Delayed effects of attention on pain sensitivity and conditioned pain modulation

被引:17
|
作者
Hoegh, Morten [1 ]
Seminowicz, David A. [1 ,2 ]
Graven-Nielsen, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, SMI, Ctr Neuroplast & Pain CNAP, Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Dent, Ctr Adv Chron Pain Res, Dept Neural & Pain Sci, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE; CENTRAL SENSITIZATION; BOTTOM-UP; TOP-DOWN; RELIABILITY; STROOP; TASK; INHIBITION; INTERFERENCE; FIBROMYALGIA;
D O I
10.1002/ejp.1458
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Efficacy of pain modulation is assessed as the difference in pain sensitivity during a painful conditioning, compared to before (conditioning pain modulation, CPM). Attention can be assessed with the Stroop task, in which participants report the number of words on a screen; either congruent or incongruent with the value of the words. Attention away from painful stimuli during CPM enhances the CPM effect. However, it is unknown if attention influences CPM effects when the two are done in sequence. Methods Healthy men (n = 25) underwent cuff algometry CPM-assessment where the pressure-pain detection and tolerance thresholds (PTT) were recorded on one leg with and without contralateral conditioning. Two identical sessions of four test stimuli equal to PTT (5 s, 1-min interval, scored on a visual analogue scale, VAS) with a painful conditioning from the second to the last test-stimulus were performed. Stroop sessions were followed by test stimuli with or without painful conditioning. Results The VAS scores in the first two sessions showed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.92). VAS scores were lower in sessions with Stroop compared to sessions without Stroop (p = .05) indicating an analgesic effect of Stroop. Participants were subgrouped into CPM responders and CPM non-responders according to CPM effects in the first two sessions. CPM non-responders (n = 13) showed facilitation to repeated noxious stimuli in all sessions with no effect of conditioning or Stroop (p = .02). Conclusion Attention and CPM both modulate pain in healthy men. Attention-induced analgesia works in CPM non-responders. Results indicate that attention and CPM are not the same and that they do not demonstrate additive effects when applied in sequence. Significance Pain sensitivity is reduced after an attention task in healthy men. The delayed effects from attention only have minor effects on Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM), and results support that attention-driven analgesia works independently of CPM. Results indicate that individual strategies for pain inhibition exist and that an overlap between the mechanisms of CPM and selective attention is limited. Moreover, painful phasic stimuli may increase the number of healthy volunteers with negative CPM effects.
引用
收藏
页码:1850 / 1862
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The relationship between sensitivity to pain and conditioned pain modulation in healthy people
    Grouper, Hadas
    Eisenberg, Elon
    Pud, Droit
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2019, 708
  • [2] Pain Modulation: From Conditioned Pain Modulation to Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Experimental and Clinical Pain
    Damien, Janie
    Colloca, Luana
    Bellei-Rodriguez, Carmen-Edith
    Marchand, Serge
    [J]. NEUROBIOLOGY OF THE PLACEBO EFFECT, PT II, 2018, 139 : 255 - 296
  • [3] Adaptations in Evoked Pain Sensitivity and Conditioned Pain Modulation after Development of Chronic Neck Pain
    Shahidi, Bahar
    Maluf, Katrina S.
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 2017
  • [4] Conditioned pain modulation and pain sensitivity in functional somatic disorders: The DanFunD study
    Petersen, Marie Weinreich
    Skovbjerg, Sine
    Jensen, Jens Sondergaard
    Carstensen, Tina Birgitte Wisbech
    Dantoft, Thomas Meinertz
    Fink, Per
    Benros, Michael Eriksen
    Mortensen, Erik Lykke
    Jorgensen, Torben
    Gormsen, Lise Kirstine
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2022, 26 (01) : 154 - 166
  • [5] Conditioned pain modulation
    Nir, Rony-Reuven
    Yarnitsky, David
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN SUPPORTIVE AND PALLIATIVE CARE, 2015, 9 (02) : 131 - 137
  • [6] Effects of dexmedetomidine on conditioned pain modulation in humans
    Baba, Y.
    Kohase, H.
    Oono, Y.
    Fujii-Abe, K.
    Arendt-Nielsen, L.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2012, 16 (08) : 1137 - 1147
  • [7] Race Effects on Conditioned Pain Modulation in Youth
    Morris, Matthew C.
    Walker, Lynn
    Bruehl, Stephen
    Hellman, Natalie
    Sherman, Amanda L.
    Rao, Uma
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2015, 16 (09): : 873 - 880
  • [8] Acute alcohol effects on conditioned pain modulation, but not temporal summation of pain
    Horn-Hofmann, Claudia
    Capito, Eva Susanne
    Wolstein, Joerg
    Lautenbacher, Stefan
    [J]. PAIN, 2019, 160 (09) : 2063 - 2071
  • [9] Racial differences in experimental pain sensitivity and conditioned pain modulation: a study of Chinese and Indians
    Ng, Tze Siong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2019, 12 : 2193 - 2200
  • [10] Conditioned pain modulation and pain sensitivity in functional somatic syndromes. The DanFunD study
    Skovbjerg, S.
    Carstensen, T.
    Fink, P.
    Eplov, L. F.
    Mortensen, E. L.
    Eliasen, M. H.
    Dantoft, T. M.
    Jorgensen, T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2018, 109 : 136 - 136