Efficacy of bispectral monitoring as an adjunct to nurse-administered propofol sedation for colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial

被引:67
|
作者
Drake, Luke M. [1 ]
Chen, Shawn C. [1 ]
Rex, Douglas K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Indianapolis, IN USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2006年 / 101卷 / 09期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00806.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Bispectral (BIS) monitoring provides an objective, non-invasive measure of the level of consciousness in sedated patients. BIS has been shown to lag behind the level of sedation during induction and emergence of sedation with propofol. In this study, we sought to determine whether BIS is a useful adjunctive maneuver to registered nurse-administered propofol sedation (NAPS) as measured by reductions in recovery time and doses of propofol administered. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial of 102 outpatients presenting for colonoscopy was performed. BIS values were recorded continuously in all subjects. Patients were randomized to receive NAPS with BIS visible to nurse and endoscopist versus BIS invisible to nurse and endoscopist. In phase 1 (47 patients), the nurse and endoscopist team were instructed to consider BIS (when visible) as only adjunctive information with regard to titrating sedation. In phase 2 (55 patients), the nurse endoscopist team was instructed to use BIS as the primary endpoint for titration of sedation, and to target BIS to greater than 60 (60-70 is deep sedation). RESULTS: In phase 1, the mean (SD) BIS value from scope-in (SI) to scope-out (SO) for BIS was 59.3 (9.9) and was not different from controls at 59.9 (10.1; p = 0.82). The mean (SD) propofol dose (mg/min) was 15.8 (5.6) and 17.2 (6.2) for BIS and controls, respectively (p = 0.45). The mean (SD) recovery time with BIS visible in phase 1 was 20.6 min (5.5) versus 19.2 min (4.5) in controls (p = 0.34). In phase 2, the mean (SD) BIS from SI to SO in those randomized to have BIS visible was 64.1 (5.4) versus 63.1 (8.5) in controls (p = 0.58). The mean (SD) dose of propofol (mg/min) was 16.1 (11.2) and 16.4 (12.3) for BIS and control groups, respectively (p = 0.92). The mean (SD) recovery time in phase 2 with BIS visible was 18.7 (3.5) versus 20.1 (5.6) in controls (p = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS: BIS did not lead to reductions in mean propofol dose or recovery time when used as an adjunct to NAPS for colonoscopy, or when used as the primary target for sedation. No clinically important role for BIS monitoring as an adjunct to NAPS has yet been established.
引用
收藏
页码:2003 / 2007
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Review article: registered nurse-administered propofol sedation for endoscopy
    Chen, SC
    Rex, DK
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2004, 19 (02) : 147 - 155
  • [32] High efficacy with deep nurse-administered propofol sedation for advanced gastroenterologic endoscopic procedures
    Jensen, Jeppe Thue
    Hornslet, Pernille
    Konge, Lars
    Moller, Ann Merete
    Vilmann, Peter
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2016, 4 (01) : E107 - E111
  • [33] Nonanesthesiologist-Administered Propofol Versus Midazolam and Propofol, Titrated to Moderate Sedation, for Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Molina-Infante, Javier
    Duenas-Sadornil, Carmen
    Mateos-Rodriguez, Jose M.
    Perez-Gallardo, Belen
    Vinagre-Rodriguez, Gema
    Hernandez-Alonso, Moises
    Fernandez-Bermejo, Miguel
    Gonzalez-Huix, Ferran
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2012, 57 (09) : 2385 - 2393
  • [34] Nonanesthesiologist-Administered Propofol Versus Midazolam and Propofol, Titrated to Moderate Sedation, for Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Javier Molina-Infante
    Carmen Dueñas-Sadornil
    Jose M. Mateos-Rodriguez
    Belen Perez-Gallardo
    Gema Vinagre-Rodríguez
    Moises Hernandez-Alonso
    Miguel Fernandez-Bermejo
    Ferran Gonzalez-Huix
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2012, 57 : 2385 - 2393
  • [35] Efficacy and Safety of Nurse-Administered Propofol Sedation During Emergency Upper Endoscopy for Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Prospective, Controlled Study
    Tohda, Gen
    Higashi, Seiju
    Sakumoto, Hitoshi
    Sumiyoshi, Ken-Ichi
    Kane, Teruyuki
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (05) : AB192 - AB192
  • [36] Nurse-administered propofol-alfentanil sedation using a patient-controlled analgesia pump compared with opioid-benzodiazepine sedation for outpatient colonoscopy
    Liu, S. Y. W.
    Poon, C. M.
    Leung, T. L.
    Wong, C. W.
    Chan, Y. L.
    Leung, T. C.
    Leong, H. T.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 41 (06) : 522 - 528
  • [37] Nurse-Administered Propofol Continuous Infusion Sedation: A New Paradigm for Gastrointestinal Procedural Sedation
    Lin, Otto S.
    La Selva, Danielle
    Kozarek, Richard A.
    Weigel, Wade
    Beecher, Ryan
    Gluck, Michael
    Chiorean, Michael
    Boden, Elisa
    Venu, Nanda
    Krishnamoorthi, Rajesh
    Larsen, Michael
    Ross, Andrew
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 116 (04): : 710 - 716
  • [38] Safety of nurse-administered propofol sedation using PCA pump for outpatient colonoscopy in Chinese patients: A pilot study
    Poon, Chi-Ming
    Leung, Tak-Lun
    Wong, Chui-Wah
    Chan, Yuk-Ling
    Leung, Tin-Chun
    Leong, Heng-Tat
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 30 (04) : 239 - 243
  • [39] Nurse-Administered Propofol Sedation Training Curricula and Propofol Administration in Digestive Endoscopy Procedures
    Minciullo, Andrea
    Filomeno, Lucia
    GASTROENTEROLOGY NURSING, 2024, 47 (01) : 33 - 40
  • [40] Registered nurse-administered propofol sedation (RNAPS) versus midazolam and meperidine (MM) for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS): A prospective, randomized trial
    Dewitt, J
    Leblanc, J
    McHenry, L
    Sherman, S
    Baker, J
    Lee, A
    McGreevy, K
    Eckert, G
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 57 (05) : AB78 - AB78