Structural Variations in Protein Superfamilies: Actin and Tubulin

被引:7
|
作者
Wade, Richard H. [1 ]
Garcia-Saez, Isabel [1 ]
Kozielski, Frank [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Biol Struct, F-38027 Grenoble 1, France
[2] Beatson Inst Canc Res, Glasgow G61 1BD, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Structure variation in protein families; Actin; Tubulin; ALPHA-BETA-TUBULIN; CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE; GAMMA-TUBULIN; CELL-DIVISION; ARP2/3; COMPLEX; FAMILY; FTSZ; IDENTIFICATION; SEQUENCES; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1007/s12033-008-9128-6
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Structures of homologous proteins are usually conserved during evolution, as are critical active site residues. This is the case for actin and tubulin, the two most important cytoskeleton proteins in eukaryotes. Actins and their related proteins (Arps) constitute a large superfamily whereas the tubulin family has fewer members. Unaligned sequences of these two protein families were analysed by searching for short groups of family-specific amino acid residues, that we call motifs, and by counting the number of residues from one motif to the next. For each sequence, the set of motif-to-motif residue counts forms a subfamily-specific pattern (landmark pattern) allowing actin and tubulin superfamily members to be identified and sorted into subfamilies. The differences between patterns of individual subfamilies are due to inserts and deletions (indels). Inserts appear to have arisen at an early stage in eukaryote evolution as suggested by the small but consistent kingdom-dependent differences found within many Arp subfamilies and in gamma-tubulins. Inserts tend to be in surface loops where they can influence subfamily-specific function without disturbing the core structure of the protein. The relatively few indels found for tubulins have similar positions to established results, whereas we find many previously unreported indel positions and lengths for the metazoan Arps.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 60
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] COMPARISON OF TUBULIN AND ACTIN
    MOHRI, H
    SHIMOMURA, M
    JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 1973, 74 (02): : 209 - 220
  • [22] Structural updates of alignment of protein domains and consequences on evolutionary models of domain superfamilies
    Mutt, Eshita
    Rani, Sudha Sane
    Sowdhamini, Ramanathan
    BIODATA MINING, 2013, 6
  • [23] PASS2: an automated database of protein alignments organised as structural superfamilies
    Bhaduri, A
    Pugalenthi, G
    Sowdhamini, R
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2004, 5 (1)
  • [24] GeMMA: functional subfamily classification within superfamilies of predicted protein structural domains
    Lee, David A.
    Rentzsch, Robert
    Orengo, Christine
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2010, 38 (03) : 720 - 737
  • [25] PASS2: an automated database of protein alignments organised as structural superfamilies
    Anirban Bhaduri
    Ganesan Pugalenthi
    Ramanathan Sowdhamini
    BMC Bioinformatics, 5
  • [26] Diversity in protein domain superfamilies
    Das, Sayoni
    Dawson, Natalie L.
    Orengo, Christine A.
    CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 35 : 40 - 49
  • [27] Physical origins of protein superfamilies
    Zeldovich, KB
    Berezovsky, IN
    Shakhnovich, EI
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2006, 357 (04) : 1335 - 1343
  • [28] fastSCOP: a fast web server for recognizing protein structural domains and SCOP superfamilies
    Tung, Chi-Hua
    Yang, Jinn-Moon
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2007, 35 : W438 - W443
  • [29] PROTEIN SUPERFAMILIES AND DOMAIN SUPERFOLDS
    ORENGO, CA
    JONES, DT
    THORNTON, JM
    NATURE, 1994, 372 (6507) : 631 - 634
  • [30] Structural updates of alignment of protein domains and consequences on evolutionary models of domain superfamilies
    Eshita Mutt
    Sudha Sane Rani
    Ramanathan Sowdhamini
    BioData Mining, 6