Plan-library supported automated replanning for online-adaptive intensity-modulated proton therapy of cervical cancer

被引:16
|
作者
Jagt, Thyrza Z. [1 ]
Breedveld, Sebastiaan [1 ]
van Haveren, Rens [1 ]
Nout, Remi A. [2 ]
Astreinidou, Eleftheria [2 ]
Heijmen, Ben J. M. [1 ]
Hoogeman, Mischa S. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] HollandPTC, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Cervical cancer; online-adaptive proton therapy; online treatment planning; plan-library; intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT); TREATMENT UNCERTAINTIES; RADIOTHERAPY; SENSITIVITY; GENERATION; FRACTION; SMART; HEAD;
D O I
10.1080/0284186X.2019.1627414
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Intensity-modulated proton therapy is sensitive to inter-fraction variations, including density changes along the pencil-beam paths and variations in organ-shape and location. Large day-to-day variations are seen for cervical cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a novel method for online selection of a plan from a patient-specific library of prior plans for different anatomies, and adapt it for the daily anatomy. Material and methods: The patient-specific library of prior plans accounting for altered target geometries was generated using a pretreatment established target motion model. Each fraction, the best fitting prior plan was selected. This prior plan was adapted using (1) a restoration of spot-positions (Bragg peaks) by adapting the energies to the new water equivalent path lengths; and (2) a spot addition to fully cover the target of the day, followed by a fast optimization of the spot-weights with the reference point method (RPM) to obtain a Pareto-optimal plan for the daily anatomy. Spot addition and spot-weight optimization could be repeated iteratively. The patient cohort consisted of six patients with in total 23 repeat-CT scans, with a prescribed dose of 45 Gy(RBE) to the primary tumor and the nodal CTV. Using a 1-plan-library (one prior plan based on all motion in the motion model) was compared to choosing from a 2-plan-library (two prior plans based on part of the motion). Results: Applying the prior-plan adaptation method with one iteration of adding spots resulted in clinically acceptable target coverage ( and ) for 37/46 plans using the 1-plan-library and 41/46 plans for the 2-plan-library. When adding spots twice, the 2-plan-library approach could obtain acceptable coverage for all scans, while the 1-plan-library approach showed for 3/46 plans. Similar OAR results were obtained. Conclusion: The automated prior-plan adaptation method can successfully adapt for the large day-to-day variations observed in cervical cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1440 / 1445
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Work Outcomes after Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) versus Intensity-Modulated Photon Therapy (IMRT) for Oropharyngeal Cancer
    Smith, Grace L.
    Fu, Shuangshuang
    Ning, Matthew S.
    Nguyen, Diem-Khanh
    Busse, Paul M.
    Foote, Robert L.
    Garden, Adam S.
    Gunn, Gary B.
    Fuller, Clifton D.
    Morrison, William H.
    Chronowski, Gregory M.
    Shah, Shalin J.
    Mayo, Lauren L.
    Phan, Jack
    Reddy, Jay P.
    Snider, James W.
    Patel, Samir H.
    Katz, Sanford R.
    Lin, Alexander
    Mohammed, Nasiruddin
    Dagan, Roi
    Lee, Nancy Y.
    Rosenthal, David, I
    Frank, Steven J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2021, 8 (01) : 319 - 327
  • [22] Individualized Nonadaptive and Online-Adaptive Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Treatment Strategies for Cervical Cancer Patients Based on Pretreatment Acquired Variable Bladder Filling Computed Tomography Scans
    Bondar, M. L.
    Hoogeman, M. S.
    Mens, J. W.
    Quint, S.
    Ahmad, R.
    Dhawtal, G.
    Heijmen, B. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (05): : 1617 - 1623
  • [23] Adaptive Replanning is Required During Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy For Head-and-Neck Cancers
    Yeh, B. K.
    Georges, R. H.
    Zhu, X. R.
    Palmer, M. B.
    Amin, M. V.
    Cheung, J. P.
    Dong, L.
    Nuanjing, J.
    Garcia, J. A.
    Frank, S. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S56 - S57
  • [24] Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for the treatment of head and neck cancer: A dosimetric comparison
    Nguyen, My-Lien
    Cantrell, J. Nathan
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    Henson, Christina
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2021, 46 (03) : 259 - 263
  • [25] Comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), 3D conformal proton therapy and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for the treatment of metastatic brain cancer
    Sullivan, Matthew
    Jin, Hosang
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2023, 48 (02) : 73 - 76
  • [26] Comparing Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy With Intensity-Modulated Photon Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer: The Journey From Clinical Trial Concept to Activation
    Frank, Steven J.
    Blanchard, Pierre
    Lee, J. Jack
    Sturgis, Erich M.
    Kies, Merrill S.
    Machtay, Mitchell
    Vikram, Bhadrasain
    Garden, Adam S.
    Rosenthal, David I.
    Gunn, G. Brandon
    Fuller, C. David
    Hutcheson, Katherine
    Lai, Stephen
    Busse, Paul M.
    Lee, Nancy Y.
    Lin, Alexander
    Foote, Robert L.
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 28 (02) : 108 - 113
  • [27] Weekly robustness evaluation of intensity-modulated proton therapy for oesophageal cancer
    Anakotta, R. Melissa
    van der Laan, Hans P.
    Visser, Sabine
    Ribeiro, Cassia O.
    Dieters, Margriet
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    Both, Stefan
    Korevaar, Erik W.
    Sijtsema, Nanna M.
    Knopf, Antje
    Muijs, Christina T.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 151 : 66 - 72
  • [28] Adaptive replanning intensity-modulated radiotherapy for choroidal metastasis of breast cancer using optical coherence tomography
    Inoue, Toshihiko
    Masai, Norihisa
    Oh, Ryoong-Jin
    Shiomi, Hiroya
    Hashida, Noriyasu
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2014, 55 (03) : 502 - 508
  • [29] Combined intensity-modulated radiation therapy and brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer
    Macdonald, Dusten M.
    Lin, Lillie. L.
    Biehl, Kenneth
    Mutic, Sasa
    Nantz, Regan
    Grigsby, Perry W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 71 (02): : 618 - 624
  • [30] A comparative study of RapidArc and intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan quality for cervical cancer treatment
    Atiq, Atia
    Atiq, Maria
    Iqbal, Khalid
    Sial, Manzar A.
    Altaf, Saima
    Shamsi, Quratul Ain
    Buzdar, Saeed A.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 55 (01) : 74 - 79