THEMIS satellite observations of hot flow anomalies at Earth's bow shock

被引:35
|
作者
Chu, Christina [1 ]
Zhang, Hui [1 ]
Sibeck, David [2 ]
Otto, Antonius [1 ]
Zong, QiuGang [3 ]
Omidi, Nick [4 ]
McFadden, James P. [5 ]
Fruehauff, Dennis [6 ]
Angelopoulos, Vassilis [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Inst Geophys, 903 Koyukuk Dr, Fairbanks, AK 99775 USA
[2] NASA, Goddard Spaceflight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD USA
[3] Peking Univ, Inst Space Phys & Appl Technol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Solana Sci, San Diego, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif Berkeley, Space Sci Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[6] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Inst Geophys & Extraterr Phys, Braunschweig, Germany
[7] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Earth Planetary & Space Sci, Los Angeles, CA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Interplanetary physics (planetary bow shocks solar wind plasma); magnetospheric physics (solar wind-magnetosphere interactions); DIAMAGNETIC CAVITIES; CLUSTER OBSERVATIONS; UPSTREAM;
D O I
10.5194/angeo-35-443-2017
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Hot flow anomalies (HFAs) at Earth's bow shock were identified in Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions During Substorms (THEMIS) satellite data from 2007 to 2009. The events were classified as young or mature and also as regular or spontaneous hot flow anomalies (SHFAs). The dataset has 17 young SHFAs, 49 mature SHFAs, 15 young HFAs, and 55 mature HFAs. They span a wide range of magnetic local times (MLTs) from approximately 7 to 16.5MLT. The largest ratio of solar wind to HFA core density occurred near dusk and at larger distances from the bow shock. In this study, HFAs and SHFAs were observed up to 6.3 R-E and 6.1 R-E (Earth radii), respectively, upstream from the model bow shock. HFA-SHFA occurrence decreases with distance upstream from the bow shock. HFAs of the highest event core ion temperatures were not seen at the flanks. The ratio of HFA ion temperature increase to HFA electron temperature increase is highest around 12MLT and slightly duskward. For SHFAs, (T-ihfa /T-isw)/(T-ehfa/T-esw) generally increased with distance from the bow shock. Both mature and young HFAs are more prevalent when there is an approximately radial interplanetary magnetic field. HFAs occur most preferentially for solar wind speeds from 550 to 600 km s(-1). The correlation coefficient between the HFA increase in thermal energy density from solar wind values and the decrease in kinetic energy density from solar wind values is 0.62. SHFAs and HFAs do not show major differences in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 451
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A model of the Earth's distant bow shock
    Bennett, L
    Kivelson, MG
    Khurana, KK
    Frank, LA
    Paterson, WR
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1997, 102 (A12): : 26927 - 26941
  • [32] THEMIS observations of extreme magnetopause motion caused by a hot flow anomaly
    Jacobsen, K. S.
    Phan, T. D.
    Eastwood, J. P.
    Sibeck, D. G.
    Moen, J. I.
    Angelopoulos, V.
    McFadden, J. P.
    Engebretson, M. J.
    Provan, G.
    Larson, D.
    Fornacon, K. -H.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2009, 114
  • [33] Collision of a solar wind shock wave with the Earth's bow shock. Wave flow pattern
    Pushkar, E. A.
    Korolev, A. S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE STEKLOV INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS, 2013, 281 (01) : 189 - 203
  • [34] Collision of a solar wind shock wave with the Earth’s bow shock. Wave flow pattern
    E. A. Pushkar
    A. S. Korolev
    Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics, 2013, 281 : 189 - 203
  • [35] COSTEP/SOHO observations of energetic electrons far upstream of the Earth's bow-shock
    Klassen, A.
    Gomez-Herrero, R.
    Boehm, E.
    Mueller-Mellin, R.
    Heber, B.
    Wimmer-Schweingruber, R.
    ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE, 2008, 26 (04) : 905 - 912
  • [36] Magnetic pumping model for energizing superthermal particles applied to observations of the Earth's bow shock
    E. Lichko
    J. Egedal
    Nature Communications, 11
  • [37] Magnetic pumping model for energizing superthermal particles applied to observations of the Earth's bow shock
    Lichko, E.
    Egedal, J.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [38] First observations of foreshock bubbles upstream of Earth's bow shock: Characteristics and comparisons to HFAs
    Turner, D. L.
    Omidi, N.
    Sibeck, D. G.
    Angelopoulos, V.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2013, 118 (04) : 1552 - 1570
  • [39] On nonstationarity and rippling of the quasiperpendicular zone of the Earth bow shock: Cluster observations
    Lobzin, V. V.
    Krasnoselskikh, V. V.
    Musatenko, K.
    de Wit, T. Dudok
    ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE, 2008, 26 (09) : 2899 - 2910
  • [40] Slow electron holes in the Earth's bow shock
    Kamaletdinov, S. R.
    Vasko, I. Y.
    Wang, R.
    Artemyev, A. V.
    Yushkov, E. V.
    Mozer, F. S.
    PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2022, 29 (09)