Hurricane Evacuation Route Choice of Major Bridges in Miami Beach, Florida

被引:35
|
作者
Sadri, Arif Mohaimin [1 ]
Ukkusuri, Satish V. [1 ]
Murray-Tuite, Pamela [2 ]
Gladwin, Hugh [3 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Lyles Sch Civil Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Falls Church, VA 22043 USA
[3] Florida Int Univ, Dept Global & Sociocultural Studies, North Miami, FL 33181 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
MOBILIZATION TIME; MODEL; UNDERSTAND; SIMULATION; BEHAVIOR; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3141/2532-18
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Evacuation is a typical recourse to prevent loss of life if a high storm surge occurs, especially in hurricane-prone regions. Bridges are the key locations of bottlenecks. Because of the specific geographic shape and roadway network of Miami Beach, Florida, residents need to evacuate over one of the six major bridges or causeways: MacArthur Causeway, Venetian Causeway, Julia Tuttle Causeway, John E Kennedy Causeway, Broad Causeway, and Haulover Bridge. A mixed logit model is presented to identify the determining factors for evacuees from Miami Beach in selecting one of these bridges during a major hurricane. The model was developed by using data obtained from a survey that included a hypothetical Category 4 (major) hurricane scenario to reveal the most likely plans for evacuees from this area. The estimation findings suggest that the preference over a given bridge involves a complex interaction of variables, such as distance to reach the evacuation destination, evacuation-specific characteristics (evacuation day, time, mode, and destination), and evacuee-specific characteristics (gender, race, evacuation experience, and living experience). The normally distributed random parameters in the model account for the existence of unobserved heterogeneity across different observations. The findings of this study will help emergency officials and policy makers to develop efficient operational measures and better evacuation plans for a major hurricane by determining different fractions of people taking each of the six bridges.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 173
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Modeling Hurricane Hazards and Damage on Florida Bridges
    Sobanjo, John O.
    Thompson, Paul D.
    Kerr, Richard
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2013, (2360) : 60 - 68
  • [12] Hurricane Modification and Adaptation in Miami-Dade County, Florida
    Klima, Kelly
    Lin, Ning
    Emanuel, Kerry
    Morgan, M. Granger
    Grossmann, Iris
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (02) : 636 - 642
  • [13] Art Basel, Miami Beach, Miami, Florida, 7-10 December 2017
    McCleary, Badir
    [J]. VISUAL INQUIRY-LEARNING & TEACHING ART, 2018, 7 (01) : 77 - 79
  • [14] Beach sands between Charleston, South Carolina, and Miami, Florida
    Martens, JHC
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1935, 46 (9/12): : 1563 - 1596
  • [15] An environmental justice assessment of public beach access in Miami, Florida
    Montgomery, Marilyn C.
    Chakraborty, Jayajit
    Grineski, Sara E.
    Collins, Timothy W.
    [J]. APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 62 : 147 - 156
  • [16] VISITORS' MOTIVATION FOR ATTENDING THE SOUTH BEACH WINE AND FOOD FESTIVAL, MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA
    Park, Kwang-Soo
    Reisinger, Yvette
    Kang, Hyun-Jung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAVEL & TOURISM MARKETING, 2008, 25 (02) : 161 - 181
  • [17] EFFECTS OF HURRICANE ELOISE ON BEACH AND COASTAL STRUCTURES, FLORIDA PANHANDLE
    MORTON, RA
    [J]. GEOLOGY, 1976, 4 (05) : 277 - 280
  • [18] Beachgoer's recognition of rip current hazard at Miami Beach, Florida
    Fallon, Kathleen M.
    Lai, Qing
    Leatherman, Stephen P.
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 165 : 63 - 70
  • [19] Arata Iisozaki, Bass-Museum-of-Art, Miami Beach, Florida
    Betsky, A
    [J]. ARCHITECTURE, 2001, 90 (05): : 112 - 117
  • [20] Estimating road network accessibility during a hurricane evacuation: A case study of hurricane Irma in Florida
    Zhu, Yi-Jie
    Hu, Yujie
    Collins, Jennifer M.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 83