Evolutionary emergence of collective intelligence in large groups of students

被引:5
|
作者
Orejudo, Santos [1 ]
Cano-Escoriaza, Jacobo [2 ]
Belen Cebollero-Salinas, Ana [2 ]
Bautista, Pablo [1 ]
Clemente-Gallardo, Jesus [3 ,4 ]
Rivero, Alejandro [5 ]
Rivero, Pilar [6 ]
Tarancon, Alfonso [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zaragoza, Dept Psychol & Sociol, Zaragoza, Spain
[2] Univ Zaragoza, Dept Sci Educ, Zaragoza, Spain
[3] Univ Zaragoza, Dept Theoret Phys, Zaragoza, Spain
[4] Univ Zaragoza, Inst Biocomputat & Phys Complex Syst, Zaragoza, Spain
[5] Kampal Data Solut, Zaragoza, Spain
[6] Univ Zaragoza, Dept Specif Didact, Zaragoza, Spain
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2022年 / 13卷
关键词
collective intelligence; social experiment; web platform; mathematics test; moral reasoning; PERFORMANCE; WISDOM;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.848048
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The emergence of collective intelligence has been studied in much greater detail in small groups than in larger ones. Nevertheless, in groups of several hundreds or thousands of members, it is well-known that the social environment exerts a considerable influence on individual behavior. A few recent papers have dealt with some aspects of large group situations, but have not provided an in-depth analysis of the role of interactions among the members of a group in the creation of ideas, as well as the group's overall performance. In this study, we report an experiment where a large set of individuals, i.e., 789 high-school students, cooperated online in real time to solve two different examinations on a specifically designed platform (Thinkhub). Our goal of this paper 6 to describe the specific mechanisms of idea creation we were able to observe and to measure the group's performance as a whole. When we deal with communication networks featuring a large number of interacting entities, it seems natural to model the set as a complex system by resorting to the tools of statistical mechanics. Our experiment shows how an interaction in small groups that increase in size over several phases, leading to a final phase where the students are confronted with the most popular answers of the previous phases, is capable of producing high-quality answers to all examination questions, whereby the last phase plays a crucial role. Our experiment likewise shows that a group's performance in such a task progresses in a linear manner in parallel with the size of the group. Finally, we show that the controlled interaction and dynamics foreseen in the system can reduce the spread of "fake news" within the group.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cumulative culture can emerge from collective intelligence in animal groups
    Takao Sasaki
    Dora Biro
    [J]. Nature Communications, 8
  • [42] The magic of collective emotional intelligence in learning groups: No guys needed for the spell!
    Curseu, Petru L.
    Pluut, Helen
    Boros, Smaranda
    Meslec, Nicoleta
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 106 (02) : 217 - 234
  • [43] Smart groups of smart people: Evidence for IQ as the origin of collective intelligence in the performance of human groups
    Bates, Timothy C.
    Gupta, Shivani
    [J]. INTELLIGENCE, 2017, 60 : 46 - 56
  • [44] Cumulative culture can emerge from collective intelligence in animal groups
    Sasaki, Takao
    Biro, Dora
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2017, 8
  • [45] Integrating Collective Intelligence into Evolutionary Multi-Objective Algorithms: Interactive Preferences
    Cinalli, Danie
    Marti, Luis
    Sanchez-Pi, Nayat
    Bicharra Garcia, Ana Cristina
    [J]. 2015 LATIN AMERICA CONGRESS ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (LA-CCI), 2015,
  • [46] Collective Intelligence Model: How to Describe Collective Intelligence
    Georgi, Sandro
    Jung, Reinhard
    [J]. ADVANCES IN COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE 2011, 2012, 113 : 53 - 64
  • [47] Are distrust relationships beneficial for group performance? The influence of the scope of distrust on the emergence of collective intelligence
    Massari, Giovanni F.
    Giannoccaro, Ilaria
    Carbone, Giuseppe
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2019, 208 : 343 - 355
  • [48] Collective Intelligence
    Leimeister, Jan Marco
    [J]. BUSINESS & INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2010, 2 (04) : 245 - 248
  • [49] The Emergence of Intelligence
    Li Yan
    Zhang Zhi-Ping
    [J]. PROGRESS IN BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 2016, 43 (04) : 348 - 353
  • [50] THE EMERGENCE OF INTELLIGENCE
    CALVIN, WH
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1994, 271 (04) : 101 - 107