The impact of broiler production system practices on consumer perceptions of animal welfare

被引:64
|
作者
de Jonge, Janneke [1 ]
van Trijp, Hans C. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Mkt & Consumer Behav Grp, NL-6700 EW Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
broiler production system; animal welfare; consumer perception; conjoint analysis; individual difference; GROWING PIGS; PREFERENCES; POULTRY; FOOD; INFORMATION; ATTITUDES; CITIZENS; ELEMENTS; FARMERS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3382/ps.2013-03334
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This research explores the extent to which different farm management practices influence the perceived animal friendliness of broiler production systems, and how this differs between individuals. Using a conjoint design with paired comparisons, respondents evaluated broiler production systems that were described on the basis of 7 animal welfare-related practices. It was found that practices in the area of outdoor access, stocking density, and day-night rhythm were overall perceived to have a larger impact on perceptions of animal friendliness than other practices, such as transport duration or the type of breed used. However, individuals differed regarding the extent to which they believed the different farm management practices influenced the animal friendliness of the production system. Differences between individuals regarding their knowledge about and familiarity with livestock farming, degree of anthropomorphism, and their moral beliefs regarding animal welfare partly explained the relative importance individuals attached to farm management practices. The obtained insight into which welfare-related farm management practices, in consumers' minds, most strongly contribute to animal welfare, and the existence of differences between consumers, can be helpful in the development of animal welfare-based certification schemes that are appealing to consumers, as well as the positioning of welfare concepts in the market.
引用
收藏
页码:3080 / 3095
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Welfare practices to increase beef production and sustainability: Consumer expectations for 2050
    Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 96 : 92 - 93
  • [22] Perceptions of animal welfare in China
    Loeb, Josh
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2024, 195 (03) : 89 - 89
  • [23] Current Consumer Perceptions of Animal Welfare across Different Farming Sectors on the Island of Ireland
    Sweeney, Sharon
    Regan, Aine
    McKernan, Claire
    Benson, Tony
    Hanlon, Alison
    Dean, Moira
    ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [24] Effects of demographic factors and information sources on United States consumer perceptions of animal welfare
    McKendree, M. G. S.
    Croney, C. C.
    Widmar, N. J. O.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2014, 92 (07) : 3161 - 3173
  • [25] "The Impact of Farm Animal Housing Restrictions on Egg Prices, Consumer Welfare, and Production in California"-Authors' Response to Comment
    Mullally, Conner
    Lusk, Jayson L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 100 (03) : 674 - 675
  • [26] Understanding consumers' perceptions towards Iberian pig production and animal welfare
    Garcia-Gudino, Javier
    Blanco-Penedo, Isabel
    Gispert, Marina
    Brun, Albert
    Perea, Jose
    Font-i-Furnols, Maria
    MEAT SCIENCE, 2021, 172
  • [27] A Survey of Broiler Farmers' Perceptions of Animal Welfare and their Technical Efficiency: A Case Study in Northeast China
    Jo, Hyeonsoo
    Nasrullah, Muhammad
    Jiang, Bing
    Li, Xiang
    Bao, Jun
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL WELFARE SCIENCE, 2022, 25 (03) : 275 - 286
  • [28] CSR practices and consumer perceptions
    Oeberseder, Magdalena
    Schlegelmilch, Bodo B.
    Murphy, Patrick E.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2013, 66 (10) : 1839 - 1851
  • [29] Consumer Perceptions of Plant Production Practices that Aid Pollinator Insects' Health
    Khachatryan, Hayk
    Rihn, Alicia
    HORTSCIENCE, 2017, 52 (05) : 749 - 755
  • [30] Consumer awareness of culling and animal welfare
    Park, Jung Min
    Koh, Jo Ho
    Kim, Jin Man
    FOOD CONTROL, 2022, 133