Effectiveness and safety of different traditional Chinese medicine therapies for allergic rhinitis A protocol for systematic review and network meta analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Yu, Ting [1 ]
Yan, ShiFan [1 ]
Chi, ZhenHai [2 ]
Cheng, Pan [1 ]
Li, HaiYan [1 ]
Qin, SiYu [1 ]
Li, MingHui [1 ]
Chen, RiXin [2 ]
Jiao, Lin [2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangxi Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Affiliated Hosp, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
allergic rhinitis; network meta-analysis; protocol; IMPACT; PREVALENCE; QUALITY; UPDATE; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000022521
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Traditional Chinese medicine has been widely used in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. However, currently randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analysis only compare 1 or 2 types of traditional Chinese medicine therapies, and the comprehensive ranking of efficacy and safety of multiple traditional Chinese medicine therapies for the treatment of allergic rhinitis has not been completed. Therefore, the purpose of this network meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different traditional Chinese medicine therapies for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Methods and analysis: Three English databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and 2 Chinese databases of CNKI and Wanfang were searched from their inceptions to September 1, 2020. At the same time, in order to prevent omissions, we also compared the previous meta-analysis to determine the final included trials. The main evaluation outcome was the total Clinical Score (total nasal symptom score [TNSS]), the secondary evaluation outcome was the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) and adverse events. The Cochrane Collaboration's Tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality of articles, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) instrument was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. Network meta-analysis was completed by using Stata Statistical Software (Version 14.0, Stata Corporation, College Station, TX). Results: This study will compare and rank the different traditional Chinese medicine therapies for allergic rhinitis. Conclusion: This study is the first time to use network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, which will provide ideas and methods for the clinical treatment for allergic rhinitis. INPLASY registration number: No. INPLASY202080119
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy and safety of modified Yupingfeng formula in treating allergic rhinitis A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis
    Liao, Chao
    Liu, Ting
    Zeng, Zhen
    Wang, Dandan
    Tang, Guangjun
    Wang, Huan
    Tian, Li
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (51) : E23698
  • [42] Efficacy and safety of Tian moxibustion in treating allergic rhinitis A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Deng, Gen
    Wan, Qun
    Wang, Jinlong
    Ye, Wenguo
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (51) : E23848
  • [43] Comparison of efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese patent medicine in the treatment of vitiligo in children or adults A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Yang, Meng
    Du, Mengmeng
    Tang, Zhikun
    Han, Guanqing
    Dong, Wenyao
    Chen, Zhaoyu
    Song, Yeqiang
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (11) : E24878
  • [44] Comparative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese patent medicine for anxiety disorders in children or adolescence A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Jiang, Zhenyuan
    Wang, Jiahao
    Yu, Xiaowen
    Li, Chuancheng
    Shao, Yuze
    Wang, Zhonglin
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (39) : E22274
  • [45] Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine injections in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Sun, Zhongli
    Zhao, Wei
    Yang, Kun
    Li, Xingying
    Yu, Penglong
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (38)
  • [46] Effectiveness comparisons of Chinese patent medicine on sciatica A protocol for systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
    An, Hongqiang
    Li, Bing
    Zhao, Jifeng
    Ao, Zhijian
    Zhong, Xiaohui
    Zhu, Pengfei
    Wu, Jianlin
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (51) : E23826
  • [47] Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese herbal medicine in the treatment of threatened abortion A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zeng, Pengfei
    Zhou, Hang
    Guo, Pei
    Xia, Wanting
    Huang, Jinzhu
    Zeng, Qian
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (05) : E23288
  • [48] Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine yangxin anshen therapy for insomnia A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Feizhou
    Wang, Xuanxuan
    Song, Ziyu
    Liu, Ling
    Zhang, Tong
    Chen, Yanhua
    Wang, Ping
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (37)
  • [49] The efficacy and safety of Chinese traditional medicine injections on patients with coronavirus disease 2019 A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis
    Li, Yulin
    Xu, Haonan
    Lang, Hui
    Li, Jing
    Bi, Lin
    Li, Yanqing
    Dong, Liang
    Zhang, Lin
    Liang, Xin
    Zhu, Hongqiu
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (31) : E21024
  • [50] Effectiveness and safety of probiotic therapy for pediatric allergic rhinitis management: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Xia
    Tan, Xiangsheng
    Zhou, Jiwei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 162