NON-MARKET METHODS IN OPEN MARKET ECONOMY: SOUTH KOREAN EXPERIENCE

被引:0
|
作者
Ozols, Andris [1 ]
机构
[1] Daugavpils Univ, LV-1035 Riga, Latvia
关键词
non-market methods; economy of South Korea; catching up development;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Within last decades South Korea achieved prominent results in economical and social development. Started from very law positions (GDP less than in Somalia and Afghanistan in 1960s) it became a member of OECD in 1996 and the 14th world economy in 2010. Being a great example of catching up development South Korea used various activities and ways to promote its economical and social growth and always managed to combine open market economy with non-market methods, like: direct administration of markets; direct and indirect agriculture protectionism; protection of big companies (chaebols) and small business, using customs tariffs, tax incentives, state credits, support of exporters; development of new labour ethics; using of Labour Law for support of industry; increase of human capital based on reforms of education; information component of industrialization and modernization, including creative use of historical background, articulated state ideology, clear verbalization of aims and targets. In times of globalization innovations become the key ingredient for economical and social growth. According to ideas of J. Schumpeter, the main target of innovations is to get the oligopolistic rent over the market profit. Such rent is shared between entrepreneurs, banks, workers and the state. Therefore, as "a stakeholder" of innovative development the government of South Korea does its best to support all kinds of innovations and to protect innovative companies using non-market methods as well. The aim of the research is to study and summarize South Korean experience in use of non-market methods for development of a modern knowledge-based economy. The main tasks were to define the most important non-market methods and their impact to Korean economy. Studying, adoption and implementation of the best world practice may help Latvia and its regions to catch up developed economies faster, avoiding extra expenses and losses inherent to pioneers.
引用
收藏
页码:530 / 538
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE NON-MARKET DRIVER OF A MIXED ECONOMY
    Mamedov, Oktay
    [J]. TERRA ECONOMICUS, 2018, 16 (01): : 6 - 19
  • [2] Non-market strategies and disruptive innovation in the platform economy
    Khan, Zaheer
    Zeng, Jing
    Knight, Gary
    Rajwani, Tazeeb
    Pattnaik, Chinmay
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 29 (05)
  • [3] Foreign Aid and Fiscal Policy in a Small-Open Economy with a Non-Market Sector
    Cui, Naiyue
    Hu, Yunfang
    [J]. FOREIGN TRADE REVIEW, 2023, 58 (01) : 144 - 175
  • [4] Non-Market Motivation of the Art Market
    Mocnik, Rastko
    [J]. ZIVOT UMJETNOSTI, 2019, (104): : 66 - 85
  • [5] Measuring Non-market Transaction Costs in Chinese Economy
    Da, Fengyuan
    Zhang, Weidong
    Wu, Jun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMANITIES, HISTORICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2010, : 663 - 667
  • [6] The sharing economy in social media: Analyzing tensions between market and non-market logics
    Laurell, Christofer
    Sandstrom, Christian
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2017, 125 : 58 - 65
  • [7] Social media analytics for knowledge acquisition of market and non-market perceptions in the sharing economy
    Geissinger, Andrea
    Laurell, Christofer
    oberg, Christina
    Sandstrom, Christian
    Sick, Nathalie
    Suseno, Yuliani
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 25 (02) : 500 - 512
  • [8] NON-MARKET PRICING IN SOCIALIST WORLD MARKET
    BRYSON, PJ
    VANBRABANT, JM
    [J]. KYKLOS, 1975, 28 (02) : 309 - 336
  • [9] Market, Non-Market and Anti-Market Processes in Neoliberalism
    Mercille, Julien
    Murphy, Enda
    [J]. CRITICAL SOCIOLOGY, 2019, 45 (7-8) : 1093 - 1109
  • [10] Toward a Polanyian network analysis: market and non-market forms of coordination in the rice economy of Vietnam
    Prota, Laura
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 16 (06) : 1135 - 1160