Primary Care Providers' Perceptions About Participating in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Treatment Decisions

被引:2
|
作者
Radhakrishnan, Archana [1 ]
Wallner, Lauren P. [1 ,2 ]
Skolarus, Ted A. [3 ,4 ]
Abrahamse, Paul H. [1 ]
Kollipara, Adam S. [1 ]
Katz, Steven J. [1 ,5 ]
Hawley, Sarah T. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Epidemiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Ann Arbor VA Ctr Clin Management Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Hlth Management & Policy, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; decision-making; primary care; watchful waiting; SURVIVORSHIP CARE; MEDICAL ONCOLOGISTS; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; PHYSICIANS; ATTITUDES; BREAST; INVOLVEMENT; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-020-06318-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Primary care provider's (PCP) role in cancer care is expanding and may include supporting patients in their treatment decisions. However, the degree to which PCPs engage in this role for low-risk prostate cancer is unknown. Objective Characterize PCP perceptions regarding their role in low-risk prostate cancer treatment decision-making. Design Cross-sectional, national survey. Main Measures For men with low-risk prostate cancer, PCP reports of (1) confidence in treatment decision-making (high vs. low); (2) intended participation in key aspects of active surveillance treatment decision-making (more vs. less). Key Results A total of 347 from 741 eligible PCPs responded (adjusted response rate 56%). Half of respondent PCPs (50.3%) reported high confidence about engaging in low-risk prostate cancer treatment decision-making. The odds of PCPs reporting high confidence were greater among those in solo practice (vs working with > 1 PCP) (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.14-4.17) and with higher volume of prostate cancer patients (> 15 vs. 6-10 in past year) (OR 2.16; 95% CI 1.02-4.61). PCP report of their intended participation in key aspects of active surveillance treatment decision-making varied: discussing worry (62.4%), reviewing benefits (48.5%) and risks (41.8%), and reviewing all treatment options (34.2%). PCPs who reported high confidence had increased odds of more participation in all aspects of active surveillance decision-making: reviewing all treatment options (OR 3.11; 95% CI 1.82-5.32), discussing worry (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.28-3.51), and reviewing benefits (OR 3.13; 95% CI 1.89-5.16) and risks (OR 3.20; 95% CI 1.91-5.36). Conclusions The majority of PCPs were confident about engaging with patients in low-risk prostate cancer treatment decision-making, though their intended participation varied widely across four key aspects of active surveillance care. With active surveillance being considered for other low-risk cancers (such as breast and thyroid), understanding factors influencing PCP involvement will be instrumental to supporting team-based cancer care.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 454
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Primary Care Providers’ Perceptions About Participating in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Treatment Decisions
    Archana Radhakrishnan
    Lauren P. Wallner
    Ted A. Skolarus
    Paul H. Abrahamse
    Adam S. Kollipara
    Steven J. Katz
    Sarah T. Hawley
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2021, 36 : 447 - 454
  • [2] PRIMARY CARE PROVIDERS' PERCEPTIONS ABOUT PARTICIPATING IN LOW-RISK PROSTATE CANCER TREATMENT DECISION MAKING
    Radhakrishnan, Archana
    Wallner, Lauren P.
    Skolarus, Ted A.
    Abrahamse, Paul
    Kollipara, Adam
    Katz, Steven
    Hawley, Sarah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (SUPPL 1) : S242 - S242
  • [3] TREATMENT DECISIONS AMONG MEN WITH LOW-RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Taylor, Kathryn L.
    Van Den Eeden, S.
    Hoffman, R.
    Leimpeter, A.
    Tomko, C.
    Shan, J.
    Davis, K.
    Aaronson, D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2013, 45 : S256 - S256
  • [4] TREATMENT DECISIONS AMONG MEN WITH LOW-RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Hoffman, Richard
    Van den Eeden, Stephen K.
    Leimpeter, Amethyst
    Tomko, Catherine
    Davis, Kimberly
    Shan, Jun
    Taylor, Kathryn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 28 : S225 - S225
  • [5] IMPACT OF PRIMARY CARE PROVIDERS ON TREATMENT DECISIONS FOR MEN WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER
    Radhakrishnan, Archana
    Grande, David
    Crossette, Linda
    Bekelman, Justin
    Pollack, Craig E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 31 : S264 - S264
  • [6] Focal treatment for low-risk prostate cancer
    Katz, Aaron E.
    Kacker, Ravi
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 102 (02) : 158 - 159
  • [7] Treatment options for low-risk prostate cancer
    Yuxuan Song
    Tao Xu
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2022, 40 : 2827 - 2828
  • [8] Treatment options for low-risk prostate cancer
    Song, Yuxuan
    Xu, Tao
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (11) : 2827 - 2828
  • [9] Understanding the impact of primary care providers on treatment decisions for men with localized prostate cancer.
    Radhakrishnan, Archana
    Grande, David
    Crossette, Linda
    Bekelman, Justin E.
    Pollack, Craig Evan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (03)
  • [10] The Influence of Emotions on Treatment Decisions About Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer: A Qualitative Study
    Pitt, Susan C.
    Saucke, Megan C.
    Roman, Benjamin R.
    Alexander, Stewart C.
    Voils, Corrine, I
    [J]. THYROID, 2021, 31 (12) : 1800 - 1807