Comparison of strength and construction tolerances in concrete

被引:0
|
作者
Cutshall, BE [1 ]
Leming, ML
Johnston, DW
机构
[1] McDevitt St Bovis, Charlotte, NC USA
[2] N Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
compressive strength; construction; reinforced concrete; tests; tolerances (mechanics);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Two approaches to the tolerance limit for compressive strength of concrete in reinforced members are compared. One tolerance limit for strength, in use since 1971, is f'c - 500 psi (3.4 MPa). Another tolerance, based on 0.90 f'(c), provides a more direct link between design and quality control criteria consistent with the use of strength reduction factors. The utility of each tolerance was evaluated by comparing the effect of the tolerance on selected structural capacities with the effects of other typical construction tolerances. On this basis, the investigation Sound that a strength tolerance of 0.90 f'(c) is a more consistent representation of allowable concrete strength variation than f'(c) - 500 psi (3.4 MPa). While this approach is not sufficient by itself; it does indicate that the 0.90f'(c) criteria is a more rational approach to compressive strength tolerance.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:491 / 494
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Accounting for Tolerances in the Strength Calculations of Structures
    Chernyavskii, A. O.
    Chernyavskii, O. F.
    JOURNAL OF MACHINERY MANUFACTURE AND RELIABILITY, 2023, 52 (02) : 144 - 150
  • [32] THE INFLUENCE OF A COMPLEX ADDITIVE ON THE STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS OF CONCRETE FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION
    Rakhimova, Galiya
    Slavcheva, Galina
    Aisanova, Madina
    Rakhimov, Murat
    Tkach, Evgeniya
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMATE, 2023, 25 (110): : 243 - 250
  • [33] High-strength fiber concrete for industrial and civil construction
    Klyuyev, S. V.
    MAGAZINE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2012, 34 (08): : 77 - 84
  • [35] Concrete Compressive Strength Obtained on Uncontrolled Construction Sites in Lebanon
    Chehade, Fadi Hage
    2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS FOR ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS, 2009, : 58 - 61
  • [36] PRACTICAL CONSTRUCTION TOLERANCES FOR AERIAL GUIDEWAYS
    LEVERENZ, DG
    AUTOMATED PEOPLE MOVERS II: NEW LINKS FOR LAND USE - AUTOMATED PEOPLE MOVER OPPORTUNITIES FOR MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTERS, 1989, : 226 - 233
  • [37] COMPARISON OF CREEP, ELASTICITY AND STRENGTH OF CONCRETE IN TENSION AND IN COMPRESSION
    BROOKS, JJ
    NEVILLE, AM
    MAGAZINE OF CONCRETE RESEARCH, 1978, 30 (104) : 165 - 165
  • [38] Comparison of compressive strength of concrete block masonry prisms and solid concrete prisms
    Rizaee, S.
    Hagel, M. D.
    Kaheh, P.
    Shrive, N.
    BRICK AND BLOCK MASONRY: TRENDS, INNOVATIONS AND CHALLENGES, 2016, : 1839 - 1846
  • [39] COMPARISON OF POZZOLANIC ADDITIVES FOR NORMAL AND HIGH STRENGTH CONCRETE
    Justs, Janis
    Shakhmenko, Genadij
    Bajare, Diana
    Toropovs, Nikolajs
    ENVIRONMENT, TECHNOLOGY, RESOURCES, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE, 2011, VOL II, 2011, : 79 - 84
  • [40] Comparison of Evaluation Tests for Compressive Strength of Structural Concrete
    Yan, Jiachuan
    Liu, Kaihua
    Zou, Chaoying
    Mo, Yilung
    Ou, Jinping
    PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2020, 64 (02): : 387 - 395