What Influences the Implementation of Shared Decision Making: An Umbrella Review

被引:37
|
作者
Alsulamy, Nouf [1 ,4 ]
Lee, Andrew [1 ]
Thokala, Praveen [2 ]
Alessa, Tourkiah [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Publ Hlth, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Hlth Econ & Decis Sci, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Sheffield, Ctr Assist Technol & Connected Healthcare, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Jeddah, Coll Business, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[5] King Saud Univ, Biomed Technol Dept, Coll Appl Med Sci, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Shared decision making; umbrella review; patient-centred care; barriers/facilitators; implementation; MENTAL-HEALTH; CARE; BARRIERS; FACILITATORS; CANCER; COMMUNICATION; INDIVIDUALS; INVOLVEMENT; PREFERENCES; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.009
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To provide a cogent summation of the evidence base of the key barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision making (SDM). Methods: An umbrella review of existing reviews on SDM was adopted. Databases were searched from 1997 to December 2018. Studies were included if they performed a review of barriers and facilitators to SDM. Results: 7 eligible reviews were identified. The five themes identified were: patient factors, professional factors, environmental factors, relationship factors, and factors related to information provision. Lack of time was the main factor hindering the implementation of SDM. Encouragement and motivation of providers to use SDM was a significant enabler of SDM implementation. Conclusions: The provision of time and resources are insufficient if not accompanied by efforts to support and motivate providers to use SDM. Practice implications: Healthcare providers need to be educated on the importance of building a relationship with their patients. To enhance this relationship, physicians may need to improve their interaction skills. They need to be curious and explore their patients' preferences, listen to them and respect their opinions, explain options and outcomes, and encourage them to participate in the decision making. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2400 / 2407
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical review
    Newell, Ben R.
    Shanks, David R.
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2014, 37 (01) : 1 - +
  • [32] Shared decision-making in hypertension: results of implementation in Germany
    Deinzer, A.
    Babel, H.
    Veelken, R.
    Kohnen, R.
    Schmieder, R. E.
    [J]. DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2006, 131 (46) : 2592 - 2596
  • [33] Implementation of Shared Decision-Making in Clinical Practice in Rheumatology
    Ezequiel Borgia, R.
    Salloum, Ramzi G.
    [J]. JCR-JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2020, 26 : S98 - S100
  • [34] Gaps in the Implementation of Shared Decision-making: Illustrative Cases
    Weiss, Elliott Mark
    Clark, Jonna D.
    Heike, Carrie L.
    Rosenberg, Abby R.
    Shah, Seema K.
    Wilfond, Benjamin S.
    Opel, Douglas J.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2019, 143 (03)
  • [35] A Qualitative Systematic Review of Internal and External Influences on Shared Decision-making in All Healthcare Settings
    Truglio-Londrigan, Marie
    Slyer, Jason
    Singleton, Joanne
    Worral, Priscilla
    [J]. NURSING RESEARCH, 2015, 64 (02) : E103 - E103
  • [36] Multifactor Influences of Shared Decision-Making in Acoustic Neuroma Treatment
    Nellis, Jason C.
    Sharon, Jeff D.
    Pross, Seth E.
    Ishii, Lisa E.
    Ishii, Masaru
    Dey, Jacob K.
    Francis, Howard W.
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2017, 38 (03) : 392 - 399
  • [37] What matters to you? Embracing shared decision making in ophthalmology
    Mathew, Rashmi G.
    Timlin, Hannah M.
    MacEwen, Caroline J.
    [J]. EYE, 2021, 35 (06) : 1541 - 1542
  • [38] Shared treatment decision making: What does it mean to physicians?
    Charles, CA
    Whelan, T
    Gafni, A
    Willan, A
    Farrell, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (05) : 932 - 936
  • [39] What matters to you? Embracing shared decision making in ophthalmology
    Rashmi G. Mathew
    Hannah M. Timlin
    Caroline J. MacEwen
    [J]. Eye, 2021, 35 : 1541 - 1542
  • [40] Autonomy: What's Shared Decision Making Have to Do With It?
    Ubel, Peter A.
    Scherr, Karen A.
    Fagerlin, Angela
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2018, 18 (02): : W11 - W12