A systematic review of team formulation in clinical psychology practice: Definition, implementation, and outcomes

被引:27
|
作者
Geach, Nicole [1 ]
Moghaddam, Nima G. [2 ]
De Boos, Danielle [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lincoln, Clin Psychol, Lincoln, England
[2] Univ Lincoln, Coll Social Sci, Clin Psychol, Lincoln LN6 7TS, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Div Psychiat & Appl Psychol, Nottingham, England
关键词
case conceptualisation; clinical psychology; psychological formulation; systematic review; team formulation; STAFF; IMPACT; CONSULTATION; WORKING;
D O I
10.1111/papt.12155
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
PurposeTeam formulation is promoted by professional practice guidelines for clinical psychologists. However, it is unclear whether team formulation is understood/implemented in consistent ways - or whether there is outcome evidence to support the promotion of this practice. This systematic review aimed to (1) synthesize how team formulation practice is defined and implemented by practitioner psychologists and (2) analyse the range of team formulation outcomes in the peer-reviewed literature. MethodsSeven electronic bibliographic databases were searched in June 2016. Eleven articles met inclusion criteria and were quality assessed. Extracted data were synthesized using content analysis. ResultsDescriptions of team formulation revealed three main forms of instantiation: (1) a structured, consultation approach; (2) semi-structured, reflective practice meetings; and (3) unstructured/informal sharing of ideas through routine interactions. Outcome evidence linked team formulation to a range of outcomes for staff teams and service users, including some negative outcomes. Quality appraisal identified significant issues with evaluation methods; such that, overall, outcomes were not well-supported. ConclusionsThere is weak evidence to support the claimed beneficial outcomes of team formulation in practice. There is a need for greater specification and standardization of team formulation' practices, to enable a clearer understanding of any relationships with outcomes and implications for best-practice implementations. Practitioner points Under the umbrella term of team formulation', three types of practice are reported: (1) highly structured consultation; (2) reflective practice meetings; and (3) informal sharing of ideas. Outcomes linked to team formulation, including some negative outcomes, were not well evidenced. Research using robust study designs is required to investigate the process and outcomes of team formulation practice.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 215
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A systematic review of nomograms used in urolithiasis practice to predict clinical outcomes in paediatric patients
    Kailavasan, Mithun
    Berridge, Christopher
    Yuan, Yuhong
    Turner, Alexander
    Donaldson, James
    Biyani, Chandra Shekhar
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2022, 18 (04) : 448 - 462
  • [32] The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature
    Valderas, J. M.
    Kotzeva, A.
    Espallargues, M.
    Guyatt, G.
    Ferrans, C. E.
    Halyard, M. Y.
    Revicki, D. A.
    Symonds, T.
    Parada, A.
    Alonso, J.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2008, 17 (02) : 179 - 193
  • [33] Misfit of implant prostheses and its impact on clinical outcomes. Definition, assessment and a systematic review of the literature
    Katsoulis, Joannis
    Takeichi, Takuro
    Gaviria, Ana Sol
    Peter, Lukas
    Katsoulis, Konstantinos
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2017, 10 : 121 - 138
  • [34] The role of psychology and communication skills in orthodontic practice: a systematic review
    Baxmann, Martin
    Barath, Zoltan
    Karpati, Krisztina
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [35] Does Multidisciplinary Team Management Improve Clinical Outcomes in NSCLC? A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
    de Castro, Gilberto
    Souza, Fabiano Hahn
    Lima, Julia
    Bernardi, Luis Pedro
    Teixeira, Carlos Henrique Andrade
    Prado, Gustavo Faibischew
    JTO CLINICAL AND RESEARCH REPORTS, 2023, 4 (12):
  • [36] Clinical decision support in clinical practice: A systematic review
    Esho, A.
    Choy, K. W.
    Loh, T. P.
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2024, 558
  • [37] Determinants of Exposure Therapy Implementation in Clinical Practice for the Treatment of Anxiety, OCD, and PTSD: A Systematic Review
    Racz, J. I.
    Bialocerkowski, A.
    Calteaux, I.
    Farrell, L. J.
    CLINICAL CHILD AND FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2024, 27 (02) : 317 - 341
  • [38] Factors influencing the implementation of medicine risk communications by healthcare professionals in clinical practice: A systematic review
    Alharbi, Amal Bandar
    Berrou, Ilhem
    Umaru, Nkiruka
    Al Hamid, Abdullah
    Shebl, Nada Atef
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2023, 19 (01): : 28 - 56
  • [39] From research to clinical practice: a systematic review of the implementation of psychological interventions for chronic headache in adults
    Cinzia Perlini
    Valeria Donisi
    Lidia Del Piccolo
    BMC Health Services Research, 20
  • [40] From research to clinical practice: a systematic review of the implementation of psychological interventions for chronic headache in adults
    Perlini, Cinzia
    Donisi, Valeria
    Del Piccolo, Lidia
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)