The impact of broiler production system practices on consumer perceptions of animal welfare

被引:62
|
作者
de Jonge, Janneke [1 ]
van Trijp, Hans C. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Mkt & Consumer Behav Grp, NL-6700 EW Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
broiler production system; animal welfare; consumer perception; conjoint analysis; individual difference; GROWING PIGS; PREFERENCES; POULTRY; FOOD; INFORMATION; ATTITUDES; CITIZENS; ELEMENTS; FARMERS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3382/ps.2013-03334
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This research explores the extent to which different farm management practices influence the perceived animal friendliness of broiler production systems, and how this differs between individuals. Using a conjoint design with paired comparisons, respondents evaluated broiler production systems that were described on the basis of 7 animal welfare-related practices. It was found that practices in the area of outdoor access, stocking density, and day-night rhythm were overall perceived to have a larger impact on perceptions of animal friendliness than other practices, such as transport duration or the type of breed used. However, individuals differed regarding the extent to which they believed the different farm management practices influenced the animal friendliness of the production system. Differences between individuals regarding their knowledge about and familiarity with livestock farming, degree of anthropomorphism, and their moral beliefs regarding animal welfare partly explained the relative importance individuals attached to farm management practices. The obtained insight into which welfare-related farm management practices, in consumers' minds, most strongly contribute to animal welfare, and the existence of differences between consumers, can be helpful in the development of animal welfare-based certification schemes that are appealing to consumers, as well as the positioning of welfare concepts in the market.
引用
收藏
页码:3080 / 3095
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Heterogeneity in consumer perceptions of the animal friendliness of broiler production systems
    de Jonge, Janneke
    van Trijp, Hans
    FOOD POLICY, 2014, 49 : 174 - 185
  • [2] Good agricultural practices in broiler chicken production in the state of Parana: focus on animal welfare
    Oliveira Souza, Ana Paula
    Maiolino Molento, Carla Forte
    CIENCIA RURAL, 2015, 45 (12): : 2239 - 2244
  • [3] Broiler meat characteristics relevant to the consumer: focus on animal welfare
    Bonamigo, Anderson
    dos Santos Silva Bonamigo, Clarisse Barreto
    Maiolino Molento, Carla Forte
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2012, 41 (04): : 1044 - 1050
  • [4] Mid-term financial impact of animal welfare improvements in Dutch broiler production
    Gocsik, E.
    Lansink, A. G. J. M. Oude
    Saatkamp, H. W.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2013, 92 (12) : 3314 - 3329
  • [5] ANIMAL WELFARE IN DIFFERENT HOUSING SYSTEMS OF BROILER PRODUCTION
    Nazareno, Aerica C.
    Pandorfi, Heliton
    Guiselini, Cristiane
    Vigoderis, Ricardo B.
    Pedrosa, Elvira M. R.
    ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA, 2011, 31 (01): : 13 - 22
  • [6] BROILER AND SWINE PRODUCTION: ANIMAL WELFARE LEGISLATION SCENARIO
    Rodrigues da Silva, Raquel Baracat Tosi
    Naeaes, Irenilza de Alencar
    de Moura, Daniella Jorge
    SCIENTIA AGRICOLA, 2009, 66 (06): : 713 - 720
  • [7] Reconstruction of poultry farming - consumer opinions on animal welfare broiler husbandry
    Heijne, Desiree
    BERICHTE UBER LANDWIRTSCHAFT, 2019, 97 (01):
  • [8] ANIMAL-WELFARE IN BROILER PRODUCTION - INVESTIGATIONS OF BROILER PRODUCTION IN THE DISTRICT OF WESER-EMS
    PETERMANN, S
    ROMING, L
    DEUTSCHE TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1994, 101 (03): : 113 - 117
  • [9] THE IMPACT OF FARM ANIMAL HOUSING RESTRICTIONS ON EGG PRICES, CONSUMER WELFARE, AND PRODUCTION IN CALIFORNIA
    Mullally, Conner
    Lusk, Jayson L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 100 (03) : 649 - 669
  • [10] College student perceptions of animal welfare and production agriculture practices at a small Historical Black University
    Rippeto, J. D.
    Cash, K. A.
    Shanks, B. C.
    Caldwell, J. D.
    Aruguete, M. S.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 : 197 - 197