Patient-reported Quality of Life and Satisfaction With Cosmetic Outcomes After Breast Conservation and Mastectomy With and Without Reconstruction Results of a Survey of Breast Cancer Survivors

被引:193
|
作者
Jagsi, Reshma [1 ]
Li, Yun [2 ]
Morrow, Monica [3 ]
Janz, Nancy [2 ]
Alderman, Amy [4 ]
Graff, John [5 ]
Hamilton, Ann [6 ]
Katz, Steven [1 ,2 ]
Hawley, Sarah [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Swan Ctr Plast Surg, Alpharetta, GA USA
[5] Rutgers Canc Inst New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[6] Univ So Calif, Los Angeles, CA USA
[7] Ann Arbor VA Med Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
breast cancer; breast reconstruction; lumpectomy; quality of life; radiation therapy; CONSERVING SURGICAL-PROCEDURES; RADIATION-THERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; TISSUE; COMPLICATIONS; IMPLANT; CARCINOMA; SURGERY; TRENDS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000000908
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Although breast conservation is therapeutically equivalent to mastectomy for most patients with early-stage breast cancer, an increasing number of patients are pursuing mastectomy, which may be followed by breast reconstruction. We sought to evaluate long-term quality of life and cosmetic outcomes after different locoregional management approaches, as perceived by patients themselves. Methods: We surveyed women with a diagnosis of nonmetastatic breast cancer from 2005 to 2007, as reported to the Los Angeles and Detroit population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries. We received responses from 2290 women approximately 9 months after diagnosis (73% response rate) and from 1536 of these 4 years later. We evaluated quality of life and patterns and correlates of satisfaction with cosmetic outcomes overall and, more specifically, within the subgroup undergoing mastectomy with reconstruction, using multivariable linear regression. Results: Of the 1450 patients who responded to both surveys and experienced no recurrence, 963 underwent breast-conserving surgery, 263 mastectomy without reconstruction, and 222 mastectomy with reconstruction. Cosmetic satisfaction was similar between those receiving breast conservation therapy and those receiving mastectomy with reconstruction. Among patients receiving mastectomy with reconstruction, reconstruction type and radiation receipt were associated with satisfaction (P < 0.001), with an adjusted scaled satisfaction score of 4.7 for patients receiving autologous reconstruction without radiation, 4.4 for patients receiving autologous reconstruction and radiation therapy, 4.1 for patients receiving implant reconstruction without radiation therapy, and 2.8 for patients receiving implant reconstruction and radiation therapy. Conclusions: Patient-reported cosmetic satisfaction was similar after breast conservation and after mastectomy with reconstruction. In patients undergoing postmastectomy radiation, the use of autologous reconstruction may mitigate the deleterious impact of radiation on cosmetic outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1198 / 1206
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patient-reported outcomes in bilateral prophylactic mastectomy with breast reconstruction: A narrative review
    Ticha, Pavla
    Sukop, Andrej
    [J]. BREAST, 2024, 73
  • [32] Patient-reported outcomes among women with unilateral breast cancer undergoing breast conservation versus single or double mastectomy
    Pesce, Catherine
    Jaffe, Jennifer
    Kuchta, Kristine
    Yao, Katharine
    Sisco, Mark
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2021, 185 (02) : 359 - 369
  • [33] Patient-reported outcomes among women with unilateral breast cancer undergoing breast conservation versus single or double mastectomy
    Catherine Pesce
    Jennifer Jaffe
    Kristine Kuchta
    Katharine Yao
    Mark Sisco
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2021, 185 : 359 - 369
  • [34] Patient-Reported Outcomes of Aesthetics and Satisfaction in Immediate Breast Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Implants and Fat Grafting
    Qureshi, Ali A.
    Odom, Elizabeth B.
    Parikh, Rajiv P.
    Myckatyn, Terence M.
    Tenenbaum, Marissa M.
    [J]. AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2017, 37 (09) : 999 - 1008
  • [35] Quality of life and patient satisfaction after breast reconstruction
    Papadopulos, N. A.
    Kovacs, L.
    Baumann, A.
    Ali, S.
    Herschbach, P.
    Henrich, G.
    Biemer, E.
    [J]. CHIRURG, 2006, 77 (07): : 610 - 615
  • [36] BREAST-Q satisfaction and quality of life outcomes in young women undergoing mastectomy and reconstruction for breast cancer
    Dominici, Laura
    Hu, Jiani
    Kim, Hee Jeong
    King, Tari
    Ruddy, Kathryn
    Tamimi, Rulla
    Peppercorn, Jeffrey
    Schapira, Lidia
    Borges, Virginia
    Come, Stephen
    Warner, Ellen
    Wong, Julia
    Partridge, Ann
    Rosenberg, Shoshana
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 80 (04)
  • [37] Discussion: Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Multicenter Comparison of Four Abdominally Based Autologous Reconstruction Methods
    Kim, John Y. S.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 137 (03) : 772 - 774
  • [38] Patient-Reported Outcomes after Breast Cancer Operation
    Roldan, Estefania
    Bhasin, Shreya
    Bharani, Tina
    Mitri, Samir
    Flores, Rene
    James, Ted A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2023, 237 (05) : S58 - S58
  • [39] Breast Cancer Patient-Reported Quality of Life Outcomes Following Radiation Therapy
    Gan, M.
    Ganju, R. G.
    Faucheux, M.
    Tennapel, M. J.
    Mitchell, M. P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E54 - E54
  • [40] Timing of Chemotherapy and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Mastectomy with Immediate Reconstruction
    Pawloski, Kate R.
    Srour, Marissa K.
    Moo, Tracy-Ann
    Sevilimedu, Varadan
    Nelson, Jonas A.
    Garcia, Paula
    Kirstein, Laurie J.
    Morrow, Monica
    Tadros, Audree B.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (05) : 2897 - 2909