Machine learning assisted relative permeability upscaling for uncertainty quantification

被引:14
|
作者
Wang, Yanji [1 ,2 ]
Li, Hangyu [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Jianchun [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Shuyang [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Xiaopu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr East China, Minist Educ, Key Lab Unconvent Oil & Gas Dev, Qingdao 266580, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Petr East China, Sch Petr Engn, Qingdao 266580, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Reservoir simulation; Two-phase upscaling; Machine learning; Relative permeability; Uncertainty quantification; FLUX BOUNDARY-CONDITIONS; FLOW; SIMULATION; TRANSPORT; ENSEMBLE; MODELS; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2022.123284
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Traditional two-phase relative permeability upscaling entails the computation of upscaled relative permeability functions for each coarse block (or interface). The procedure can be extremely timeconsuming especially for cases with multiple (hundreds of) geological realizations as commonly used in subsurface uncertainty quantification or optimization. In this paper, we develop a machine learning assisted relative permeability upscaling method, in which the flow-based two-phase upscaling is performed for only a small portion of the coarse blocks (or interfaces), while the upscaled relative permeability functions for the rest of the coarse blocks (or interfaces) are quickly computed by machine learning algorithms. The upscaling procedure was tested for generic (left to right) flow problems using 2D models for scenarios involving multiple realizations. Both Gaussian and channelized models with standard boundary conditions and effective flux boundary conditions (EFBCs) are considered. Numerical results have shown that the coarse-scale simulation results using the newly developed machine learning assisted upscaling are of similar accuracy to the coarse results using full numerical upscaling at both ensemble and realization-by-realization levels. Because the full flow-based upscaling is only performed for a small fraction of the models, significant speedups are achieved.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Machine Learning for Aerodynamic Uncertainty Quantification
    Liu, Dishi
    Maruyama, Daigo
    Goert, Stefan
    [J]. ERCIM NEWS, 2020, (122): : 20 - 21
  • [2] Machine Learning for the Uncertainty Quantification of Power Networks
    Memon, Zain A.
    Trinchero, Riccardo
    Manfredi, Paolo
    Canavero, Flavio
    Stievano, Igor S.
    Xie, Yanzhao
    [J]. IEEE LETTERS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY PRACTICE AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 2 (04): : 138 - 141
  • [3] Uncertain Context: Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning
    Jalaian, Brian
    Lee, Michael
    Russell, Stephen
    [J]. AI MAGAZINE, 2019, 40 (04) : 40 - 48
  • [4] Upscaling of Relative Permeability Using Pseudo Functions
    Hashemi, A.
    Shadizadeh, S. R.
    Zargar, G.
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2014, 36 (20) : 2227 - 2237
  • [5] Uncertainty quantification of bistable variable stiffness laminate using machine learning assisted perturbation approach
    Suraj, K. S.
    Anilkumar, P. M.
    Krishnanunni, C. G.
    Rao, B. N.
    [J]. COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2023, 319
  • [6] Physics-informed machine learning assisted uncertainty quantification for the corrosion of dissimilar material joints
    Bansal, Parth
    Zheng, Zhuoyuan
    Shao, Chenhui
    Li, Jingjing
    Banu, Mihaela
    Carlson, Blair E.
    Li, Yumeng
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 227
  • [7] Machine learning the deuteron: new architectures and uncertainty quantification
    Sarmiento, J. Rozalen
    Keeble, J. W. T.
    Rios, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS, 2024, 139 (02):
  • [8] Machine Learning in Measurement Part 2: Uncertainty Quantification
    Al Osman, Hussein
    Shirmohammadi, Shervin
    [J]. IEEE INSTRUMENTATION & MEASUREMENT MAGAZINE, 2021, 24 (03) : 23 - 27
  • [9] Evaluation of machine learning techniques for forecast uncertainty quantification
    Sacco, Maximiliano A.
    Ruiz, Juan J.
    Pulido, Manuel
    Tandeo, Pierre
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2022, 148 (749) : 3470 - 3490
  • [10] Uncertainty quantification of machine learning models: on conformal prediction
    Akpabio, Inimfon I.
    Savari, Serap A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MICRO-NANOPATTERNING MATERIALS AND METROLOGY-JM3, 2021, 20 (04):