Stillbirth evaluation: a stepwise assessment of placental pathology and autopsy

被引:35
|
作者
Miller, Emily S. [1 ]
Minturn, Lucy [2 ]
Linn, Rebecca [2 ]
Weese-Mayer, Debra E. [3 ,4 ]
Ernst, Linda M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Ann & Robert H Lurie Childrens Hosp Chicago, Ctr Auton Med Pediat, Stanley Manne Childrens Res Inst, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
autopsy; perinatal pathology; placental pathology; stillbirth; REPRODUCIBILITY; NOSOLOGY; PARENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.049
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists places special emphasis on autopsy as one of the most important tests for evaluation of stillbirth. Despite a recommendation of an autopsy, many families will decline the autopsy based on religious/cultural beliefs, fear of additional suffering for the child, or belief that no additional information will be obtained or of value. Further, many obstetric providers express a myriad of barriers limiting their recommendation for a perinatal autopsy despite their understanding of its value. Consequently, perinatal autopsy rates have been declining. Without the information provided by an autopsy, many women are left with unanswered questions regarding cause of death for their fetus and without clear management strategies to reduce the risk of stillbirth in future pregnancies. To avoid this scenario, it is imperative that clinicians are knowledgeable about the benefit of autopsy so they can provide clear information on its diagnostic utility and decrease potential barriers; in so doing the obstetrician can ensure that each family has the necessary information to make an informed decision. OBJECTIVE: We sought to quantify the contribution of placental pathologic examination and autopsy in identifying a cause of stillbirth and to identify how often clinical management is modified due to each result. STUDY DESIGN: This is a cohort study of all cases of stillbirth from 2009 through 2013 at a single tertiary care center. Records were reviewed in a stepwise manner: first the clinical history and laboratory results, then the placental pathologic evaluation, and finally the autopsy. At each step, a cause of death and the certainty of that etiology were coded. Clinical changes that would be recommended by information available at each step were also recorded. RESULTS: Among the 144 cases of stillbirth examined, 104 (72%) underwent autopsy and these cases constitute the cohort of study. The clinical and laboratory information alone identified a cause of death in 35 (24%). After placental pathologic examination, 88 (61%) cases had a probable cause of death identified. The addition of autopsy resulted in 78 (74%) cases having an identifiable probable cause of death. Placental examination alone changed clinical management in 52 (36%) cases. Autopsy led to additional clinical management changes in 6 (6%) cases. CONCLUSION: This stepwise assessment of the benefit of both placental pathological examination and autopsy in changing probable cause of death beyond traditional clinical history and laboratory results emphasizes the need to implement more comprehensive evaluation of all stillbirths. With the aim of providing a cause of stillbirth to the parents, and to prevent future stillbirths, it behooves health care professionals to understand the value of this more comprehensive approach and convey that information to the bereaved parents.
引用
收藏
页码:115.e1 / 115.e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Autopsy for evaluating a stillbirth - Why are they not done?
    Fretts, Ruth C.
    Frederik Froen, J.
    Stray-Pedersen, B.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 107 (04): : 70S - 70S
  • [32] THE INTERET OF NEWBORN AUTOPSY IN CASE OF STILLBIRTH
    BERGER, C
    SOUTOUL, JH
    PIERRE, F
    MESNARD, L
    MORAINE, C
    [J]. JOURNAL DE MEDECINE LEGALE DROIT MEDICAL, 1990, 33 (05): : 317 - 323
  • [33] Validity of verbal autopsy for ascertaining the causes of stillbirth
    Aggarwal, Arun K.
    Jain, Vanita
    Kumar, Rajesh
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2011, 89 (01) : 31 - 40
  • [34] Thrombophilic risk factors for placental stillbirth
    Simchen, Michal J.
    Ofir, Keren
    Moran, Orit
    Kedem, Alon
    Sivan, Eyal
    Schiff, Eyal
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2010, 153 (02) : 160 - 164
  • [35] Decision influences and aftermath: parents, stillbirth and autopsy
    Horey, Dell
    Flenady, Vicki
    Conway, Liz
    McLeod, Emma
    Khong, Teck Yee
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2014, 17 (04) : 534 - 544
  • [36] Evaluation of the relation between placental weight and placental weight to foetal weight ratio and the causes of stillbirth: a retrospective comparative study
    Pasztor, Norbert
    Sikovanyecz, Janos
    Kereszturi, Attila
    Kozinszky, Zoltan
    Nemeth, Gabor
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 38 (01) : 74 - 80
  • [37] Placental pathology
    Fox, H
    [J]. INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RESTRICTION: AETIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2000, : 187 - 201
  • [38] PLACENTAL PATHOLOGY
    不详
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1993, 42 (03) : 318 - 319
  • [39] PLACENTAL PATHOLOGY
    不详
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1992, 39 (02) : 146 - 147
  • [40] FORENSIC PATHOLOGY AND THE AUTOPSY
    HIRSCH, CS
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 1984, 108 (06) : 484 - 489