Specific Binding of Tetratricopeptide Repeat Proteins to Heat Shock Protein 70 (Hsp70) and Heat Shock Protein 90 (Hsp90) Is Regulated by Affinity and Phosphorylation

被引:82
|
作者
Assimon, Victoria A. [1 ]
Southworth, Daniel R. [1 ]
Gestwicki, Jason E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Program Chem Biol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Pharmaceut Chem, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
STEROID-RECEPTOR COMPLEXES; MOLECULAR CHAPERONE HSC70; TPR-CONTAINING PROTEINS; E3 UBIQUITIN LIGASE; GLUCOCORTICOID-RECEPTOR; CANCER-CELLS; CLIENT PROTEINS; CHIP; DOMAIN; HOP;
D O I
10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00801
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) and heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) require the help of tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domain-containing cochaperones for many of their functions. Each monomer of Hsp70 or Hsp90 can interact with only a single TPR cochaperone at a time, and each member of the TPR cochaperone family brings distinct functions to the complex. Thus, competition for TPR binding sites on Hsp70 and Hsp90 appears to shape chaperone activity. Recent structural and biophysical efforts have improved our understanding of chaperone TPR contacts, focusing on the C-terminal EEVD motif that is present in both chaperones. To better understand these important protein-protein interactions on a wider scale, we measured the affinity of five TPR cochaperones, CHIP, Hop, DnaJC7, FKBP51, and FKBP52, for the C-termini of four members of the chaperone family, Hsc70, Hsp72, Hsp90 alpha, and Hsp90 beta, in vitro. These studies identified some surprising selectivity among the chaperone-TPR pairs, including the selective binding of FKBP51/52 to Hsp90 alpha/beta. These results also revealed that other TPR cochaperones are only able to weakly discriminate between the chaperones or between their paralogs. We also explored whether mimicking phosphorylation of serine and threonine residues near the EEVD motif might impact affinity and found that pseudophosphorylation had selective effects on binding to CHIP but not other cochaperones. Together, these findings suggest that both intrinsic affinity and post-translational modifications tune the interactions between the Hsp70 and Hsp90 proteins and the TPR cochaperones.
引用
收藏
页码:7120 / 7131
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Heat Shock Protein 90 (Hsp90) in Fungal Growth and Pathogenesis
    Lamoth F.
    Juvvadi P.R.
    Steinbach W.J.
    Current Fungal Infection Reports, 2014, 8 (4) : 296 - 301
  • [42] Redefining the Phenotype of Heat Shock Protein 90 (Hsp90) Inhibitors
    Wang, Yao
    Koay, Yen Chin
    McAlpine, Shelli R.
    CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL, 2017, 23 (09) : 2010 - 2013
  • [43] Hsp70 and Hsp90 -: a relay team for protein folding
    Wegele, H
    Müller, L
    Buchner, J
    REVIEWS OF PHYSIOLOGY, BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 151 : 1 - 44
  • [44] Characterization of the nucleotide binding properties of the 90 kDa heat shock protein (Hsp90)
    Csaba Sőti
    Péter Csermely
    Journal of Biosciences, 1998, 23 : 347 - 352
  • [45] Characterization of the nucleotide binding properties of the 90 kDa heat shock protein (Hsp90)
    Soti, C
    Csermely, P
    JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCES, 1998, 23 (04) : 347 - 352
  • [46] Heat Shock Protein 90 (Hsp90) Expression and Breast Cancer
    Zagouri, Flora
    Bournakis, Evangelos
    Koutsoukos, Konstantinos
    Papadimitriou, Christos A.
    PHARMACEUTICALS, 2012, 5 (09): : 1008 - 1020
  • [48] Hsp90 and Hsp70 chaperones: Collaborators in protein remodeling
    Genest, Olivier
    Wickner, Sue
    Doyle, Shannon M.
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2019, 294 (06) : 2109 - 2120
  • [49] Heat Shock Protein 70 (Hsp70) as an Emerging Drug Target
    Evans, Christopher G.
    Chang, Lyra
    Gestwicki, Jason E.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2010, 53 (12) : 4585 - 4602
  • [50] C-terminal sequences of hsp70 and hsp90 as non-specific anchors for tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) proteins
    Ramsey, Andrew J.
    Russell, Lance C.
    Chinkers, Michael
    BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 423 : 411 - 419