Validating a dimension of doubt in decision-making: A proposed endophenotype for obsessive-compulsive disorder

被引:19
|
作者
Marton, Tanya [1 ]
Samuels, Jack [2 ]
Nestadt, Paul [2 ]
Krasnow, Janice [2 ]
Wang, Ying [2 ]
Shuler, Marshall [1 ]
Kamath, Vidyulata [2 ]
Chib, Vikram S. [3 ,4 ]
Bakker, Arnold [2 ]
Nestadt, Gerald [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurosci, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biomed Engn, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[4] Kennedy Krieger Inst, Baltimore, MD USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2019年 / 14卷 / 06期
关键词
VISUAL-MOTION; CONFIDENCE; UNCERTAINTY; TENDENCIES; PERCEPTION; FEEDBACK; RELIANCE; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0218182
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Doubt is subjective uncertainty about one's perceptions and recall. It can impair decision-making and is a prominent feature of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). We propose that evaluation of doubt during decision-making provides a useful endophenotype with which to study the underlying pathophysiology of OCD and potentially other psychopathologies. For the current study, we developed a new instrument, the Doubt Questionnaire, to clinically assess doubt. The random dot motion task was used to measure reaction time and subjective certainty, at varying levels of perceptual difficulty, in individuals who scored high and low on doubt, and in individuals with and without OCD. We found that doubt scores were significantly higher in OCD cases than controls. Drift diffusion modeling revealed that high doubt scores predicted slower evidence accumulation than did low doubt scores; and OCD diagnosis lower than controls. At higher levels of dot coherence, OCD participants exhibited significantly slower drift rates than did controls (q<0.05 for 30%, and 45% coherence; q<0.01 for 70% coherence). In addition, at higher levels of coherence, high doubt subjects exhibited even slower drift rates and reaction times than low doubt subjects (q<0.01 for 70% coherence). Moreover, under high coherence conditions, individuals with high doubt scores reported lower certainty in their decisions than did those with low doubt scores. We conclude that the Doubt Questionnaire is a useful instrument for measuring doubt. Compared to those with low doubt, those with high doubt accumulate evidence more slowly and report lower certainty when making decisions under conditions of low uncertainty. High doubt may affect the decision-making process in individuals with OCD. The dimensional doubt measure is a useful endophenotype for OCD research and could enable computationally rigorous and neurally valid understanding of decision-making and its pathological expression in OCD and other disorders.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Abnormal Anhedonia as a Potential Endophenotype in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
    Xu, Chuanyong
    Chen, Jierong
    Cui, Zitian
    Wen, Rongzhen
    Han, Hongying
    Jin, Lili
    Wan, Guobin
    Wei, Zhen
    Peng, Ziwen
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2020, 16 : 3001 - 3010
  • [22] ACTION MONITORING DYSFUNCTIONS AS AN ENDOPHENOTYPE IN OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER
    Riesel, Anja
    Endrass, Tanja
    Kaufmann, Christian
    Kathmann, Norbert
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 46 : S78 - S78
  • [23] Further evidence of a dissociation between decision-making under ambiguity and decision-making under risk in obsessive-compulsive disorder
    Kim, Hae Won
    Kang, Jee In
    Namkoong, Kee
    Jhung, Kyungun
    Ha, Ra Yeon
    Kim, Se Joo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2015, 176 : 118 - 124
  • [24] Probing Frontal Circuitry During Performance Monitoring and Decision-Making in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
    Stern, Emily R.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 67 (09) : 105S - 105S
  • [25] Think twice: Impulsivity and decision making in obsessive-compulsive disorder
    Grassi, Giacomo
    Pallanti, Stefano
    Righi, Lorenzo
    Figee, Martijn
    Mantione, Mariska
    Denys, Damiaan
    Piccagliani, Daniele
    Rossi, Alessandro
    Stratta, Paolo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL ADDICTIONS, 2015, 4 (04) : 263 - 272
  • [26] Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Uncertainty: Struggling with a Shadow of a Doubt
    Rizzolo, Gregory
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PSYCHOANALYTIC ASSOCIATION, 2023, 71 (04) : 744 - 750
  • [27] Doubt in the insula: risk processing in obsessive-compulsive disorder
    Luigjes, J.
    Figee, M.
    Tobler, P. N.
    Van den Brink, W.
    De Kwaasteniet, B.
    Van Wingen, G.
    Denys, D.
    [J]. EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 24 : S588 - S589
  • [28] Doubt in the Insula: Risk Processing in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
    Luigjes, Judy
    Figee, Martijn
    Tobler, Philippe N.
    van den Brink, Wim
    de Kwaasteniet, Bart
    van Wingen, Guido
    Denys, Damiaan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10
  • [29] Subcortical and cortical morphological anomalies as an endophenotype in obsessive-compulsive disorder
    P Shaw
    W Sharp
    G Sudre
    A Wharton
    D Greenstein
    A Raznahan
    A Evans
    M M Chakravarty
    J P Lerch
    J Rapoport
    [J]. Molecular Psychiatry, 2015, 20 : 224 - 231
  • [30] Shared and Disorder-Specific Neurocomputational Mechanisms of Decision-Making in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
    Carlisi, Christina O.
    Norman, Luke
    Murphy, Clodagh M.
    Christakou, Anastasia
    Chantiluke, Kaylita
    Giampietro, Vincent
    Simmons, Andrew
    Brammer, Michael
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Mataix-Cols, David
    Rubia, Katya
    [J]. CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2017, 27 (12) : 5804 - 5816