Efficacy of adjunctive D-Cycloserine for the treatment of schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:5
|
作者
Kuppili, Pooja Patnaik [1 ]
Menon, Vikas [2 ]
Sathyanarayanan, Gopinath [3 ]
Sarkar, Siddharth [4 ,5 ]
Andrade, Chittaranjan [6 ]
机构
[1] Black Country Healthcare NHS Fdn Trust, Penn Hosp, Wolverhampton WV4 5HN, England
[2] Jawaharlal Inst Postgrad Med Educ & Res, Pondicherry, India
[3] Sree Balaji Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[4] All India Inst Med Sci AIIMS, Dept Psychiat, New Delhi, India
[5] All India Inst Med Sci AIIMS, Natl Drug Dependence & Treatment Ctr NDDTC, New Delhi, India
[6] Natl Inst Mental Hlth & Neurosci NIMHANS, Dept Clin Psychopharmacol & Neurotoxicol, Bengaluru, India
关键词
Meta-analysis; Schizophrenia; Glutamate; Glycine; D-serine; D-cycloserine; NMDA RECEPTOR HYPOFUNCTION; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS; CONVENTIONAL NEUROLEPTICS; ADJUVANT THERAPY; DOUBLE-BLIND; GLYCINE; NEUROTRANSMISSION; AUGMENTATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00702-020-02292-x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
d-Cycloserine is a partial agonist at the glycine site of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor. Results have been inconsistent in trials on the efficacy of d-Cycloserine in patients with schizophrenia. We examined the efficacy of d-Cycloserine against negative and cognitive symptoms (primary and co-primary outcomes). Secondary outcomes were efficacy of d-Cycloserine against positive symptoms and the examination of early treatment outcomes. A systematic literature search was carried out using following selection criteria: Population = Patients with Schizophrenia; Intervention = Trials using d-Cycloserine either as monotherapy or adjuvant therapy; Comparison = Placebo or active comparator; Outcome = Change in negative symptoms, cognitive symptoms and positive symptoms; Study design = Randomized controlled trials with parallel design. We used the Cochrane Collaboration tool for risk of bias for study quality appraisal. Effect sizes for trials were calculated separately for negative, positive and cognitive symptom dimensions using the DerSimonian-Laird random effects model. Seven studies (pooled N = 413) provided data for meta-analysis. The pooled Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) for negative, cognitive, and positive symptom change scores were - 0.32 (95% CI, - 0.75 to 0.11), - 0.05 (95% CI, - 0.91 to 0.81), and - 0.08 (95% CI, - 0.37 to 0.20), respectively. No significant improvement was noted with regard to early outcome. I-2 values for heterogeneity were 61%, 67%, and 0% for studies assessing negative, cognitive, and positive symptom ratings, respectively. d-Cycloserine did not exhibit significant efficacy in treating negative, cognitive, or positive symptoms of schizophrenia at either study-defined endpoint (4-36 weeks) or at four weeks (early outcome).
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 262
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Antiplaque Efficacy of Toothpaste - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Nachu, Sneha
    Ravoori, Srinivas
    Pachava, Srinivas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDIAN ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH DENTISTRY, 2022, 20 (01) : 16 - 24
  • [32] Efficacy of the Unified Protocol: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Longley, Susan L.
    Gleiser, Tali S.
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2023, 30 (02) : 208 - 221
  • [33] Efficacy and safety of aripiprazole augmentation of clozapine in schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials
    Srisurapanont, Manit
    Suttajit, Sirijit
    Maneeton, Narong
    Maneeton, Benchalak
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2015, 62 : 38 - 47
  • [34] Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety of Blonanserin in Schizophrenia: An Updated and Extended Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Kishi, Taro
    Matsui, Yuki
    Matsuda, Yuki
    Katsuki, Asuka
    Hori, Hikaru
    Yanagimoto, Hiroko
    Sanada, Kenji
    Morita, Kiichiro
    Yoshimura, Reiji
    Shoji, Yoshihisa
    Hagi, Katsuhiko
    Iwata, Nakao
    [J]. PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY, 2019, 52 (02) : 52 - 62
  • [35] Efficacy and tolerability of topiramate-augmentation therapy for schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Okuyama, Yuji
    Oya, Kazuto
    Matsunaga, Shinji
    Kishi, Taro
    Iwata, Nakao
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2016, 12 : 3221 - 3236
  • [36] Safety and Efficacy of Ondansetron and Simvastatin as Potential Adjunctive Treatment for Patients With Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Khan, Kokab Irfan
    Al Shouli, Roba
    Allakky, Akhil
    Ferguson, Asila A.
    Khan, Aujala Irfan
    Abuzainah, Baraa
    Gutlapalli, Sai Dheeraj
    Chaudhuri, Dipabali
    Hamid, Pousette
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [37] Acceptability of cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Vita, Antonio
    Barlati, Stefano
    Ceraso, Anna
    Deste, Giacomo
    Nibbio, Gabriele
    Wykes, Til
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 53 (08) : 3661 - 3671
  • [38] Comments on "Efficacy and safety of adjunctive corticosteroids in the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials"
    Luo, Ming-hao
    Wan, Zengyi
    Tu, Guo-wei
    Luo, Zhe
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2023, 27 (01)
  • [39] Comments on “Efficacy and safety of adjunctive corticosteroids in the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials”
    Ming-hao Luo
    Zengyi Wan
    Guo-wei Tu
    Zhe Luo
    [J]. Critical Care, 27
  • [40] Efficacy and safety of corticosteroid in the treatment of hand osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Xing Wang
    Peng Wang
    Andrew Faramand
    Xi Zha
    Yu Zhang
    Weelic Chong
    Yang Hai
    Fang Fang
    [J]. Clinical Rheumatology, 2022, 41 : 1825 - 1832