A systematic review of team formulation in clinical psychology practice: Definition, implementation, and outcomes

被引:27
|
作者
Geach, Nicole [1 ]
Moghaddam, Nima G. [2 ]
De Boos, Danielle [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lincoln, Clin Psychol, Lincoln, England
[2] Univ Lincoln, Coll Social Sci, Clin Psychol, Lincoln LN6 7TS, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Div Psychiat & Appl Psychol, Nottingham, England
关键词
case conceptualisation; clinical psychology; psychological formulation; systematic review; team formulation; STAFF; IMPACT; CONSULTATION; WORKING;
D O I
10.1111/papt.12155
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
PurposeTeam formulation is promoted by professional practice guidelines for clinical psychologists. However, it is unclear whether team formulation is understood/implemented in consistent ways - or whether there is outcome evidence to support the promotion of this practice. This systematic review aimed to (1) synthesize how team formulation practice is defined and implemented by practitioner psychologists and (2) analyse the range of team formulation outcomes in the peer-reviewed literature. MethodsSeven electronic bibliographic databases were searched in June 2016. Eleven articles met inclusion criteria and were quality assessed. Extracted data were synthesized using content analysis. ResultsDescriptions of team formulation revealed three main forms of instantiation: (1) a structured, consultation approach; (2) semi-structured, reflective practice meetings; and (3) unstructured/informal sharing of ideas through routine interactions. Outcome evidence linked team formulation to a range of outcomes for staff teams and service users, including some negative outcomes. Quality appraisal identified significant issues with evaluation methods; such that, overall, outcomes were not well-supported. ConclusionsThere is weak evidence to support the claimed beneficial outcomes of team formulation in practice. There is a need for greater specification and standardization of team formulation' practices, to enable a clearer understanding of any relationships with outcomes and implications for best-practice implementations. Practitioner points Under the umbrella term of team formulation', three types of practice are reported: (1) highly structured consultation; (2) reflective practice meetings; and (3) informal sharing of ideas. Outcomes linked to team formulation, including some negative outcomes, were not well evidenced. Research using robust study designs is required to investigate the process and outcomes of team formulation practice.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 215
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical outcomes following shock team implementation for cardiogenic shock: a systematic review
    Abdelnabi, Mohamed
    Elsaeidy, Ahmed Saad
    Aboutaleb, Aya Moustafa
    Johanis, Amit
    Ghanem, Ahmed K.
    Rezq, Hazem
    Abdelazeem, Basel
    EGYPTIAN HEART JOURNAL, 2024, 76 (01):
  • [2] Considering the team in team formulation: a systematic review
    Short, Valentina
    Covey, Judith A.
    Webster, Lisa A.
    Wadman, Ruth
    Reilly, Joe
    Hay-Gibson, Naomi
    Stain, Helen J.
    MENTAL HEALTH REVIEW JOURNAL, 2019, 24 (01) : 11 - 29
  • [3] Definition, reporting, and interpretation of composite outcomes in clinical trials: systematic review
    Cordoba, Gloria
    Schwartz, Lisa
    Woloshin, Steven
    Bae, Harold
    Gotzsche, Peter C.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 341 : 381
  • [4] SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF POLYPHARMACY DEFINITION, ASSESSMENT TOOLS, AND ASSOCIATION WITH CLINICAL OUTCOMES
    Masnoon, Nashwa
    Shakib, Sepehr
    Kalisch, Lisa
    Caughey, Gillian
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2017, 13 (04): : E28 - E29
  • [5] Systematic review of practice guideline dissemination and implementation strategies for healthcare teams and team-based practice
    Medves, Jennifer
    Godfrey, Christina
    Turner, Carly
    Paterson, Margo
    Harrison, Margaret
    MacKenzie, Lindsay
    Durando, Paola
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2010, 8 (02): : 79 - 89
  • [6] Accessory Auricles: Systematic Review of Definition, Associated Conditions, and Recommendations for Clinical Practice
    Amirhassankhani, Sasan
    Lloyd, Mark S.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 29 (02) : 372 - 375
  • [7] Models and frameworks for assessing the implementation of clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review
    Freitas de Mello, Nicole
    Nascimento Silva, Sarah
    Gomes, Dalila Fernandes
    da Motta Girardi, Juliana
    Barreto, Jorge Otavio Maia
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [8] LINKING SCIENCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: FROM THE SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW TO THE FORMULATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS
    Landewe, R.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2017, 76 : 8 - 8
  • [9] Factors Influencing Outcomes of Clinical Information Systems Implementation A Systematic Review
    Gruber, Dianne
    Cummings, Greta G.
    Leblanc, Lisa
    Smith, Donna L.
    CIN-COMPUTERS INFORMATICS NURSING, 2009, 27 (03) : 151 - 163
  • [10] EVALUATING CLINICAL OUTCOMES AFTER IMPLEMENTATION OF AN ADVANCED PRACTICE PROVIDER LED RAPID RESPONSE TEAM
    Lee-Ekblad, Deborah
    Mastenbrook, Susan
    Wilt, Jeffrey
    Birchmeier, Paul
    Ekblad, Glenn
    Beckwith, Wendy
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (12) : U217 - U217