  • [43] Low-risk prostate cancer: to treat or not to treat
    Freedland, Stephen J.
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2017, 18 (02): : 156 - 157
  • [44] Management dilemmas in low-risk prostate cancer
    Patel, Vipul R.
    Ganapathi, Hariharan Palayapalayam
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 118 (02) : 180 - 181
  • [45] Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Bul, Meelan
    van der Kwast, Theo H.
    Pickles, Tom
    Korfage, Ida J.
    Hoeks, Caroline M.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Jenster, Guido
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Bellardita, Lara
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Denis, Louis J.
    Parker, Chris
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Emberton, Mark
    Klotz, Laurence H.
    Rannikko, Antti
    Kakehi, Yoshiyuki
    Lane, Janet A.
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    Semjonow, Axel
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Valdagni, Riccardo
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2013, 85 (03) : 295 - 302
  • [46] Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Hadjipavlou, Marios
    Promponas, John
    Madaan, Sanjeev
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2015, 8 (06) : 420 - 428
  • [47] Very low-risk versus low-risk prostate cancer: A distinction worth keeping
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    [J]. PROSTATE, 2021, 81 (13): : 923 - 925
  • [48] Multidisciplinary care and pursuit of active surveillance in low-risk prostate cancer.
    Aizer, Ayal
    Paly, Jonathan J.
    Zietman, Anthony L.
    D'Amico, Anthony Victor
    Nguyen, Paul Linh
    Beard, Clair
    Rao, Sandhya K.
    Kaplan, Irving D.
    Hirsch, Michelle S.
    Wu, Chin-Lee
    Efstathiou, Jason Alexander
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (05)
  • [49] Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate in low-risk patients does not affect PSA failure and treatment decisions
    Semba, R.
    Uchida, K.
    Shiraishi, T.
    Onishi, T.
    Sasaki, T.
    Inoue, T.
    Watanabe, M.
    [J]. VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2022, 481 (SUPPL 1) : S171 - S171
  • [50] A 64-Year-Old Man With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Review of Prostate Cancer Treatment
    Sanda, Martin G.
    Kaplan, Irving D.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 301 (20): : 2141 - 2151