Dentoskeletal and Soft Tissue Effects of Mini-implants in Class II division 1 Patients

被引:27
|
作者
Ulpadhyay, Madhur [1 ]
Yadav, Sumit [2 ]
Nagaraj, K. [1 ]
Nanda, Ravindra [3 ]
机构
[1] KLES Inst Dent Sci, Dept Orthodont, Belgaum, Karnataka, India
[2] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ, Indiana Sch Dent, Dept Oral Biol, Sect Orthodont, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[3] Univ Connecticut, Dept Craniofacial Sci, Div Orthodont, Ctr Hlth, Farmington, CT 06030 USA
关键词
Class II; Maximum anchorage; Mini-implants; CANINE-RETRACTION; PREMOLAR EXTRACTION; CLINICAL-EVALUATION; SLIDING MECHANICS; ANCHORAGE; THERAPY;
D O I
10.2319/013008-52.1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue treatment effects of retraction of maxillary anterior teeth with mini-implant anchorage in nongrowing Class II division 1 female patients. Materials and Methods: Twenty-three patients (overjet >= 7 mm) were selected on the basis of predefined selection criteria. Treatment mechanics consisted of retraction of anterior teeth by placing mini-implants in the interdental bone between the roots of the maxillary first molar and second premolar. A force of 150 g was applied, bilaterally. Treatment effects were analyzed by taking lateral cephalograms and study casts at T1 (before initiation of retraction) and at T2 (after complete space closure). Results: The upper anterior teeth showed significant retraction (5.18 +/- 2.74 mm) and intrusion (1.32 +/- 1.08 mm). The upper first molar also showed some distal movement and intrusion, but this was not significant (P > .05). The upper and lower lips were retracted by 2.41 mm and 2.73 mm, respectively, and the convexity angle reduced by over 2 degrees (P < .001). Conclusion: Mini-implants provided absolute anchorage to bring about significant dental and soft tissue changes in moderate to severe Class II division 1 patients and can be considered as possible alternatives to orthognathic surgery in select-cases. (Angle Orthod. 2009:79;)
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 247
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Expectations, acceptance and preferences of patients in treatment with orthodontic mini-implants Part II: Implant removal
    Lehnen, Sandra
    McDonald, Fraser
    Bourauel, Christoph
    Jaeger, Andreas
    Baxmann, Martin
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-FORTSCHRITTE DER KIEFERORTHOPADIE, 2011, 72 (03): : 214 - 222
  • [32] Consecutive use of mini-implants in the palate to treat skeletal maxillary constriction and Class II malocclusion in an adult case
    Kayalar, E.
    Batu-Guney, A.
    Marsan, G.
    Firatli, S.
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 23 (11) : 1624 - 1627
  • [33] Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial
    Al-Sibaie, Salma
    Hajeer, Mohammad Y.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2014, 36 (03) : 275 - 283
  • [34] Retrieval analysis of immediately loaded orthodontic mini-implants: material and tissue characterization
    Vasoglou, Michail
    Chrysomali, Evanthia
    Zinelis, Spiros
    Bitsanis, Ilias
    Haralambakis, Nikos
    Makou, Margarita
    Liades, George
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2014, 36 (06) : 683 - 689
  • [35] A systematic review of methods for tissue analysis in animal studies on orthodontic mini-implants
    Gritsch, K.
    Laroche, N.
    Morgon, L.
    Al-Hity, R.
    Vico, L.
    Colon, P.
    Grosgogeat, B.
    ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2012, 15 (03) : 135 - 147
  • [36] Mini-implants in the palatal slope - a retrospective analysis of implant survival and tissue reaction
    Ziebura, Thomas
    Flieger, Stefanie
    Wiechmann, Dirk
    HEAD & FACE MEDICINE, 2012, 8
  • [37] Mini-implants in the palatal slope – a retrospective analysis of implant survival and tissue reaction
    Thomas Ziebura
    Stefanie Flieger
    Dirk Wiechmann
    Head & Face Medicine, 8
  • [38] Factors influencing soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic treatment in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion
    Maetevorakul, Suhatcha
    Viteporn, Smorntree
    PROGRESS IN ORTHODONTICS, 2016, 17
  • [39] Factors influencing soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic treatment in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion
    Suhatcha Maetevorakul
    Smorntree Viteporn
    Progress in Orthodontics, 17
  • [40] An interdisciplinary approach to orthodontic treatment of a mutilated Class III malocclusion with mini-implants, dental implants, and an autotransplant
    Liaw, Johnny Joung-Lin
    Park, Jae Hyun
    Chang, Chia-Chuan
    Wang, Shin-Huei
    Tsai, Betty Meng-Yun
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2022, 34 (01) : 281 - 296