Quantitative Intellectual Property Protection Using Physical-Level Characterization

被引:5
|
作者
Wei, Sheng [1 ]
Nahapetian, Ani [1 ,2 ]
Potkonjak, Miodrag [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Comp Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Calif State Univ Northridge, Dept Comp Sci, Northridge, CA 91330 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Intellectual property protection; hardware metering; gate-level characterization; DESIGN; CIRCUITS;
D O I
10.1109/TIFS.2013.2277976
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Hardware metering, the extraction of unique and persistent identifiers (IDs), is a crucial process for numerous integrated circuit (IC) intellectual property protection tasks. The currently known hardware metering approaches, however, are subject to alternations due to device aging, since they employ unstable manifestational IC properties. We, on the other hand, have developed the first robust hardware metering approach by using physical-level gate proprieties for ID generation. By using effective channel length, which is resilient to aging, and threshold voltage, which is essentially independent across gates and suitable for calculating the uniqueness of the IDs, we overcome the limitations of the existing approaches. Also, despite the increase in threshold voltage that occurs with aging, the original threshold voltage value can be extracted through intentional IC aging. Our ID generation procedure first employs two types of side channels, namely switching power and leakage power, to extract metering results for each gate. Next, we show that localized delay measurements alone are sufficient for accurate characterization of large sets of gates. Finally, by using threshold voltage for ID creation, we are able to obtain low probabilities of coincidence between legitimate and pirated ICs. The application of the approach to a set of benchmarks quantitatively establishes the effectiveness of the new hardware metering approach.
引用
收藏
页码:1722 / 1730
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] University, Intellectual Property and Protection
    Martinez Rincones, Jose Francisco
    PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL, 2005, (8-9): : 273 - 290
  • [22] Modularity and intellectual property protection
    Baldwin, Carliss Y.
    Henkel, Joachim
    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (11) : 1637 - 1655
  • [23] Intellectual property protection - Litigation
    Kaminski, MD
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1998, 215 : U145 - U145
  • [24] International Intellectual Property Protection
    De Miguel Asensio, Pedro Alberto
    ANUARIO ESPANOL DE DERECHO INTERNACIONAL PRIVADO, 2019, 19-20 : 827 - 829
  • [25] INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION IN THE USA
    GREGURAS, FM
    INFORMATION AGE, 1987, 9 (04): : 215 - 219
  • [26] PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INTERESTS
    ROSNAY, JD
    LEONARDO, 1996, 29 (03) : 250 - 251
  • [27] International protection of intellectual property
    Grossman, GA
    Lai, ELC
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2004, 94 (05): : 1635 - 1653
  • [28] Intellectual property protection and pharmaceuticals
    Chirac, P
    Kaddar, M
    LANCET, 1998, 352 (9133): : 1072 - 1072
  • [29] Watermarking for intellectual property protection
    Fan, YC
    Tsao, HW
    ELECTRONICS LETTERS, 2003, 39 (18) : 1316 - 1318
  • [30] Intellectual property protection for plants
    Cheryl H. Agris
    Nature Biotechnology, 1999, 17 : 197 - 198