A survey of e-book interlibrary loan policy in US academic libraries

被引:5
|
作者
Zhu, Xiaohua [1 ]
Shen, Lan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Sch Informat Sci, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[2] Purdue Univ Calumet, Hammond, IN USA
来源
INTERLENDING & DOCUMENT SUPPLY | 2014年 / 42卷 / 2-3期
关键词
Academic libraries; Interlending; Electronic books; Electronic journals; Interlibrary loans; Interlibrary lending; MODEL;
D O I
10.1108/ILDS-05-2014-0025
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Purpose - This paper aims to reveal the perceived barriers to e-book interlibrary loan (ILL) and their reflections on academic libraries' ILL/lending policies. Academic libraries in the USA have witnessed an impressive growth in acquiring e-journals and e-books. Although ILL of e-journal articles has become a standard practice, ILL of copyrighted e-books does not appear to be equally common. E-book ILL is often considered difficult or nearly impossible because restrictions for ILL are embedded in license agreements (or terms of use) and reinforced by technological measures. Design/methodology/approach - The study opted for a telephone survey method, in which researchers collected data on ILL/lending policies about e-journals and e-books in 200 randomly selected academic libraries in the USA. Findings - The findings show the state of e-books in US academic libraries and demonstrate the slow adoption of e-book ILL compared to e-journal ILL. Licensing restrictions and lack of technical means are the major obstacles perceived by librarians, but there may also be a barrier of perception. Research limitations/implications - The survey data do not necessarily provide explanations. In-depth interviews may be needed to explain the barriers and perceptions. Practical implications - This paper reveals important perceptions and facts about e-book ILL in academic libraries and analyzes the obstacles and restrictions on e-book. Originality/value - This paper provides empirical data on the status of e-book ILL.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 63
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of the e-Book on Total Circulation Transactions-A Case Study for Hong Kong Academic Libraries
    Ching, Steve H.
    Hsiao, Michael
    LIBRARY COLLECTIONS ACQUISITIONS & TECHNICAL SERVICES, 2015, 39 (1-2): : 1 - 8
  • [32] Interlibrary loan in US and Canadian health sciences libraries 2005: update on journal article use
    Lacroix, Eve-Marie
    Collins, Maria Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 2007, 95 (02) : 189 - 194
  • [33] A survey of E-book digital right management
    Tsai, Cheng-Yi
    Yang, Cheng-Ying
    Lin, Iuon-Chang
    Hwang, Min-Shiang
    International Journal of Network Security, 2018, 20 (05) : 998 - 1004
  • [34] E-book usage and the Choice outstanding academic book list:: Is there a correlation?
    Williams, Karen Carter
    Best, Rickey
    JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP, 2006, 32 (05): : 474 - 478
  • [35] E-book and print book price and desirability for university libraries: a comparative study
    Rao, K. N.
    Kumar, Sunil
    Tripathi, Manorama
    ELECTRONIC LIBRARY, 2018, 36 (01): : 82 - 102
  • [36] E-book reading groups: interacting with e-books in public libraries
    Landoni, Monica
    Hanlon, Gillian
    ELECTRONIC LIBRARY, 2007, 25 (05): : 599 - 612
  • [37] Patron-focused services in three US libraries:: collaborative interlibrary loan, collection development and acquisitions
    Allen, M
    Ward, SM
    Wray, T
    Debus-López, KE
    INTERLENDING & DOCUMENT SUPPLY, 2003, 31 (02): : 138 - 141
  • [38] UK scholarly e-book usage:: a landmark survey
    Nicholas, David
    Rowlands, Ian
    Clark, David
    Huntington, Paul
    Jamali, Hamid R.
    Olle, Candela
    ASLIB PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 60 (04): : 311 - 334
  • [39] Academic E-book Usability from the Student's Perspective
    Tovstiadi, Esta
    Tingle, Natalia
    Wiersma, Gabrielle
    EVIDENCE BASED LIBRARY AND INFORMATION PRACTICE, 2018, 13 (04): : 70 - 87
  • [40] E-book usage amongst academic librarians in South Africa
    Zinn, Sandy
    Langdown, Natasha
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF LIBRARIES AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2011, 77 (02) : 104 - 115