Delayed effects of attention on pain sensitivity and conditioned pain modulation

被引:17
|
作者
Hoegh, Morten [1 ]
Seminowicz, David A. [1 ,2 ]
Graven-Nielsen, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, SMI, Ctr Neuroplast & Pain CNAP, Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Dent, Ctr Adv Chron Pain Res, Dept Neural & Pain Sci, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE; CENTRAL SENSITIZATION; BOTTOM-UP; TOP-DOWN; RELIABILITY; STROOP; TASK; INHIBITION; INTERFERENCE; FIBROMYALGIA;
D O I
10.1002/ejp.1458
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Efficacy of pain modulation is assessed as the difference in pain sensitivity during a painful conditioning, compared to before (conditioning pain modulation, CPM). Attention can be assessed with the Stroop task, in which participants report the number of words on a screen; either congruent or incongruent with the value of the words. Attention away from painful stimuli during CPM enhances the CPM effect. However, it is unknown if attention influences CPM effects when the two are done in sequence. Methods Healthy men (n = 25) underwent cuff algometry CPM-assessment where the pressure-pain detection and tolerance thresholds (PTT) were recorded on one leg with and without contralateral conditioning. Two identical sessions of four test stimuli equal to PTT (5 s, 1-min interval, scored on a visual analogue scale, VAS) with a painful conditioning from the second to the last test-stimulus were performed. Stroop sessions were followed by test stimuli with or without painful conditioning. Results The VAS scores in the first two sessions showed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.92). VAS scores were lower in sessions with Stroop compared to sessions without Stroop (p = .05) indicating an analgesic effect of Stroop. Participants were subgrouped into CPM responders and CPM non-responders according to CPM effects in the first two sessions. CPM non-responders (n = 13) showed facilitation to repeated noxious stimuli in all sessions with no effect of conditioning or Stroop (p = .02). Conclusion Attention and CPM both modulate pain in healthy men. Attention-induced analgesia works in CPM non-responders. Results indicate that attention and CPM are not the same and that they do not demonstrate additive effects when applied in sequence. Significance Pain sensitivity is reduced after an attention task in healthy men. The delayed effects from attention only have minor effects on Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM), and results support that attention-driven analgesia works independently of CPM. Results indicate that individual strategies for pain inhibition exist and that an overlap between the mechanisms of CPM and selective attention is limited. Moreover, painful phasic stimuli may increase the number of healthy volunteers with negative CPM effects.
引用
收藏
页码:1850 / 1862
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Associations of pain sensitivity and conditioned pain modulation with physical activity: findings from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST)
    Lee, Soyoung
    Neogi, Tuhina
    Mcginley, Brooke
    Wang, Na
    Law, Laura Frey
    Torabian, Kaveh A.
    Aoyagi, Kosaku
    Stefanik, Joshua J.
    Carlesso, Lisa C.
    Hausdor, Jeffrey M.
    Gazit, Eran
    Segal, Neil A.
    Lewis, Cora E.
    Nevitt, Michael C.
    Kumar, Deepak
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2024, 32 (08) : 982 - 989
  • [42] Relationships of abdominal pain, reports to visceral and temperature pain sensitivity, conditioned pain modulation, and heart rate variability in irritable bowel syndrome
    Jarrett, M. E.
    Han, C. J.
    Cain, K. C.
    Burr, R. L.
    Shulman, R. J.
    Barney, P. G.
    Naliboff, B. D.
    Zia, J.
    Heitkemper, M. M.
    [J]. NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2016, 28 (07): : 1094 - 1103
  • [43] Physical Activity, Heat Pain, And Conditioned Pain Modulation In Women With And Without Disabling Pain
    Adrian, Amanda L.
    O'Connor, Patrick J.
    Ward-Ritacco, Christie L.
    Evans, Ellen M.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2014, 46 (05): : 689 - 689
  • [44] Pain facilitation and pain inhibition during conditioned pain modulation in fibromyalgia and in healthy controls
    Potvin, Stephane
    Marchand, Serge
    [J]. PAIN, 2016, 157 (08) : 1704 - 1710
  • [45] IS PAIN CATASTROPHISING ASSOCIATED WITH IMPAIRED CONDITIONED PAIN MODULATION IN PEOPLE WITH CHRONIC WIDESPREAD PAIN?
    Rice, D.
    Parker, R.
    Lewis, G.
    McNair, P.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2016, 75 : 390 - 390
  • [46] Effect of Pain Induction or Pain Reduction on Conditioned Pain Modulation in Adults: A Systematic Review
    Goubert, Dorien
    Danneels, Lieven
    Cagnie, Barbara
    Van Oosterwijck, Jessica
    Kolba, Kim
    Noyez, Heleen
    Meeus, Mira
    [J]. PAIN PRACTICE, 2015, 15 (08) : 765 - 777
  • [47] Pleasant Pain Relief and Inhibitory Conditioned Pain Modulation: A Psychophysical Study
    Bitar, Nathalie
    Marchand, Serge
    Potvin, Stephane
    [J]. PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2018, 2018
  • [48] Conditioned pain modulation and offset analgesia: Different avenues to inhibit pain
    King, Christopher D.
    [J]. PAIN, 2014, 155 (12) : 2444 - 2445
  • [49] Conditioned Pain Modulation in Patients With Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain
    Mlekusch, Sabine
    Neziri, Alban Y.
    Limacher, Andreas
    Jueni, Peter
    Arendt-Nielsen, Lars
    Curatolo, Michele
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2016, 32 (02): : 116 - 121
  • [50] Somatosensory assessment and conditioned pain modulation in temporomandibular disorders pain patients
    Kothari, Simple Futarmal
    Baad-Hansen, Lene
    Oono, Yuka
    Svensson, Peter
    [J]. PAIN, 2015, 156 (12) : 2545 - 2555