Modeling and quantification of available potassium spatial uncertainty in the soil by stochastic simulations

被引:3
|
作者
de Oliveira, Ismenia Ribeiro [1 ]
Teixeira, Daniel De Bortoli [2 ]
Panosso, Alan Rodrigo [3 ]
Marques Junior, Jose [2 ]
Pereira, Gener Tadeu [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Maranhao, Ctr Ciencias Agr & Ambientais, BR-65500000 Chapadinha, MA, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Paulista Unesp, Fac Ciencias Agr & Vet, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
[3] UNESP, Fac Engn Ilha Solteira, BR-15385000 Ilha Solteira, SP, Brazil
关键词
soil fertility; geostatistics; kriging; sequential Gaussian simulation; sequential indicator simulation; spatial variability; SEQUENTIAL INDICATOR SIMULATION; CO2; EMISSIONS; VARIABILITY; PATTERNS; GEOSTATISTICS; ATTRIBUTES; PHOSPHORUS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-204X2014000900007
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The objective of this work was to evaluate the performance of the sequential Gaussian simulation (SGS) and the sequential indicator simulation (SIS) for modeling the uncertainty of available K predictions in a sugarcane area, and to compare both simulations to the already established method of ordinary kriging (OK). A sampling grid with 626 points was installed in an area of 200 ha, in the municipality of Tabapua, in the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil. The simulations reproduced the variability in the available K sample data, whereas OK overestimated the low K levels and underestimated the high ones. The standard deviation map obtained from OK showed less variation along the studied area when compared to the maps obtained from the simulations. SIS achieved an accuracy 22% higher than that obtained by SGS for modeling the conditional distribution function of K. The simulations have higher efficiency than OK for modeling the uncertainty in the spatial distribution of K. SIS has better performance than SGS for estimating the levels of available K in sugarcane area.
引用
收藏
页码:708 / 718
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stochastic approaches to uncertainty quantification in CFD simulations
    Mathelin, L
    Hussaini, MY
    Zang, TA
    NUMERICAL ALGORITHMS, 2005, 38 (1-3) : 209 - 236
  • [2] Stochastic approaches to uncertainty quantification in CFD simulations
    Lionel Mathelin
    M. Yousuff Hussaini
    Thomas A. Zang
    Numerical Algorithms, 2005, 38 : 209 - 236
  • [3] GEOSTATISTICAL MODELING OF UNCERTAINTY OF THE SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF AVAILABLE PHOSPHORUS IN SOIL IN A SUGARCANE FIELD
    de Oliveira, Ismenia Ribeiro
    Teixeira, Daniel De Bortoli
    Panosso, Alan Rodrigo
    Camargo, Livia Arantes
    Marques Junior, Jose
    Pereira, Gener Tadeu
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO, 2013, 37 (06): : 1481 - 1491
  • [4] Uncertainty quantification in CFD simulations: A stochastic spectral approach
    Mathelin, L
    Hussaini, MY
    COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS 2002, 2003, : 65 - 70
  • [5] Stochastic simulations of ocean waves: An uncertainty quantification study
    Yildirim, B.
    Karniadakis, George Em
    OCEAN MODELLING, 2015, 86 : 15 - 35
  • [6] SPECIAL ISSUE ON UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION AND STOCHASTIC MODELING
    Beck, Andre T.
    Trindade, Marcelo A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2013, 3 (06) : VII - VIII
  • [7] A Stochastic Collocation Method for Uncertainty Quantification and Propagation in Cardiovascular Simulations
    Sankaran, Sethuraman
    Marsden, Alison L.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2011, 133 (03):
  • [8] Assessing the spatial uncertainty in soil nitrogen mapping through stochastic simulations with categorical land use information
    Qu, Mingkai
    Li, Weidong
    Zhang, Chuanrong
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2013, 16 : 1 - 9
  • [9] Quantification and assessment of fault uncertainty and risk using stochastic conditional simulations
    Roussos Dimitrakopoulos
    International Journal of Coal Science & Technology, 2002, (02) : 1 - 11
  • [10] On the modeling of soil fertility by stochastic simulation with uncertainty treatments
    Ortiz, JDO
    Felgueiras, CA
    Druck, S
    Monteiro, AMV
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2004, 39 (04) : 379 - 389