Effectiveness and safety of different traditional Chinese medicine therapies for allergic rhinitis A protocol for systematic review and network meta analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Yu, Ting [1 ]
Yan, ShiFan [1 ]
Chi, ZhenHai [2 ]
Cheng, Pan [1 ]
Li, HaiYan [1 ]
Qin, SiYu [1 ]
Li, MingHui [1 ]
Chen, RiXin [2 ]
Jiao, Lin [2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangxi Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Affiliated Hosp, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
allergic rhinitis; network meta-analysis; protocol; IMPACT; PREVALENCE; QUALITY; UPDATE; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000022521
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Traditional Chinese medicine has been widely used in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. However, currently randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analysis only compare 1 or 2 types of traditional Chinese medicine therapies, and the comprehensive ranking of efficacy and safety of multiple traditional Chinese medicine therapies for the treatment of allergic rhinitis has not been completed. Therefore, the purpose of this network meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different traditional Chinese medicine therapies for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Methods and analysis: Three English databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and 2 Chinese databases of CNKI and Wanfang were searched from their inceptions to September 1, 2020. At the same time, in order to prevent omissions, we also compared the previous meta-analysis to determine the final included trials. The main evaluation outcome was the total Clinical Score (total nasal symptom score [TNSS]), the secondary evaluation outcome was the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) and adverse events. The Cochrane Collaboration's Tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality of articles, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) instrument was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. Network meta-analysis was completed by using Stata Statistical Software (Version 14.0, Stata Corporation, College Station, TX). Results: This study will compare and rank the different traditional Chinese medicine therapies for allergic rhinitis. Conclusion: This study is the first time to use network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, which will provide ideas and methods for the clinical treatment for allergic rhinitis. INPLASY registration number: No. INPLASY202080119
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effectiveness and safety of 3 different traditional Chinese therapies for asthma in minors A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Yan, Shi Fan
    Yu, Ting
    Li, Fu Sheng
    Huang, Yong
    Wang, Mao Hong
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (47) : e23021
  • [2] Effectiveness and safety of different academic schools of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of obesity: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gang, Xiaochao
    Gao, Tianjiao
    Han, Yiran
    Tai, Yuxing
    Zhong, Chongwen
    Chen, Shaotao
    Gao, Ying
    Li, Lijie
    Xiao, Zhenxiang
    Barat, Dilnur
    Liu, Mingjun
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (49) : E31960
  • [3] Traditional Chinese medicine therapies for patients with knee osteoarthritis: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Wu, Boyu
    Yang, Lei
    Chen, Liying
    Ma, Lu
    Guo, Yantao
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (28) : E29404
  • [4] Different Chinese patent medicine therapies for migraine A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Hu, Liangen
    Yan, Zhangren
    Chen, Feng
    Xiao, Wei
    Liu, Liting
    Huang, Chunhua
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (02) : E24179
  • [5] Effectiveness and safety of different traditional Chinese medicines for Coronavirus disease 2019 A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Huang, Bo
    Liu, Yingfeng
    Pi, Chiheng
    Yan, Shifan
    Li, Fusheng
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (31) : E26676
  • [6] Effectiveness and safety of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of senile hypotension A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Zhijun
    Zhu, Siyuan
    Liu, Meihua
    Tang, Genhua
    Zhong, Zhiying
    Lu, LunBin
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (16) : E25385
  • [7] Comparative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for lipodermatosclerosis A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Du, Mengmeng
    Zhang, Yudong
    Shi, Xiaohua
    Liu, Ming
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (47) : E23386
  • [8] The effectiveness and safety of acupoint herbal patching for allergic rhinitis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xu, Ningcong
    Zhang, Claire Shuiqing
    Tan, Xi
    Lai, Yunjie
    Cen, Yanfang
    Zhou, Shiqing
    Xia, Jiyan
    Li, Yunying
    Luo, Qiulan
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [9] Effectiveness and safety of indirect moxibustion for the treatment of allergic rhinitis A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs
    Yuan, Ting
    Fu, Yong
    Xiong, Jun
    Zhang, Haifeng
    Yang, Jun
    Wang, Xue
    Fan, Hao
    Jiang, Yunfeng
    Zhou, Xiaohong
    Liao, Kai
    Xu, Lingling
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (28) : E20911
  • [10] Effectiveness and safety of adjunctive traditional Chinese medicine therapy for primary liver cancer patients A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis
    Li, Tingting
    Zhang, Xiaona
    Xu, Shanshan
    Cheng, Hongjie
    Zhang, Hong
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (31) : E21281